Anaesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine with different concentrations of epinephrine (1:80,000 and 1:200,000) in intraligamentary injection after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized double-blind study

References

• Hargreaves KM, Keiser K. Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: mechanisms and management. Endod Topics. 2002;1:26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Meechan JG. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int Endod J. 2002;35:885–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Singla M, Subbiya A, et al. Effect of preoperative pain on inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog. 2015;62:135–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Jain A, Debipada K. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine following an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2009;35:925–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argueta-Figueroa L, Arzate-Sosa G, Mendieta-Zeron H. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic versus asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Gen Dent. 2012;60:e39–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Singla M, Rizvi A, et al. Comparative evaluation of local infiltration of articaine, articaine plus ketorolacand dexamethasone on anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2011;37:445–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster S Jr, Drum M, Reader A, et al. How Effective Is Supplemental Intraseptal Anesthesia in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis? J Endod. 2016;42:1453–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visconti RP, Tortamano IP, Buscariolo IA. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of mepivacaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2016;42:1314–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatchi M, Shafiee M, Khademi A, et al. Anesthetic efficacy of gow-gates nerve block, inferior alveolar nerve block, and their combination in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2018;44:384–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012;38:421–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore PA, Cuddy MA, Cooke MR, et al. Periodontal ligament and intraosseous anesthetic injection techniques: alternatives to mandibular nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:13S–18S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malamed SF. The periodontal ligament (PDL) injection: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53:117–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Endo T, Gabka J, Taubenheim L. Intraligamentary anesthesia: benefits and limitations. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:e15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GN, Walton RE. Periodontal ligament injection: distribution of injected solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55:232–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, et al. Does the volume of supplemental intraligamentary injections affect the anaesthetic success rate after a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block? A randomized-double blind clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2018;51:5–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin J, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusstein J, Berlin J, Reader A, et al. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. Anesth Prog. 2004;51:126–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meechan JG. A comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for intraligamentary anesthesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:469–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman E, LeResche L, Sommers E, et al. Intraligamentary anesthesia: a double-blind comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;108:175–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GK, Hlava GL, Kalkwarf KL. A comparison of periodontal intraligamental anesthesia using etidocaine HCl and lidocaine HCl. Anesth Prog. 1985;32:202–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, et al. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine administered as supplementary intraligamentary injection after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block: a randomized double-blind study. J Endod. 2019;45:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft MW, Parker SR. An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain. 1984;19:153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore KD, Reader A, Meyers WJ, et al. A comparison of the periodontal ligament injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and saline in human mandibular premolars. Anesth Prog. 1987;34:181–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochman MN, Friedman MJ, Williams W, et al. Interstitial tissue pressure associated with dental injections: a clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2006;37:469–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roahen JO, Marshall FJ. The effects of periodontal ligament injection on pulpal and periodontal tissues. J Endod. 1990;16:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson JE, Matsson L, Nation W. Cementum and epithelial attachment response to the sulcular and periodontal ligament injection techniques. Pediatr Dent. 1983;5:257–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Froum SJ, Tarnow D, Caiazzo A, et al. Histologic response to intraligament injections using a computerized local anesthetic delivery system. A pilot study in mini-swine. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1453–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray RJ, Lomax AM, Rood JP. Periodontal ligament injection: alternative solutions. Anesth Prog. 1990;37:293–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray RJ, Lomax AM, Rood JP. Periodontal ligament injection: with or without a vasoconstrictor? Br Dent J. 1987;162:263–265. 11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberg G. Studies on the duration of local anesthesia: a possible mechanism for the prolonging effect of “vasoconstrictors” on the duration of infiltration anesthesia. Int J Oral Surg. 1980;9:144–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naftalin LW, Yagiela JA. Vasoconstrictors: indications and precautions. Dent Clin North Am. 2002;46:733–746. Oct
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perusse R, Goulet JP, Turcotte JY. Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry, part I: cardiovascular diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74:679–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goulet JP, PéRusse RN, Turcotte JY. Contraindications to vasoconstrictors in dentistry, part III: pharmacologic interactions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74:692–697.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zarei M, Ghoddusi J, Sharifi E, et al. Comparison of the anaesthetic efficacy of and heart rate changes after periodontal ligament or intraosseous X-Tip injection in mandibular molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2012;45:921–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GN, Pashley DH. Periodontal ligament injection: evaluation of systemic effects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;56:571–574.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar