Self-perception of orofacial appearance: Brazil–Finland cross-national study

References

• Talarico G, Morgante E. The human dimension: esthetics in society and in medicine. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8:136–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson P, Bondemark L, Haggman-Henrikson B. The impact of oro-facial appearance on oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48(3):271–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A Meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):390–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann MC, Krings F, Zebrowitz LA, et al. Age bias in selection decisions: the role of facial appearance and fitness impressions. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz LA, Montepare JM. Social psychological face perception: why appearance matters. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(3):1497–1517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahab A, Ju X, Jamieson L, et al. Modelling risk factors for high/low Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) in the Australian adults. Eur J Orthod. 2020;43(2):200–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaji S, Balaji P. Psychological desire of facial esthetics in males. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019;9(2):326–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinez JE, Funk F, Todorov A. Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment. Behav Res. 2020;52(4):1428–1444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos LA, Costa MA, Bonafe FSS, et al. Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics on dental patients. Int Dent J. 2020;70(5):321–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong S, Liang X, Kumada T, et al. Learning the cultural consistent facial aesthetics by convolutional neural network. 2017 International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture and Computing). Kyoto (Japan): IEEE; 2017. p. 97–103. doi:10.1109/culture.and.computing.2017.53.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham MR, Roberts AR, Barbee AP, et al. “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68(2):261–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson P, John MT, Nilner K, et al. Development of an Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(3):249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klages U, Claus N, Wehrbein H, et al. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(2):103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos LA, Maroco J, John MT, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos LA, Kämäräinen M, Silvola AS, et al. Orofacial Esthetic Scale and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire: development and psychometric properties of the Finnish version. Acta Odontol Scand. 2021;79(5):335–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalj S, Lajnert V, Ivankovic L. The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire–translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(4):1267–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, He SL. Development of the Chinese version of the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(9):670–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John MT, Larsson P, Nilner K, et al. Validation of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in the general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucci R, Rongo R, Zito E, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). Qual Life Res. 2015;24(3):747–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimbashi V, Čelebić A, Staka G, et al. Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhajj MN, Amran AG, Halboub E, et al. Development, validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Ar. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(3):290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persic S, Milardovic S, Mehulic K, et al. Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetselaar P, Koutris M, Visscher CM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-NL) in dental patients with and without self-reported tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(11):803–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami V, Barron D. Translation and validation of body image instruments: challenges, good practice guidelines, and reporting recommendations for test adaptation. Body Image. 2019;31:204–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen NK, Masa RD. Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: a guide for social work researchers. J Soc Work Res. 2015;6(2):229–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden ACL. Consumed by prestige: the mouth, consumerism and the dental profession. Med Health Care Philos. 2020;23(2):261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin B, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Hoboken (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sardenberg F, Oliveira AC, Paiva SM, et al. Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(3):270–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reissmann DR. Methodological considerations when measuring oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48(3):233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte S, Elsworth GR. Factorial invariance. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; 2014. p. 311.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen TD, Pornprasertmanit S, Schoemann SAM, et al. semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-4; 2021. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semTools/semTools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marôco J. Análise estatística com o SPSS statistics. 7th ed. Pêro Pinheiro (Portugal): ReportNumber; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Luzzi L, Chrisopoulos S, et al. Dentist-patient relationships and oral health impact in Australian adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48(4):309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbis E, Kim C. Body dysmorphic disorder and addiction to medical aesthetic procedures. J Aesthet Nurs. 2017;6(9):472–475.
   Google Scholar
• Alhajj MN, Ariffin Z, Celebic A, et al. Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson TL, Grunert C, Katz A, et al. Aesthetic capital: a research review on beauty perks and penalties. Sociol Compass. 2010;4(8):564–575.
   Google Scholar