The influence of kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments on root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography: a systematic review

References

• McRay B, Cox TC, Cohenca N, et al. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files. Quintessence Int. 2014;45:101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30:559–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa-Rosa J, de Sousa-Neto MD, Versiani MA, et al. Shaping ability of single-file systems with different movements: a micro-computed tomographic study. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:228–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freire LG, Gavini G, Branco-Barletta F, et al. Microscopic computerized tomographic evaluation of root canal transportation prepared with twisted or ground nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112:e143–e148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1997;23:503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000;33:297–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semaan FS, Fagundes FS, Haragushiku G, et al. Endodontia mecanizada: a evolução dos sistemas rotatórios contínuos. Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia. 2009;6:297–309.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10:30–76.
   Google Scholar
• Santos MD, Marceliano MF, Silva E Souza PR. Evaluation of apical deviation in root canals instrumented with K3 and ProTaper systems. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14:460–464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008;41:339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang YH, Bae KS, Baek SH, et al. Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2014;40:1186–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XC, Zhu YQ. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by single twisted file in three different operation modes. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:515–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, et al. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod. 2015;41:548–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, et al. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014;40:852–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani V, Di Nasso L, Pace R, et al. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. J Endod. 2014;40:1468–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2015;48:109–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, et al. A methodology for quantitative evaluation of root canal instrumentation using microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001;34:390–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, The PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethem Yaylali I, Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B. Ultrasonically activated irrigation to remove calcium hydroxide from apical third of human root canal system: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Endod. 2015;41:1589–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sant’Anna Júnior A, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, et al. The effect of larger apical preparations in the danger zone of lower molars prepared using the Mtwo and Reciproc systems. J Endod. 2014;40:1855–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães LS, Gomes CC, Marceliano-Alves MF, et al. Preparation of oval-shaped canals with TRUShape and Reciproc systems: a micro-computed tomography study using contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017;43:1018–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Gu L, Cai Y, et al. In vitro study of shaping ability of single-file techniques in curved canals. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2014;49:657–661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siqueira JF, Jr, Alves FR, Versiani MA, et al. Correlative bacteriologic and micro-computed tomographic analysis of mandibular molar mesial canals prepared by self-adjusting file, Reciproc, and twisted file systems. J Endod. 2013;39:1044–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Silva EJ, et al. Micro-CT evaluation of non-instrumented canal areas with different enlargements performed by NiTi systems. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:624–629.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa-Neto MD, Fidel SR, et al. Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J. 2015;48:1129–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keleş A, Alçin H, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Supplementary steps for removing hard tissue debris from isthmus-containing canal systems. J Endod. 2016;42:1677–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanesco C, Só MV, Schmidt S, et al. Apical transportation, centering ratio, and volume increase after manual, rotary, and reciprocating instrumentation in curved root canals: analysis by micro-computed tomographic and digital subtraction radiography. J Endod. 2017;43:486–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmetoglu F, Keles A, Simsek N, et al. Comparative evaluation of root canal preparations of maxillary first molars with self-adjusting file, Reciproc single file, and revo-s rotary file: a micro-computed tomography study. Scanning 2015;37:218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, et al. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2015;48:162–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busquim S, Cunha RS, Freire L, et al. A micro-computed tomography evaluation of long-oval canal preparation using reciprocating or rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2015;48:1001–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, et al. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2014;40:1860–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek YB, Yoo HM, Park DS, et al. Comparison of the shaping abilities of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems using micro-computed tomography. J Dental Sci. 2014;9:111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern S, Patel S, Foschi F, et al. Changes in centering and shaping ability using three nickel–titanium instrumentation techniques analyzed by micro-computed tomography (μCT). Int Endod J. 2012;45:514–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011;37:1394–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You SY, Kim HC, Bae KS, et al. Shaping ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2011;37:1296–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L, et al. Micro-computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the self-adjusting file, Reciproc, WaveOne, and ProTaper universal systems. J Endod. 2013;39:1060–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espir CG, Nascimento-Mendes CA, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, et al.Shaping ability of rotary or reciprocating systems for oval root canal preparation: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:3189–3194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2018; 51:564–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2006;39:203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves FR, Almeida BM, Neves MA, et al. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches. J Endod. 2011;37:496–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergi R, Arbab-Chirani R, Osta N, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of canal transportation instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:1223–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giansiracusa Rubini A, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, et al. A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotino G, Giansiracusa Rubini A, Grande NM, et al. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod. 2014;40:1228–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando N, Hoshino E. Predominant obligate anaerobes invading the deep layers of root canal dentin. Int Endod J. 1990;23:20–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, et al. The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J. 2010;43:874–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho BS, Amaral RO, Leonardi DP, et al. Performance of three single instrument systems in the preparation of long oval canals. Braz Dent J. 2016;27:217–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuolo ML, De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of dentinal micro-cracks after root canal preparation with TRUShape and self-adjusting file systems. J Endod. 2017;43:619–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira AR, Siqueira JF, Jr, Ricucci D, et al. Dentinal tubule infection as the cause of recurrent disease and late endodontic treatment failure: a case report. J Endod. 2012;38:250–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich MA, Kirkpatrick TC, Yaccino JM. In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012;38:1140–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortoluzzi EA, Carlon D, Jr, Meghil MM, et al. Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals. J Dent. 2015;43:597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elayouti A, Chu AL, Kimionis I, et al. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals. Int Endod J. 2008;41:1088–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-Deus G. Research that matters – root canal filling and leakage studies. Int Endod J. 2012;45:1063–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar