Subjective outcomes after knee arthroplasty

References

• Aichroth P, Freeman M A R, Smillie I S, Souter W A. A knee function assessment chart. From the British Ortho-paedic Association Research Sub-Committee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1978; 60-B (3): 308–9.
   Google Scholar
• Amendola A, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, Apyan PM. To-tal knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4 (Suppl): S11–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson J G, Wixson R L, Tsai D, Stulberg S D, Chang R W. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (7): 831–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apley A G. An assessment of assessment [editorial]. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990; 72 (6): 957–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong R A, Whiteside LA. Results of cementless total knee arthroplasty in an older rheumatoid arthritis popu-lation. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6 (4): 357–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asch D A, Christakis NA. Different response rates in a tri-al of two envelop styles in mail survey research. Epide-miology 1994; 5 (3): 364–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrack R L, Smith P, Munn B, Engh G, Rorabeck C. The Ranawat Award. Comparison of surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998; (356): 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Barrack R L, Wolfe MW, Waldman D A, Milicic M, Bertot A J, Myers L. Resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997; 79(8): 1121–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D E, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50 (1): 79–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989; 18 (4 Suppl 2): 14–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy N. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clini-cal trials. J Rheumatol Suppl 1995; 43 :49–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan W W. Outcome measurement in os-teoarthritis clinical trials: the case for standardisation. Clin Rheumatol 1984; 3 (3): 293–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, Campbell J, Stitt L W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in pa-tients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15 (12): 1833–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Goldsmith C H, Buchanan W W, Campbell J, Duku E. Prior score availability: observations using the WOMAC osteoarthritis index [letter]. Br J Rheumatol 1991; 30 (2): 150–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellamy N, Kean W F, Buchanan W W, Gerecz-Simon E, Campbell J. Double blind randomized controlled trial of sodium meclofenamate (Meclomen) and diclofenac so-dium (Voltaren): post validation reapplication of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol 1992; 19 (1): 153–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson S, Knutson K. The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1991; 62(4): 301–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of infected knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57 (6): 489–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtson S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Treatment of infected knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; (245): 173–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbin RA, Carter W B, Gilson B S. The Sick-ness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19 (8): 787–805.
   Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measure-ment. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Measurement error and correla-tion coefficients. BMJ 1996; 313 (7048): 41–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997; 314 (7080): 572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bombardier C, Melfi C A, Paul J, Green R, Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P. Comparison of a generic and a dis-ease-specific measure of pain and physical function af-ter knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995; 33 (4 Suppl): AS131–44.
   Google Scholar
• Braeken AM, Lochhaas-Gerlach J A, Gollish J D, Myles J D, Mackenzie TA. Determinants of 6-12 month postop-erative functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement . Int J Qual Health Care 1997; 9 (6): 413–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Jones N, Kind P. Testing the validity of the Euro-qol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey ques-tionnaire. Qual Life Res 1993; 2 (3): 169–80.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J E, Harper R, Jones N M, O'Cathain A, Thomas K J, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care . BMJ 1992; 305 (6846): 160–4.
   Google Scholar
• Brinker M R, Lund P J, Barrack R L. Demographic biases of scoring instruments for the results of total knee ar-throplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997; 79(6): 858–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown L. The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan C M, Drake B G, Heck D A, Dittus R S. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee re-placement. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 271 (17): 1349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centor R M. Signal detectability: the use of ROC curves and their analyses. Med Decis Making 1991; 11 (2): 102–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Spring-er-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach L J, Meehl, P.E. Construct validity in psycholog-ical tests. Psych Bull 1955; 52 : 281–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiano A M. Sickness Impact Profile user's manual and interpretation guide. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the per-ceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996a; 78 (4): 593–600.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Can A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replace-ment . J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996b; 78 (2): 185–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Can A. The problem of "noise" in monitoring patient-based outcomes: gener-ic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for to-tal hip replacement. J Health Serv Res Policy 1996c; 1 (4): 224–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Can A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replace-ment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80 (1): 63–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descartes R. A Discourse on Method: Meditations and Principles. Guernsey Press Company Limited, Guern-sey, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Deyo R A, Centor R M. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diag-nostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39 (11): 897–906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deyo R A, Inui T S, Leininger J D, Overman S S. Measur-ing functional outcomes in chronic disease: a compari-son of traditional scales and a self-administered health status questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthri-tis. Med Care 1983; 21(2): 180–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fabio R P, Boissonnault W. Physical therapy and health-related outcomes for patients with common orthopaedic di-agnoses. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27 (3): 219–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42(4): 609–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake B G, Callahan C M, Dittus R S, Wright J G. Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty out-comes. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9(4): 409–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelberg R, Martin D P, Agel J, Obremsky W, Coronado G, Swiontkowski M F. Musculoskeletal Function As-sessment instrument: criterion and construct validity. J Orthop Res 1996; 14 (2): 182–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht E. Sliding prosthesis, a partial prosthesis in destructive processes of the knee joint. Chirurg 1971; 42 (11): 510–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essink-Bot M L, Krabbe P F, Bonsel G J, Aaronson N K. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short- Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care 1997; 35 (5): 522–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fehring T K, Valadie AL. Knee instability after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994; (299): 157–62.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein A R. Clinimetrics. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Franzen H, Johnsson R, Nilsson L T. Impaired quality of life 10 to 20 years after primary hip arthroplasty. J Ar-throplasty 1997; 12 (1): 21–4.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman M A, Levack B. British contribution to knee ar-throplasty. Clin Orthop 1986; (210): 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Ware J E, Aaronson N K, Apolone G, Bjorner J B, Brazier J E, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1171–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement. A comparison between the Harris hip score and the Nottingham Health Profile. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80 (4): 600–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gluck T. Die Invaginationsmethode der Osteo- und Arthro-plastick. Berl Klin Wschr 1890; 19: 732.
   Google Scholar
• Gross M. A critique of the methodologies used in clinical studies of hip-joint arthroplasty published in the En-glish-language orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988; 70(9): 1364–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural ad-aptation of health-related quality of life measures: litera-ture review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 (12): 1417–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gunston F H. Polycentric knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1971; 53 (2): 272–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40 (2): 171–8.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt G H. The philosophy of health-related quality of life translation. Qual Life Res 1993; 2 (6): 461–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley J A, McNeil B J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143 (1): 29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Com-parison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universi-ties Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheuma-tol 1995; 22(6): 1193–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P, Paul J, Dittus R, Croxford R, Katz B, Bombardier C, Heck D, Freund D. Health-relat-ed quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998; 80 (2): 163–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays R D, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric consider-ations in evaluating health-related quality of life mea-sures. Qual Life Res 1993; 2 (6): 441–9.
   Google Scholar
• Heck D A, Robinson R L, Partridge C M, Lubitz R M, Fre-und D A. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1998; (356): 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hilding M B, Bäckbro B, Ryd L. Quality of life after knee arthroplasty. A randomized study of 3 designs in 42 pa-tients, compared after 4 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (2): 156–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hill A, Roberts J, Ewings P, Gunnell D. Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey. J Public Health Med 1997; 19 (2): 203–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch H S, Lotke PA, Morrison L D. The posterior cruci-ate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute? Clin Orthop 1994; (309): 64–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hoher J, Bach T, Munster A, Bouillon B, Tiling T. Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (5): 642–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt S M, McKenna S P, McEwen J, Backett E M, Will-iams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Communi-ty Health 1980; 34(4): 281–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt S M, McKenna S P, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med [A] 1981a; 15: 221–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt S M, McKenna S P, Williams J. Reliability of a popu-lation survey tool for measuring perceived health prob-lems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemi-ol Community Health 1981b; 35 (4): 297–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst N P, Kind P, Ruta D, Hunter M, Stubbings A. Mea-suring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthri-tis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36 (5): 551–9.
   Google Scholar
• Insall J N, Ranawat C S, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1976; 58 (6): 754–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insall J, Scott W N, Ranawat C S. The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1979; 61(2): 173–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insall J N, Dorr L D, Scott R D, Scott W N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989; (248): 13–4.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D, Lawrence K, Petersen S, Paice C, Stradling J. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudi-nal studies? J Public Health Med 1997; 19 (2): 179–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res 1994; 3 (1): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jette A M. The Functional Status Index: reliability and va-lidity of a self-report functional disability measure. J Rheumatol 1987; 14 Suppl 15: 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jette A M, Davies A R, Cleary P D, Calkins D R, Ruben-stein L V, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Young R T, Brook R H, Delbanco T L. The Functional Status Questionnaire: re-liability and validity when used in primary care [pub-lished erratum appears in J Gen Intern Med 1986 Nov-Dec;1(6):427]. J Gen Intern Med 1986; 1(3): 143–9.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Kaufman E E. Preliminary results of Miller-Gal-ante uncemented total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1990; 13 (5): 511–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R M, Bush J W, Berry C C. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 1976; 11(4): 478–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz J N, Wright E A, Guadagnoli E, Liang M H, Karlson E W, Cleary P D. Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37 (5): 687–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazis L E, Anderson J J, Meenan R F. Effect sizes for inter-preting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27 (3 Suppl): S178–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnersley P, Peters T, Stott N. Measuring functional health status in primary care using the COOP-WONCA charts: acceptability, range of scores, construct validity, reliability and sensitivity to change. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44 (389): 545–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for as-sessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38 (1): 27–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knight J L, Atwater R D, Grothaus L. Clinical results of the modular porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total knee ar-throplasty with cement: a 5-year prospective study. Or-thopedics 1997; 20(11): 1025–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson K, Hovelius L, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L. Arthrod-esis after failed knee arthroplasty. A nationwide multi-center investigation of 91 cases. Clin Orthop 1984; (191): 202–11.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson 0, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976–1992. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65 (4): 375–86.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L. Survival of knee arthro-plasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8030 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1986; 68 (5): 795–803.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson K, Tjörnstrand B, Lidgren L. Survival of knee ar-throplasties for rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56 (5): 422–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konig A, Scheidler M, Rader C, Eulert J. The need for a dual rating system total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1997; (345): 161–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kreibich D N, Vaz M, Bourne R B, Rorabeck C H, Kim P, Hardie R, Kramer J, Kirkley A. What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop 1996; (331): 221–5.
   Google Scholar
• Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Wong C, Tugwell P, Leslie K, Bullas R. The effect of elective to-tal hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993; 75(11): 1619–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequesne M G, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P. Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Valida-tion- value in comparison with other assessment tests [published errata appear in Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1988;73:1 and Scand J Rheumatol 1988;17(3):following 241]. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987; 65 : 85–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lequesne M. Informational indices. Validation of criteria and tests. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1989; 80 : 17–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lequesne M G, Samson M. Indices of severity in osteoar-thritis for weight bearing joints. J Rheumatol Suppl 1991; 27 : 16–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lequesne M, Fannius J, Reginster J Y, Verdickt W, du Lau-rier M V. Floctafenin versus acetaminophen for pain control in patients with osteoarthritis in the lower limbs. Franco-Belgian Task Force. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997a; 64 (5): 327–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lequesne M G. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1997b; 24 (4): 779–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescoe-Long M, Long M J, Johnston D W. Quality of life improvement in patients with osteoarthritis: the poten-tial for office-based assessment. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9(3): 177–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Reduced failure rate in knee prosthetic surgery with improved implantation technique. Clin Orthop 1993; (287): 94–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lewold S, Olsson H, Gustafson P, Rydholm A, Lidgren L. Overall cancer incidence not increased after prosthetic knee replacement: 14,551 patients followed for 66,622 person-years. Int J Cancer 1996; 68 (1): 30–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lewold S, Robertsson 0, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (5): 469–74.
   Google Scholar
• Liang M H, Fossel A H, Larson M G. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990; 28 (7): 632–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang M H, Larson M G, Cullen K E, Schwartz J A. Com-parative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28 (5): 542–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman J R, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Kilgus D J, Thomas B J, Finerman GA. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specif-ic and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome. J Ar-throplasty 1997; 12 (6): 639–45.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmander L S, Dalen N, Englund G, Hämälainen M, Jensen E M, Karlsson K, Odensten M, Ryd L, Sernbo I, Suomalainen 0, Tegnander A. Intra-articular hyaluronan injections in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicen-tre trial. Hyaluronan Multicentre Trial Group. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55 (7): 424–31.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonagh R P, Cliff A M, Speakman M J, O'Boyle P J, Ewings P, Gudex C. The use of generic measures of health-related quality of life in the assessment of out-come from transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79 (3): 401–8.
   Google Scholar
• Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop 1973; 94: 242–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin D P, Engelberg R, Agel J, Snapp D, Swiontkowski M F. Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the Musculoskeletal Function Assess-ment instrument. J Orthop Res 1996; 14(2): 173–81.
   Google Scholar
• Martin D P. Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkow ski M F. Com-parison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western On-tario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997; 79 (9): 1323–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias S D, Fifer S K, Patrick D L. Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach. Qual Life Res 1994; 3 (6): 403–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware J E, Jr., Rogers W, Raczek A E, Lu J F. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992; 30 (5 Suppl): M5253–65.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware J E, Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health sur-vey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 1994a; 32 (6): 551–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware J E, Jr., Lu J F, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994b; 32 (1): 40–66.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: past accom-plishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127 (8 Pt 2): 743–50.
   Google Scholar
• Meenan R F, Kazis L E, Anthony J M, Wallin BA. The clinical and health status of patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34 (6): 761–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller A, Friedman B. Fascial Arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1952; 34–A: 55.
   Google Scholar
• Nafei A, Kristensen 0, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Hvid I, Jensen J. Total condylar arthroplasty for gonarthrosis. A prospective 10-year study of 138 primary cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64 (4): 421–7.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L T, Franzen H, Carlsson A S, önnerfält R. Early radiographic loosening impairs the function of a total hip replacement. The Nottingham Health Profile of 49 patients at five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994; 76 (2): 235–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally J C, Bernstein I H. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer R H. Process-based measures of quality: the need for detailed clinical data in large health care databases. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127 (8 Pt 2): 733–8.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick D L, Deyo R A. Generic and disease-specific mea-sures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989; 27 (3 Suppl): S217–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant P, McEwen J, Prescott K. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile to test the validity of census variables to proxy the need for health care. J Public Health Med 1996; 18 (3): 313–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard W E, Bobbitt R A, Bergner M, Martin D P, Gilson B S. The Sickness Impact Profile: reliability of a health status measure. Med Care 1976; 14 (2): 146–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries M D, Philbin E F, Groff G D, Sheesley K A, Richman J A, Lynch F, Jr. Improvement in cardiovascular fitness after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78(11): 1696–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen P, Aro S, Slätis P, Sintonen H, Paavolainen P. Health and quality of life before and after hip or knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (2): 169–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter MA, Albohm M J, Keating E M, Faris PM, Meding J B. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10(6): 737–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, Knutson K, Lewold S, Goodman S, Lidgren L. Knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 4,381 primary operations 1985–1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (6): 545–53.
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompart-mental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Or-thop Scand 1999a; 70 (2): 170–5.
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Regis-ter: a postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1999b; 70 (5): 467–72.
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, Dunbar M J, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. 25 years experience. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1999c; 58 (3): 133–8.
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Knee Ar-throplasty for Osteoarthrosis and Rheumatoid Arthritis 1986–1996. Scientific Exhibit 5E028, Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Anaheim 1999d.
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: Validity and Outcome. Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Robertsson 0, Dunbar M J, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Past in-cidence and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Swe-den: a report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Reg-ister regarding the effect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(4): 376–80.
   Google Scholar
• Roos E M, Klässbo M, Lohmander L S. WOMAC osteoar-thritis index: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1999; 53(9): 716–21
   Google Scholar
• Ryd L, Kärrholm J, Ahlvin P. Knee scoring systems in go-narthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score Assessment Group . Acta Or-thop Scand 1997; 68 (1): 41–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schroder H M, Kristensen P W, Petersen MB, Nielsen PT. Patient survival after total knee arthroplasty. 5-year data in 926 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (1): 35–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder-Boersch H, Scheller G, Fischer J, Jani L. Ad-vantages of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplas-ty. Two-year results of a prospective randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117 (1–2): 73–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shiers L G. Arthroplasty of the Knee. Preliminary report of new method. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1954; 36: 553–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in re-lation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthoplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(4): 354–9.
   Google Scholar
• Speed J S, Trout PC. Arthroplasty of the Knee. A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1949; 31–B: 53.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner D L, Norman G R. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmeier J, Westbrook P. Divine Harmony: The Life and Teachings of Pythagoras, Berkely Hill Books, Berkeley, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Liang M H, Phillips C, Katz J N. The Short Form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health sta-tus measure in patients undergoing elective total hip ar-throplasty. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8 (3): 174–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan M. Sickness impact profile: introduction of a Swedish version of health status indicators. Läkartidnin-gen 1985; 82 (20): 1861–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan M. Measuring quality of life. A new general and a new tumor specific formulary for evaluation and plan-ning. Läkartidningen 1994; 91(13): 1340–1.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Ahlmen M, Archenholtz B, Svensson G. Mea-suring health in rheumatic disorders by means of a Swedish version of the sickness impact profile. Results from a population study. Scand J Rheumatol 1986; 15 (2): 193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware J E, Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling as-sumptions, reliability and construct validity across gen-eral populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41(10): 1349–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Sturmer T, Gunther K P, Brenner H. Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoar-thritis of the hip and knee-a review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 1997; 16 (2): 185–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tew M, Waugh W. Estimating the survival time of knee re-placement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1982; 64 (5): 579–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson S P. Life of Lord Kelvin. Chelsea Publishing, Chelsea, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Walldius B. Arthroplasty of the knee using an endoprosthe-sis [classical article]. Clin Orthop 1996; (331): 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ware J, Jr., Kosinski M, Keller S D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34 (3): 220–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Jr., Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30 (6): 473–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund I, Dimenas E. The Swedish version of the Not-tingham Health Profile. A questionnaire for the measure-ment of health-related quality of life. Läkartidningen 1990; 87 (18): 1575–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund I, Romanus B. A comparison of quality of life be-fore and after arthroplasty in patients who had arthrosis of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991; 73 (5): 765–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund I, Romanus B, Hunt S M. Self-assessed disability in patients with arthrosis of the hip joint. Reliability of the Swedish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10(4): 159–63.
   Google Scholar
• Williams J I, Llewellyn Thomas H, Arshinoff R, Young N, Naylor C D. The burden of waiting for hip and knee re-placements in Ontario. Ontario Hip and Knee Replace-ment Project Team. J Eval Clin Pract 1997; 3 (1): 59–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe F, Hawley D J. Measurement of the quality of life in rheumatic disorders using the EuroQol. Br J Rheumatol 1997; 36 (7): 786–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright J G, Young N L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50 (3): 239–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar