Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion – a systematic review

References

• Shpack N, Brosh T, Mazor Y, et al. Long- and short-term effects of headgear traction with and without the maxillary second molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146:467–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MP, Henriques JF, Freitas KM, et al. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014;19:44–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinzinger GS, Eren M, Diedrich PR. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:558–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:706–714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mariani L, Maino G, Caprioglio A. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprioglio A, Cafagna A, Fontana M, et al. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45:171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprioglio A, Fontana M, Longoni E, et al. Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuziy A, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Janson G, et al. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:502–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelieri F, Almeida RR, Almeida MR, et al. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu PP, McNamara JA, Jr, Franchi L. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaques-Asensi J, Kalra V. Effects of the pendulum appliance on the dentofacial complex. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:254–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod. 1997a;67:249–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussick TJ, McNamara JA Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:333–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA, Clar E, et al. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: the effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends. Angle Orthod. 1997b;67:261–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taner TU, Yukay F, Pehlivanoglu M, et al. A Comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-X appliance. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:686–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprioglio A, Cozzani M, Fontana M. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: segmented versus quad pendulum appliance. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Escobar SA, Tellez PA, Moncada CA, et al. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:545–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircelli BH, Pektaş ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:650–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sar C, Kaya B, Ozsoy O, et al. Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:460–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ozçirpici A, et al. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:339.e9–339.e17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onçag G, Seçkin O, Dinçer B, et al. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acar AG, Gürsoy S, Dinçer M. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marure PS, Patil RU, Reddy S, et al. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: a comparative study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016;34:331–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shashidhar NR, Reddy SR, Rachala MR. Comparison of K-loop molar distalization with that of pendulum appliance – a prospective comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZC20–ZC23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzinger GS, Fritz UB, Sander FG, et al. Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:8–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzinger G, Fuhrmann R, Gross U, et al. Modified pendulum appliance including distal screw and uprighting activation for non-compliance therapy of Class-II malocclusion in children and adolescents. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61:175–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinzinger GS, Gross U, Fritz UB, et al. Anchorage quality of deciduous molars versus premolars for molar distalization with a pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005a;127:314–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzinger GS, Wehrbein H, Diedrich PR. Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance – in vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2005b;75:558–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nappee-Mievilly M, Nappée FJ, Kerbrat JB, et al. The pendulis appliance: a palatal miniscrew supported molar distalization device. Orthod Fr. 2014;85:265–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fontana M, Cozzani M, Caprioglio A. Non-compliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: an overview of the last decade. Prog Orthod. 2012;13:173–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:1133–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grec RH, Janson G, Branco NC, et al. Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:602–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, et al. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1:176–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomized intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1–173.
   Google Scholar
• Wasiak J, Shen AY, Tan HB, et al. Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health. Clin Oral Invest. 2016;20:399–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar