1,040
Views
142
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation
A study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

, , &
Pages 514-524 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Amstutz H C, Lodwig R M, Schurman D J, Hodgson AG. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop 1975; 111: 124–30.
  • Astion D J, Saluan P, Stulberg B N, Rimnac C M, Li S. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: Failure of a metal-backed acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78: 755–66.
  • Bartel D L, Bicknell V L, Wright T M. The effect of con-formity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replace-ments. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68: 1041–51.
  • Bartz R L, Nobel P C, Kadakia N R, Tubs H S. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82: 1300–7.
  • Benson K, Hartz A J. A comparison of observational stud-ies and randomized controlled trials. NEJM 2000; 342: 1878–86.
  • Carlsson A S, Gentz C E Postoperative dislocation in the Charnley and Brunswik total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1977; 125: 177–82.
  • Daly P, Money B. Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992; 74:1334–43.
  • Eftekhar N S. Dislocation and stability. In: Total hip arthroplasty, St Louis, C V Mosby,1993: 1505–53.
  • Ekelund A, Ryden N, Nilsson 0 S. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 80 years of age and older. Clin Orthop 1992; 281: 101–6.
  • Fumes 0, Lie S A, Espehaug B, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B, Havelin, L. I. Hip disease and prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–99. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 83 (4): 579–86.
  • Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Munuera L. Dislocation in low-friction arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7 (2): 149–55.
  • Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. The Chunky versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: clinical evaluation of a ran-domised, prospective study of 2 different hip implants. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (4): 407–13.
  • Gregory R J, Gibson M J, Moran C G. Dislocation after pri-mary arthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the hip. Wide range of movement is a risk factor. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73(1): 11–2.
  • Harris W H. Hybrid total hip replacement: rationale and intermediate clinical results. Clin Orthop 1996; 333: 155–64.
  • Havelin L L, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Fumes 0, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(4): 337–53.
  • Hedlundh U, Fredin H. Patient characteristics in dislocations after primary total hip arthroplasty. 60 patients compared with a control group. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (3): 225–8.
  • Hedlundh U, Ahnfelt L, Fredin II. Incidence of dislocation after hip arthroplasty. Comparison of different registra-tion methods in 408 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63 (4): 403–6.
  • Hedlundh U, Hybbinette C H, Fredin II. Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10(5): 609–14.
  • Hedlundh U, Ahnfelt L, Hybbinette C H, Wallinder L, Week-strom J, Fredin II. Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996a; 333: 226–33.
  • Hedlundh U, Ahnfelt L, Hybbinette C II, Weckstrom J, Fredin II. Surgical experience related to dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996b; 78 (2): 206–9.
  • Johansson T, Jacobsson S A, Ivarsson I, Knutsson A, Walll-strom 0. Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71(6): 597–602.
  • Kahn M A, Brakenbury P II, Reynolds I S R. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1981; 63: 214–8.
  • Kelley S S, Lachiewicz P F, Hickman J M, Patemo S M. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Cim Orthop 1998; 355: 163–70.
  • Kesteris U, Robertsson 0, Wingstrand II, Onnerfalt R. Cumulative revision rate with the Scan Hip Classic 1 total hip prosthesis. 1,660 cases followed for 2–12 years (erra-tum appears in Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (3): 330). Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (2): 133–7.
  • Lindberg II, Carlsson A, Gentz C. Recurrent and non-recur-rent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1982; 53: 947–52.
  • Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Money B E Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72: 518–28.
  • Money B E Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23(2): 237–48.
  • Money B E Difficult complications after hip joint replace-ment. Clin Orthop 1997; 334: 179–87.
  • Newington D P, Bannister G C, Fordyce M. Primary total hip replacement in patients over 80 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72: 450–2.
  • Nilsson L T, Stromquist B, Thorngren K G. Secondary arthroplasty for complications of femoral neck fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71:777–81.
  • Oparaugo P C, Clarke I C, Malchau II, Herberts P. Cor-relation of wear debris-indueed osteolysis and revision with volumetric wear-rates of polyethylene. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(1): 22–8.
  • Paterno S A, Lachiewicz P F, Kelley S S. The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabu-lar component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1997; 79 (8): 1202–10.
  • Pocock S J, Elboume D R. Editorial: Randomized trials or observational studies? NEJM 2000; 342: 1907–9.
  • Ritter M A. Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976; 121: 121–4.
  • Roberts J A, Finkayson D F, Freeman PA. The long-term resultsof the Howse total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69: 545–61.
  • Robinson R P, Robinson II J, Salvali E A. Companson of transtrochanteric and posterior approaches for total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1990, 147: 143–9.
  • SPSS Inc., "SPSS Advanced Models 9.0," SPSS Inc, Chi-cago, 1999.
  • Turner R S. Postoperative total hip prosthetic femoral head dislocations. Incidence, etiologic factors, and manage-ment. Clin Orthop 1994; 301: 196–204.
  • Vaughn B K. Managing chronic dislocated total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 1993; 4(1): 16–24.
  • Weaver J K. Total hip replacement: a comparison between the transtrochanteric and posterior surgical approaches. Chin Orthop 1975; 112: 201–6.
  • Woo R Y G, Money B E Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64: 1295–1306.
  • Woolson S T, Rahimtoola Z 0. Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replace-ment. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (6): 662–8.
  • Wroblewsky B M. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a review of the past, present status, and prospects for the future. Clin Orthop 1986; 210: 37–42.
  • Wroblewsky B M, Siney P D, Fleming PA. Chunky low-frictional torque arthroplasty in patients under the age of 51 years. Follow-up to 33 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84 (4): 540–3.
  • Yuan L, Shih C. Luxation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119 (5-6): 263–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.