Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?

References

• Roberts CL, Taylor L, Henderson-Smart D. Trends in births at and beyond term: evidence of a change?. BJOG. 1999; 106: 937–42
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin J, Blondel B, Alexander S, Breart G. Variation in rates of postterm birth in Europe: reality or artefact?. BJOG. 2007; 114: 1097–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, Russell R, Bettegowda VR, Dolan S, et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin Perinatol. 2006; 30(1)8–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingemarsson I, Kallen K. Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden, 1982–1991: a register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997; 76: 658–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakling J, Backe B. Pregnancy risk increases from 41 weeks of gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85: 663–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divon MY, Haglund B, Nisell H, Otterblad PO, Westgren M. Fetal and neonatal mortality in the postterm pregnancy: the impact of gestational age and fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 726–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Low 5-minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million term births. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 65–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, Alessandri LM, O'Sullivan F, Burton PR, et al. Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ. 1998; 317: 1549–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 291–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Perinatal factors associated with cerebral palsy in children born in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1499–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. BJOG. 1998; 105: 169–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006( 4):CD004945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. Number 55, September 2004 (replaces practice pattern number 6, October 1997). Management of postterm pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:639–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson LA, Johansen OJ, Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KA. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 609–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993; 270: 2598–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.sbu.se/sv/Publicerat/Gul/Rorbehandling-vid-inflammation-i-mellanorat/.
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Schultz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanations and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134: 663–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1987–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327: 557–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315: 629–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomised controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1587–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers ER, Blumrick R, Christian AL, Santanu Datta S, Gray RN, Kolimaga JT, , et al. Management of prolonged pregnancy. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 53 (Prepared by Duke Evidence-based Practice Center, Durham, NC, under Contract No. 290-97-0014). AHRQ Publication No. 02-E018. Rockville, , MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, Kaunitz AM. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101: 1312–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augensen K, Bergsjo P, Eikeland T, Askvik K, Carlsen J. Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294:1192–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsjo P, Huang GD, Yu SQ, Gao ZZ, Bakketeig LS. Comparison of induced versus non-induced labor in post-term pregnancy. A randomised prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989; 68: 683–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanrachakul B, Herabutya Y. Postterm with favorable cervix: is induction necessary?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 106: 154–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson DC, Miller PD, Armstrong MA. Management of prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor versus antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156: 928–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelisen O, Caliskan E, Dilbaz S, Ozdas E, Dilbaz B, Ozdas E, et al. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005; 120: 164–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Hyett J, Mattsson LA, Salvesen KA. Women's experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 950–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herabutya Y, Prasertsawat PO, Tongyai T, Isarangura Na Ayudthya N. Prolonged pregnancy: the management dilemma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 19924:253–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James C, George SS, Gaunekar N, Seshadri L. Management of prolonged pregnancy: a randomised trial of induction of labour and antepartum foetal monitoring. Natl Med J India. 2001; 14: 270–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JN, Jr, Sessums JK, Howard P, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Alternative approaches to the management of gravidas with prolonged-postterm-postdate pregnancies. J Miss State Med Assoc. 1989; 4: 105–11
   Google Scholar
• A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:716–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roach VJ, Rogers MS. Pregnancy outcome beyond 41 weeks gestation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 59: 19–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witter FR, Weitz CM. A randomised trial of induction at 42 weeks gestation versus expectant management for postdates pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 1987; 43: 206–11
   Google Scholar
• Breart G, Goujard J, Maillard F, Chavigny C, Rumeau-Rouquette C, Sureau C. [Comparison of 2 obstetrical attitudes vis-a-vis inducing labor at term. Randomised study]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1982; 11: 107–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole RA, Howie PW, Macnaughton MC. Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial. Lancet. 1975; 17910: 767–70
   Google Scholar
• Egarter C, Kofler E, Fitz R, Husslein P. Is induction of labor indicated in prolonged pregnancy? Results of a prospective randomised trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1989; 27: 6–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry GR. A controlled trial of surgical induction of labour and amnioscopy in the management of prolonged pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969; 76: 795–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chakravarti S, Goenka B. Conservative policy of two obstetrical policies with regard to artificial induction of labour at term. A randomised trial. XVI FIGO World Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington, DC; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Suikkari AM, Jalkanen M, Heiskala H, Koskela O. Prolonged pregnancy: induction or observation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Supplement. 1983; 116: 58
   Google Scholar
• Ocon L, Hurtado R, Coteron JJ, Zubiria A, Ramirez O, Garcia JA. Prolonged pregnancy: procedure guidelines [Gestacion prolongada: pautas de actuacion]. Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecologia. 1997; 40: 101–6
   Google Scholar
• Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Brorsson B, Bergh C. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical pracitice?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 6–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar