Clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in the treatment of gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014;85:1333–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, et al. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2006;77:2070–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel JR, Tatakis DM. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008;79:425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. J Periodontol. 2010;81:1108–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo R, García V, Orsini M, et al. Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012;23:316–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Pellegrini G, et al. Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession: randomized trial assessing non-inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health-related quality of life. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:78–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, et al. Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft R®) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;27:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma DS, Alshihri A, Fontolliet A, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients. Clin Oral Invest. 2018;22:2111–2119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn RA, McClain PK, Charles A, et al. Evaluation of a porcine collagen matrix used to augment keratinized tissue and increase soft tissue thickness around existing dental implants. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2015;35:99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froum SJ, Khouly I, Tarnow DP, et al. The use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix at the time of implant placement to increase the volume of buccal soft tissue. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2015;35:179–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, et al. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013;84:914–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanaati S, Schlee M, Webber MJ, et al. Evaluation of the tissue reaction to a new bilayered collagen matrix in vivo and its translation to the clinic. Biomed Mater. 2011;6:015010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011; [cited 2018 Apr 10]. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, et al. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007;7:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey Literature Report. The New York Academy of Medicine; 2018 [cited 2018 May 15]. Available from: http://www.greylit.org
   Google Scholar
• Open Grey 2018; [cited 2018 May 15]. Available from: http://www.opengrey.eu
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;18:d5928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Smith GD. Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. London (UK): BMJ Books; 2003. p. 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Maiorana C, Pivetti L, Signorino F, et al. The efficacy of a porcine collagen matrix in keratinized tissue augmentation: a 5-year follow-up study. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;10:1.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Long-term results comparing xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous connective tissue grafts with coronally advanced flaps for treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. J Periodontol. 2016;87:221–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzio M, Błaszczyszyn A, Hadzik J, et al. Ultrasound assessment of soft tissue augmentation around implants in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft and xenogeneic collagen matrix – 1-year randomised follow-up. Ann Anat. 2018;217:129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:868–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, et al. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2011;31:367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reino DM, Maia LP, Fernandes PG, et al. A randomized comparative study of two techniques to optimize the root coverage using a porcine collagen matrix. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:445–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aroca S, Molnár B, Windisch P, et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:713–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, et al. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012;83:321–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, et al. Coronally advanced flap with and without a xenogenic collagen matrix in the treatment of multiple recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2014;34:s97–s102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, et al. Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:82–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira ARO, Santamaria MP, Silvério KG, et al. Coronally advanced flap with or without porcine collagen matrix for root coverage: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest. 2016;20:2539–2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiorgio JPM, Neves FLDS, Rocha Dos Santos M, et al. Xenogenous collagen matrix and/or enamel matrix derivative for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. Part I: clinical outcomes. J Periodontol. 2017;88:1309–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanini M, Jepsen K, de Sanctis M, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic evaluation of root coverage procedures: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:1132–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YF, Chen JW, Lin SJ, et al. Is coronally positioned flap procedure adjunct with enamel matrix derivative or root conditioning a relevant predictor for achieving root coverage? A systemic review. J Periodont Res. 2007;42:474–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming PS, Lynch CD, Pandis N. Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: common pitfalls and how to avoid them. J Dent. 2014;42:908–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, et al. Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research. J Dent. 2015;43:397–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgakopoulos G, Greenwell H, Hill M, et al. Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel to a coronally positioned flap approach. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1022–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucchelli G, Mele M, Mazzotti C, et al. Coronally advanced flap with and without vertical releasing incisions for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1083–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TV, et al. Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2018;89:1075–1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP, et al. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86:S52–S55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Schupbach P. A prospective, case-controlled study evaluating the use of enamel matrix derivative on human buccal recession defects: a human histologic examination. J Periodontol. 2016;87:645–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculean A, Windisch P, Szendröi-Kiss D, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative combined with a biphasic calcium phosphate for the treatment of human intrabony periodontal defects. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1991–1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculean A, Windisch P, Keglevich T, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2005;25:139–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SM, Choi YH, Kim YG, et al. Analysis of the esthetic outcome after root coverage procedures using a comprehensive approach. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26:107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucchelli G, Sharma P, Mounssif I. Esthetics in periodontics and implantology. Periodontol 2000. 2018;77:7–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambrone L, Pini Prato GP. Clinical insights about the evolution of root coverage procedures: the flap, the graft, and the surgery. J Periodontol. 2019;90:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatakis DN, Chambrone L. The effect of suturing protocols on coronally advanced flap root-coverage outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87:148–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, et al. The influence of tobacco smoking on the outcomes achieved by root-coverage procedures: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140:294–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva CO, de Lima AF, Sallum AW, et al. Coronally positioned flap for root coverage in smokers and non-smokers: stability of outcomes between 6 months and 2 years. J Periodontol. 2007;78:1702–1707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer RM, Wilson RF, Hasan AS, et al. Mechanisms of action of environmental factors: tobacco smoking. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:180–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar