Discomfort, expectations, and experiences during treatment of large overjet with Andresen Activator or Prefabricated Functional Appliance: a questionnaire survey

References

• Johnson PD, Cohen DA, Aiosa L, et al. Attitudes and compliance of pre adolescent children during early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:20–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egolf RJ, BeGole EA, Upshaw HS. Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:336–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund C, Feldmann I. Success rate, costs and long-term stability of treatment with activator/headgear combinations. Swed Dent J. 2016;40:67–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RG, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1985;12:179–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Idris G, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Acceptance and discomfort in growing patients during treatment with two functional appliances: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13:219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergl HG, Zentner A. A comparative assessment of acceptance of different types of functional appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:517–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattström V, Ingelsson M, Aberg E. Treatment co-operation in orthodontic patients. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gosney MB. An investigation into factors which may deter patients from undergoing orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1985;12:133–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones M, Chan C. The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:373–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll GM, Zentner A, Klages U, et al. Relationship between patient discomfort, appliance acceptance and compliance in orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61:398–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cirgic E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K, et al. Adolescents' experiences of using removable functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015;18:165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association WM. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirgic E, Kjellberg H, Hansen K. Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:516–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307:1805–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarger JB, James TA, Ashikaga T, et al. Characteristics in response rates for surveys administered to surgery residents. Surgery. 2013;154:38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seguin R, Godwin M, MacDonald S, et al. E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys. Can Fam Physician. 2004;50:414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch A, Witt E, Sahm G, et al. Correlates of objective patient compliance with removable appliance wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:378–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen M, Kahl-Nieke B, Pies S, et al. A retrospective examination of the acceptance of removable appliances. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1994;55:290–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavaliauskiene A, Smailiene D, Buskiene I, et al. Pain and discomfort perception among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: results from one month follow-up study. Stomatologija. 2012;14:118–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizell S, Svensson B, Tengstrom C, et al. Functional appliance treatment outcome and need for additional orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance. Swed Dent J. 2006;30:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepanian VF, Paulsson-Björnsson L, Kjellberg H. A long-term controlled follow-up study of objective treatment need on young adults treated with functional appliances. Swed Dent J. 2014;38:39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford TP. A multiple regression analysis of patient cooperation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:436–437.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw WC, Meek SC, Jones DS. Nicknames, teasing, harassment and the salience of dental features among school children. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:75–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seehra J, Fleming PS, Newton T, et al. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion,self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011;38:247–256. quiz 294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien C, Benson PE, Marshman Z. Evaluation of a quality of life measure for children with malocclusion. J Orthod 2007;34:185–193. discussion 176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari IK, Sonbol HN, et al. Bullying among Jordanian schoolchildren, its effects on school performance, and the contribution of general physical and dentofacial features. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144:872–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:488–494. discussion 494–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar