A randomized clinical trial of hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy in primary molars with 1 year follow-up

References

• Smaïl-Faugeron V, Glenny AM, Courson F, et al. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD003220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bossù M, Iaculli F, Di Giorgio G, et al. Different pulp dressing materials for the pulpotomy of primary teeth: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Dlaigan YH. Pulpotomy medicaments used in deciduous dentition: an update. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(6):486–503.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun HW, Feigal RJ, Messer HH. Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde and formaldehydein relation to time of exposure and concentration. Pediatr Dent. 1990;12(5):303–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis B. The obsolescence of formocresol. Br Dent J. 2009;207(11):525–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuks AB, Eidelman E C-J, et al. Pulp response to ferric sulfate, diluted formocresol and IRM in pulpotomized primary baboon teeth. J Dent Child. 1997;64:254–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou E, Roth M, Karakiulakis G. Hyaluronic acid: a key molecule in skin aging. Dermatoendocrinol. 2012;4(3):253–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casale M, Moffa A, Vella P, et al. Hyaluronic acid: Perspectives in dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2016;29(4):572–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosu S, Montanaro F, Rosu A, et al. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group multicentre study on the efficacy and tolerability of a non-medicated, patented gel for the relief of teething symptoms in infants. Ital J Dent Med. 2017;2:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida LDF, Babo PS, Silva CR, et al. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels incorporating platelet lysate enhance human pulp cell proliferation and differentiation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018;29(6):88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz E, Tosun G. Evaluation of formocresol, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulfate, and MTA primary molar pulpotomies. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(2):234–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Meligy OAES, Alamoudi NM, Allazzam SM, et al. BiodentineTM versus formocresol pulpotomy technique in primary molars: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sealed Envelope Ltd. 2012. Power calculator for binary outcome equivalence trial; [cited 2021 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/binary-equivalence/.
   Google Scholar
• Fuks AB, Kupıetzky A, Guelmann M. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pinkham JR, ed. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Markovic D, Zivojinovic V, Vucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6(3):133–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonmez D, Sari S, Cetinbaş T. A comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. J Endod. 2008;34(8):950–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem AP, Guven Y, Balli B, et al. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:165–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez CC, Martinez SS, Jimeno FG, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(6):400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havale R, Anegundi RT, Indushekar K, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013;12(1):24–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durmus B, Tanboga I. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(5):289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juneja P, Kulkarni S. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(4):271–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali Z, Alavi V, Najafpour E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of pulpotomy in primary molars using MTA and formocresol compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(5):361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asl Aminabadi N, Satrab S, Najafpour E, et al. A randomized trial of direct pulp capping in primary molars using MTA compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel pulp capping biomaterial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(4):281–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminabadi NA, Huang B, Samiei M, et al. A randomized trial using 3Mixtatin compared to MTA in primary molars with inflammatory root resorption: a novel endodontic biomaterial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junqueira MA, Cunha NNO, Caixeta FF, et al. Clinical, radiographic and histological evaluation of primary teeth pulpotomy using MTA and ferric sulfate. Braz Dent J. 2018;29(2):159–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camp JH. Diagnosis dilemmas in vital pulp therapy: treatment for the toothache is changing, especially in young, immature teeth. J Endod. 2008;34:6–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard RM. Radiographic changes following formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child. 1976;43(6):414–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(3):192–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, et al. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long-term follow up. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(5):327–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki T, Watanabe C. Stimulation of osteoinduction in bone wound healing by high-molecular hyaluronic acid. Bone. 1995;16(1):9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogovic A, Nizetic J, Galic N, et al. The effects of hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxide, and dentin adhesive on rat odontoblasts and fibroblasts. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2011;62:155–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T, Kawamata-Kido H. Providing an environment for reparative dentin induction in amputated rat molar pulp by high molecular-weigth hyaluronic acid. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40(3):209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahfouz SM, Abdallah A, El-Desouky SS. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of hyaluronic acid as a vital pulpotomy medication in primary molars. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(3):1843–1855.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadian E, Eftekhari A, Dizaj SM, et al. The effect of hyaluronic acid hydrogels on dental pulp stem cells behavior. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;140:245–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayaka WL, Zhang C. Scaffold-based and scaffold-free strategies in dental pulp regeneration. J Endod. 2020;46(9):81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar