References
- Socialstyrelsen. Epidemiologiskt Centrum-Folkhälsa i siffror [in Swedish]. Available at http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Statistik/statistikdatabas/.
- Carlson KJ, Nichols DH, Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 856–60
- Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 19(2):CD003677. Update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (1):CD003677.
- Gimbel H, Ottesen B, Tabor A. Danish gynecologists’ opinion about hysterectomy on benign indication: results of a survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 1123–31
- Thakar R, Manyonda I, Robinson G, Clarkson P, Stanton S. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: a survey of current views and practice among British gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 18: 267–9
- Zekam N, Oyelese Y, Goodwin K, Colin C, Sinai I, Queenan JT. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: a survey of gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 301–5
- Swedish Medical Association. Physicians in Sweden. 2005. Available at http://www.slf.se/upload/Läkarfakta_2005_eng_webb.pdf (Retrieved June 3, 2005).
- Kilkku P, Hirvonen T, Grönroos M. Supra-vaginal uterine amputation vs. abdominal hysterectomy: the effects on urinary symptoms with special reference to pollakisuria, nocturia and dysuria. Maturitas. 1981; 3: 197–204
- Kilkku P. Supravaginal uterine amputation vs. hysterectomy. Effects on coital frequency and dyspareunia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983; 62: 141–5
- Kilkku P, Grönroos M, Hirvonen T, Rauramo L. Supravaginal uterine amputation vs. hysterectomy. Effects on libido and orgasm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983; 62: 147–52
- Pettersson F, Malker B. Invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix following diagnosis and treatment of in situ carcinoma. Record linkage study within a National Cancer Registry. Radiother Oncol. 1989; 16: 115–20
- Viikki M, Pukkala E, Hakama M. Risk of cervical cancer subsequent to a positive screening cytology: follow-up study in Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 576–9
- Mitchell H, Hocking J. Influences on the risk of recurrent high grade cervical abnormality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002; 12: 728–34
- Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989; 5: 213–6
- Ottosen C. Dare to perform the surgery vaginally! Vaginal hysterectomy is to be preferred when there is no indication for the abdominal intervention [in Swedish]. Lakartidningen 1997; 94: 2183–6