Use of nanomaterials in dentistry: covariates of risk and benefit perceptions among dentists and dental hygienists in Norway

References

• Hulla JE, Sahu SC, Hayes AW. Nanotechnology: history and future. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015;34(12):1318–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Bhardwaj A, Misuriya A, et al. Nanotechnology in dentistry: present and future. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(1):121–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macoubrie J. Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci. 2006;15(2):221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani K, Ahmed W. Emerging nanotechnologies in dentistry. 1st ed. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Soares S, Sousa J, Pais A, et al. Nanomedicine: principles, properties, and regulatory issues. Front Chem. 2018;6:360–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padovani GC, Feitosa VP, Sauro S, et al. Advances in dental materials through nanotechnology: facts, perspectives and toxicological aspects. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(11):621–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlKahtani RN. The implications and applications of nanotechnology in dentistry: a review. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(2):107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosse Y, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, et al. Carcinogenicity of fluoro-edenite, silicon carbide fibres and whiskers, and carbon nanotubes. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(13):1427–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance ME, Kuiken T, Vejerano EP, et al. Nanotechnology in the real world: redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2015;6:1769–1780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit DB, Brown SC, Donner EM. Acute and subchronic oral toxicity studies in rats with nanoscale and pigment grade titanium dioxide particles. Food Chem Toxicol. 2015;84:208–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missaoui WN, Arnold RD, Cummings BS. Toxicological status of nanoparticles: what we know and what we don't know. Chem-Biol Interact. 2018;295:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohal IS, O’Fallon KS, Gaines P, et al. Ingested engineered nanomaterials: state of science in nanotoxicity testing and future research needs. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2018;15(1):29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosset E. The law of the European Union on nanotechnologies: comments on a paradox. Rev Eur. 2013;22(2):155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Iavicoli I, Leso V, Beezhold DH, et al. Nanotechnology in agriculture: opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;329:96–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccuni F, Ferrante R, Tombolini F, et al. Workers' exposure to nano-objects with different dimensionalities in R&D Laboratories: measurement strategy and field studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pligt J. Risk perception and self-protective behavior. Eur Psychol. 1996;1(1):34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA. Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res. 2010;12(8):2703–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Giesen RI, Fischer ARH, van Trijp H. Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: a longitudinal survey study. Public Underst Sci. 2018;27(2):168–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley JC, McComas KA. Something old and something new: comparing views about nanotechnology and nuclear energy. J Risk Res. 2015;18(2):215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ. Ethics, risk and benefits associated with different applications of nanotechnology: a comparison of expert and consumer perceptions of drivers of societal acceptance. Nanoethics. 2015;9(2):93–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie CEH, et al. Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies (vol 4, pg 752, 2009). Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4(11):752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, et al. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4(2):87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley J. Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology. Emerg Health Threats J. 2010;3:e8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, et al. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal. 2007;27(1):59–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra AM, Critchley CR. Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafes: public risk perceptions contextualised. Public Underst Sci. 2016;25(1):71–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capon A, Rolfe M, Gillespie J, et al. Are Australians concerned about nanoparticles? A comparative analysis with established and emerging environmental health issues. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39(1):56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho SS, Scheufele DA, Corley EA. Value predispositions, mass media, and attitudes toward nanotechnology: the interplay of public and experts. Sci Commun. 2011;33(2):167–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekli E, Şahin N. Science teachers and teacher candidates’ basic knowledge, opinions and risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Proc – Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):2667–2670.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Corley EA. From enabling technology to applications: the evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci. 2011;20(3):385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimpour M, Rahimpour M, Gomari H, et al. Public perceptions of nanotechnology: a survey in the mega cities of Iran. Nanoethics. 2012;6(2):119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles EL, Kuznesof S, Clark B, et al. Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review. J Nanopart Res. 2015;17(12):467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer ARH, van Dijk H, de Jonge J, et al. Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production. Public Underst Sci. 2013;22(7):817–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder AR, Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, et al. Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science. Public Underst Sci. 2012;21(7):830–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest SH, Greenhalgh T. Nanotechnology as an experiment in democracy: how do citizens form opinions about technology and policy? J Nanopart Res. 2011;13(4):1521–1531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, AA, Kim, J. Scheufele, DA, et al. What's in a name? How we define nanotech shapespublic reactions. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, SS, Scheufele, DA, Corley, EA. Factors influencing public risk–benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing. Public Underst Sci. 2013;22(5):606–623. doi:10.1177/0963662511417936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capon, A, Gillespie, J. Rolfe, M, et al. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies andtrust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, governmentand business attitudes. Bmc Public Health. 2015.
   Google Scholar