Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987–2003: A nationwide trend analysis

References

• Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 549–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintosh L, McPherson K, Coulter A, Yeates D. The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 402–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlson KJ, Nichols DH, Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Eng J Med 1993; 328: 856–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen HS, Makinen JI. Mortality after gynaecologic operations in Finland, 1986–1991. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 54–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McPherson K, Metcalfe MA, Herbert A, Maresh M, Casbard A, Hargreaves J, et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. BJOG 2004; 111: 688–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luoto R, Keskimaki I, Reunanen A. Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 67–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart RJ, Chatzipapas IK, Magos A. The cost of a hysterectomy in a UK hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 19: 522–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1091–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies A, Magos A. The hysterectomy lottery. J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 21: 166–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gimbel H, Ottesen B, Tabor A. Danish gynecologists’ opinion about hysterectomy on benign indication: results of a survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 1123–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C. Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 2007; 370: 1494–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 572 e1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart R, Molnar BG, Magos A. Long term follow up of hysteroscopic myomectomy assessed by survival analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 700–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurst BS, Stackhouse DJ, Matthews ML, Marshburn PB. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine myomas. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 855–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, Grenman S, Kivela A, et al. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 273–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1278–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson A, Spetz C, Carsjo K, Nightingale R, Smedby B. Reliability of the hospital registry. The diagnostic data are better than their reputation. Lakartidningen 1994; 91: 603–5
   Google Scholar
• Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 2008; 14: CR24–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOMESCO. Health statistics in the Nordic Countries 2006. http://nomesco-eng.nom-nos.dk/filer/publikationer/Helse%202006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H, Settnes A, Tabor A. Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988–1998. A register based trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 267–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaby A, Ivanova V, Johnson N. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; April 19: CD004993.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbel H. Total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases? A meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 133–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskimaki I, Aro S, Teperi J. Regional variation in surgical procedure rates in Finland. Scand J Soc Med 1994; 22: 132–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aksu F, Gezer A, Oral E. Seventeen-year review of hysterectomy procedures in a university clinic in Istanbul (1985-2001). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2004; 270: 217–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Hammond I, Bolck A. Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83 000 procedures over 23 years. BJOG 2006; 113: 804–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorma S, Teperi J, Hurskainen R, Keskimaki I, Kujansuu E. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987–1995 – a register based analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 770–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 229–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang JL, Seow KM, Tsai YL, Huang LW, Hsieh BC, Lee C. Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 1132–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berretta R, Merisio C, Melpignano M, Rolla M, Ceccaroni M, de Ioris A, et al. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: a retrospective study in a selective population. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 797–802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgman SA, Dunn KM. Has endometrial ablation replaced hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding? National figures. BJOG 2000; 107: 531–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farquhar CM, Naoom S, Steiner CA. The impact of endometrial ablation on hysterectomy rates in women with benign uterine conditions in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18: 625–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M, et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Tiitinen A. Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 113–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kives SL, Levy BS, Levine RL. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 2000 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 135–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar