Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic activation during endodontic treatment: a Meta-analysis of in vitro studies

References

• Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, et al. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1361–1366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricucci D, Siqueira JF. Jr. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod. 2010;36(1):1–15. Jan
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban K, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, et al. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(9):2681–2687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, et al. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod. 2013;39(11):1456–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6(4):142–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okşan T, Aktener B, Şen B, et al. The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinai tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 1993;26(5):301–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, et al. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1569–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dioguardi M, Gioia GD, Illuzzi G, et al. Endodontic irrigants: Different methods to improve efficacy and related problems. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(3):459–466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35(6):791–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good ML, McCammon A. An removal of gutta-percha and root canal sealer: a literature review and an audit comparing current practice in dental schools. Dent Update. 2012;39(10):703–708.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, Duarte MA, et al. Efficacy of xylene and passive ultrasonic irrigation on remaining root filling material during retreatment of anatomically complex teeth. Int Endod J. 2014;47(11):1078–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, et al. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40(6):415–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozo S, Llena C, Forner L. Review of ultrasonic irrigation in endodontics: increasing action of irrigating solutions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(3):e512–e516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva E, Rover G, Belladonna FG, et al. Effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation on periapical healing and root canal disinfection: a systematic review. Br Dent J. 2019;227(3):228–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Căpută PE, Retsas A, Kuijk L, et al. Ultrasonic irrigant activation during root canal treatment: a systematic Review. J Endod. 2019;45(1):31–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira RN, Pinto EB, Galo R, et al. Passive ultrasonic irrigation in root canal: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(1):55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendrababu V, Jayaraman J, Suresh A, et al. Effectiveness of ultrasonically activated irrigation on root canal disinfection: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(2):655–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, for the PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339(jul21 1):b2535–b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochr Collabor. 2008. Version 5.1.0. p. 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Krithikadatta J, Gopikrishna V, Datta M. CRIS guidelines (checklist for reporting in-vitro studies): a concept note on the need for standardized guidelines for improving quality and transparency in reporting in-vitro studies in experimental dental research. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(4):301–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien J, Cenci M, et al. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2014;39(1):E31–E44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moraes A, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moraes R, et al. Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and Meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent. 2015;40(6):567–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Goncalves AP, et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and Meta-analysis. International Journal of Adhesion. 2016;69:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in Meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcay M, Arslan H, Mese M, et al. The effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, ultrasonically and sonically irrigation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a resin sealer to the root dentin. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):1055–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcay M, Arslan H, Mese M, et al. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, passive ultrasonic, and sonic irrigation techniques on dentinal tubule penetration of irrigation solution: a confocal microscopic study. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(7):2205–2212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan H, Akcay M, Capar ID, et al. An in vitro comparison of irrigation using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming, ultrasonic, sonic and needle techniques in removing calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 2015;48(3):246–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary AF, Purra AR, et.al. Ultrasonic versus sonic activation of the final irrigant in root canals instrumented with rotary files: an in-vitro stereomicroscopic analysis. IJRR. 2019;6(12):22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Conde AJ, Estevez R, Loroño G, et al. Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Int Endod J. 2017;50(10):976–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galler KM, Grubmüller V, Schlichting R, et al. Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation. Int Endod J. 2019;52(8):1210–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokturk H, Ozkocak I, Buyukgebiz F, et al. Effectiveness of various irrigation protocols for the removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial standardized grooves. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(3):290–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Perinpanayagam H, Kum DJ, et al. Effect of different agitation techniques on the penetration of irrigant and sealer into dentinal tubules. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35(2):71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Zou T, Li D, et al. Effectiveness of sonic, ultrasonic, and Photon-Induced photoacoustic streaming activation of NaOCl on filling material removal following retreatment in oval canal anatomy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas E, Ozsu D, Arslan H, et al. Comparison of the effect of nonactivated self-adjusting file system, vibringe, EndoVac, ultrasonic and needle irrigation on apical extrusion of debris. Int Endod J. 2015;48(4):317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalap ND, Kokate S, Hegde V. Ultrasonic versus sonic activation of the final irrigant in root canals instrumented with rotary/reciprocating files: an in-vitro scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(4):368–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khaord P, Amin A, Shah MB, et al. Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molar: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(4):321–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klyn SL, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2010;36(8):1367–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macías D, Bravo V, Echeverri D. Effect of sonic versus ultrasonic activation on aqueous solution penetration in root canal dentin. J Oral Res. 2017;6:12–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz-Pardo M, Estevez R, Pablo ÓV, et al. Root canal penetration of a sodium hypochlorite mixture using sonic or ultrasonic activation. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(6):489–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiesse PEB, Silva-Sousa YT, Pereira RD, et al. Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2018;51(1):102–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz A, Yalcin TY, Helvacioglu-Yigit D. Effectiveness of various final irrigation techniques on sealer penetration in curved roots: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8060489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiVito E, Lloyd A. ER: YAG laser for 3-dimensional debridement of canal systems: use of photon-induced photoacoustic streaming. Dent Today. 2012;31(11):122, 124–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolles JA, He J, Svoboda KK, et al. Comparison of vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth. J Endod. 2013;39(5):708–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2012;38(4):445–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karade P, Chopade R, Patil S, et al. Efficiency of different endodontic irrigation and activation systems in removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(4):414–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh A, Aminsobhani M, Sohrabi K, et al. Penetration depth of sodium hypochlorite in dentinal tubules after conventional irrigation, passive ultrasonic agitation and Nd:YAG laser activated irrigation. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(2):105–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, et al. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Endod. 2007;33(2):96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J. 2005;38(5):285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paqué F, Luder H, Sener B, et al. Tubular sclerosis rather than the smear layer impedes dye penetration into the dentine of endodontically instrumented root canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39(1):18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Chandra A, Tikku AP, et al. A comparative evaluation of different irrigation activation systems on smear layer removal from root canal: an in-vitro scanning electron microscope study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(2):159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oral I, Guzel H, Ahmetli G. Determining the mechanical properties of epoxy resin (DGEBA) composites by ultrasonic velocity measurement. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;127(3):1667–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittmann B, Haupert F, Schlarb AK. Ultrasonic dispersion of inorganic nanoparticles in epoxy resin. Ultrason Sonochem. 2009;16(5):622–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsani S, Bolhari B, Etemadi A, et al. The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the push-out bond strength of RealSeal self-etch sealer. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31(12):578–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghiri MA, Shokouhinejad N, Lotfi M, et al. Push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of alkaline pH. J Endod. 2010;36(11):1856–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar