Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin

References

• Alves FR, Almeida BM, Neves MA, et al. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches. J Endod. 2011;37:496–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahravan A, Haghdoost A-A, Adl A, et al. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2007;33:96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen BH, Wesselink PR, Turkun M. The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J. 1995;28:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, et al. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94:658–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int Endod J. 2010;43:2–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello I, Kammerer BA, Yoshimoto D, et al. Influence of final rinse technique on ability of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid of removing smear layer. J Endod. 2010;36:512–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, et al. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod. 2000;26:739–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikiforuk G, Sreebny L. Demineralization of hard tissues by organic chelating agents at neutral pH. J Dent Res. 1953;32:859–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballal NV, Kundabala M, Bhat KS, et al. A comparative in vitro evaluation of cytotoxic effects of EDTA and maleic acid: root canal irrigants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballal NV, Kandian S, Mala K, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2009;35:1573–1576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy ÖİA, Görgül G. Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion. Aust Endod J. 2013;39:66–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballal NV, Jain I, Tay FR. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and decalcification effect of QMix, maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentine. J Dent. 2016;51:62–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV, et al. The impact of root dentine conditioning on sealing ability and push-out bond strength of an epoxy resin root canal sealer. Int Endod J. 2011;44:491–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuruvilla A, Jaganath BM, Krishnegowda SC, et al. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using EDTA, etidronic acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18:247–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballal NV, Mala K, Bhat KS. Evaluation of decalcifying effect of maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentin using energy dispersive spectrometer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e78–e84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho AS, Camargo CHR, Valera MC, et al. Smear layer removal by auxiliary chemical substances in biomechanical preparation: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod. 2008;34:1396–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piperidou M, Sodhi R, Kolosowski K, et al. Effects of final irrigation with SMEAROFF™ 2-in-1 the surface and in the tubules of dentin using surface analytical methods. Am Assoc Endod. 2018;44:e14.
   Google Scholar
• Cury JA, Bragotto C, Valdrighi L. The demineralizing efficiency of EDTA solutions on dentin. I. Influence of pH. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981;52:446–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serper A, Calt S. The demineralizing effects of EDTA at different concentrations and pH. J Endod. 2002;28:501–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira CS, Felippe MCS, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J. 2005;38:285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ali M, Sathorn C, Parashos P. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols. Int Endod J. 2012;45:898–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh AA, Ettman WM. Effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on microhardness of root canal dentine. J Dent. 1999;27:43–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu W, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, et al. A scanning electron microscopic study of dentinal erosion by final irrigation with EDTA and NaOCl solutions. Int Endod J. 2002;35:934–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khademi A, Yazdizadeh M, Feizianfard M. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems. J Endod. 2006;32:417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello I, Robazza CRC, Antoniazzi JH, et al. Influence of different volumes of EDTA for final rinse on smear layer removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:e40–e43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-Deus G, Reis C, Paciornik S. Critical appraisal of published smear layer-removal studies: methodological issues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:531–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar