Quantitative parameters of digital occlusal analysis in dental implant supported restorative reconstruction recent 5 years: a systematic review

References

• Koyano K, Esaki D. Occlusion on oral implants: current clinical guidelines. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(2):153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Bajracharya S, et al. Management of obstructive sleep apnea with implant retained mandibular advancement device. World J Dent. 2014;5(3):184–189.
   Google Scholar
• Rokaya D, Srimaneepong V, Wisitrasameewon W, et al. Peri-implantitis update: risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(4):672–682.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient’s satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(3):220–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller F, Hernandez M, Grütter L, et al. Masseter muscle thickness, chewing efficiency and bite force in edentulous patients with fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses: a cross-sectional multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(2):144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll P, Hou L, Radaideh H, et al. Oral health-related outcomes in edentulous patients treated with mandibular Implant-Retained dentures versus complete dentures: systematic review with meta-analyses. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(4):313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury-Ribas L, Ayuso-Montero R, Willaert E, et al. Do implant-supported fixed partial prostheses improve masticatory performance in patients with unilateral posterior missing teeth? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(5):420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(2):223–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varga S, Spalj S, Lapter Varga M, et al. Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthodont. 2011;33(4):427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):808–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotfredsen K. A 10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(1):80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4):347–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goh EXJ, Lim LP. Implant maintenance for the prevention of biological complications: are you ready for the next challenge? J Invest Clin Dent. 2017;8(4):e12251.
   Google Scholar
• Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, et al. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):839–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):828–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte W. Implants and the periodontium. Int Dent J. 1995;45(1):16–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(1):26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarfaraz H, Paulose A, Shenoy KK, et al. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15(3):229–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(1):S60–S8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheridan RA, Decker AM, Plonka AB, et al. The role of occlusion in implant therapy: a comprehensive updated review. Implant Dent. 2016;25(6):829–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, et al. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses. A review. Int Dent J. 2008;58(3):139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves CV, Harrel SK, Rossmann JA, et al. The role of occlusion in the dental implant and peri-implant condition: a review. Open Dent J. 2016;10:594–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without Meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2019. p. 321–347.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Li T, Deeks JJ. Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2019. p. 143–176.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Wongpairojpanich J, Sareethammanuwat M, et al. Digital occlusal analysis of pre and post single posterior implant restoration delivery: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0252191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe M, Wada M, Maeda Y, et al. Ability to adjust occlusal force in implant-supported overdenture wearers. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65(1):106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, et al. Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(3):312–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbua P, Aunmeungtong W, Khongkhunthian P. Computerised occlusal analysis of mini-dental implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year prospective clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(6):757–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Q, Ding Q, Zhang L, et al. Analyzing the occlusion variation of single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses by using the T-scan system: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. J Prosth Dent. 2020;123(1):79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang YF, Chang CT, Muo CH, et al. The association of variables of fibular reconstructed mandible and bite force in oral cancer patients with dental implant rehabilitation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(11):1979–1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmel M, Memedi K, Parga T, et al. Masticatory performance and maximum bite and lip force depend on the type of prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(6):565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AJ, Nagrath R, Lahori M. A comparative evaluation of chewing efficiency, masticatory bite force, and patient satisfaction between conventional denture and implant-supported mandibular overdenture: an in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017;17(4):361–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madani AS, Nakhaei M, Alami M, et al. Post-insertion posterior single-implant occlusion changes at different intervals: a T-Scan computerized occlusal analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(10):927–932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alzoubi F, Bedrossian E, Wong A, et al. Outcomes assessment of treating completely edentulous patients with a fixed Implant-Supported profile prosthesis utilizing a graftless approach. Part 1: clinically related outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(4):897–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuder T, Yunus N, Sulaiman E, et al. Association between occlusal force distribution in implant overdenture prostheses and residual ridge resorption. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(5):398–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque MA, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Occlusal pressure redistribution with single implant restorations. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(4):275–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsyad MA, Khairallah AS. Chewing efficiency and maximum bite force with different attachment systems of implant overdentures: a crossover study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(6):677–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkling N, Saftig M, Worni A, et al. Chewing efficiency, bite force and oral health-related quality of life with narrow diameter implants - a prospective clinical study: results after one year. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28(4):476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosth Dent. 1999;81(1):39–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch JP, Shinkai RS, Sakai S, et al. Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults. Arch Oral Biol. 2001;46(7):641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertman ME, Slagter AP, van Waas MA, et al. Comminution of food with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res. 1994;73(12):1858–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A, et al. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res. 2000;79(7):1519–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton JP, McManus FC, Menhenick S. Jaw muscles in older overdenture patients. Gerodontology. 2004;21(1):37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, et al. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12):154S–160s.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(1):156–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu YT, Fu JH, Al-Hezaimi K, et al. Biomechanical implant treatment complications: a systematic review of clinical studies of implants with at least 1 year of functional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(4):894–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium 1994;15(11):1330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duyck J, Vandamme K. The effect of loading on peri-implant bone: a critical review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41(10):783–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naert I, Duyck J, Vandamme K. Occlusal overload and bone/implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang M, Chronopoulos V, Mattheos N. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013;4(3):142–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G, et al. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns. J Prosth Dent. 2015;114(3):358–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, et al. Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance. Clin Oral Invest. 2012;16(1):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary F, Mahallati R, Bahat O, et al. Lifelong craniofacial growth and the implications for osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(1):163–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattelli A, Artese L, Penitente E, et al. Osteocyte density in the peri-implant bone of implants retrieved after different time periods (4 weeks to 27 years). J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):239–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B, Östman PO, et al. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezende CE, Borges AF, Gonzaga CC, et al. Effect of cement space on stress distribution in Y-TZP based crowns. Dent Mater. 2017;33(2):144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater. 2005;21(3):242–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza RF, Ribeiro AB, Della Vecchia MP, et al. Mini vs. Standard implants for mandibular overdentures: a randomized Trial. J Dent Res. 2015;94(10):1376–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aunmeungtong W, Kumchai T, Strietzel FP, et al. Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implants and mini dental implants for mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(2):328–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, et al. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2: a methodical study using five types of attachment. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2001;12(6):640–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, et al. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 1: in vivo verification of stereolithographic model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(6):617–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar