Levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque on aged restorations of an ion-releasing and a universal hybrid composite resin

References

• Neff D. Acid production from different carbohydrate sources in human plaque in situ. Caries Res 1967; 1: 78–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd EAM. Caries diagnosis within restored teeth. Adv Dent Res 1990; 4: 10–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgerald RJ, Adams BO, Davis ME. A microbiological study of recurrent dentinal caries. Caries Res 1994; 28: 409–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bardow A, Moe D, Nyvad B, Nauntofte B. The buffer capacity and buffer systems of human whole saliva measured without loss of CO2. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmusson CG, Lundin SÅ. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995; 19: 173–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 171–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 245–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989; 17: 10–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijken JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement–composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 368–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and II composite restorations. J Dent 1997; 25: 229–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg M. Three-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in class II cavities. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 33–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobias RS. Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. Int End J 1988; 21: 155–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite–dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25: 435–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen MJ, Bruun C. Caries chemistry and fluoride-mechanisms of action. Textbook of clinical cariology2nd, A Thylstrup, O Fejerskov. Munksgaard, Copenhagen 1994; 231–57
   Google Scholar
• ten Cate JM, van Duinen RNB. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1266–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maltz M, Emilsson CG. Susceptibility of oral bacteria to various fluoride salts. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 786–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loveren C. The antimicrobial action of fluoride and its role in caries inhibition. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 676–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shellis RP, Duckworth RM. Studies on the cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 263–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seppä L, Torppa-Saarinen E, Luoma H. Effect of different glass ionomers on the acid production and electrolyte metabolism of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt. Caries Res 1992; 26: 434–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton IR. Biochemical effects of fluoride on oral bacteria. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 660–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtsen W, Bubeck P, Leyhausen G, Garcia-Godoy F. Effects of extraction media upon fluoride release from a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Clin Oral Inv 1998; 2: 143–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 20–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 16–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer W, Lippman N, Kaim J. Antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cements and other restorative materials. Oper Dent 1989; 14: 77–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barkhordar RA, Kempler D, Pelzner RRB, Stark MM. Technical note: antimicrobial action of glass ionomer lining cement on S Sanguis and S mutans. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 281–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg JH, Farrell JE, Brown LR. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci. Pediatr Dent 1990; 12: 20–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 861–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijken JWV, Kalfas S, Litra V, Oliveby A. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and composite resin. Caries Res 1997; 31: 379–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heintze SD. A new material concept for inhibiting the formation of secondary caries. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 4–7
   Google Scholar
• Persson A, Lingström P, van Dijken JWV. Effect of a hydroxyl-ion-releasing composite resin on plaque acidogenicity. Caries Res, In press
   Google Scholar
• Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resins composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 166–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 395–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski A, Haller B. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro. Caries Res 2002; 36: 101–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijken JWV. Three-year performance of a calcium-, fluoride- and hydroxyl ion-releasing resin composite. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 155–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold OG, Jordan HV, van Houte J. A selective medium for Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol, 18: 1357–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, Donati ME, Breschi L, Prati C, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative material. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4457–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley J, Blackwell A. Ion-release from copper phosphate cement and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth in vitro: A comparative study. Caries Res 2003; 37: 416–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. The effect of fluoride on the stability of oral bacterial communities in vitro. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 668–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijken JWV, Persson S, Sjöström S. Presence of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli in saliva and on enamel, glass ionomer cement and composite resin surfaces. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99: 13–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar