The Cone hip stem
A prospective study of 13 patients followed for 5 years with RSA

References

• Bourne R B, Rorabeck C H, Ghazal M E, Lee M H. Pain in the thigh following total hip replacement with a porous-coated anatomic prosthesis for osteoarthrosis. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76 (10): 1464–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson A S, Gentz C F, Stenport J. Fracture of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement according to Charthey. Acta Orthop Scand 1977; 48 (6): 650–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crowe J F, Math V J, Ranawat C S. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1979; 61(1): 15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickob M, Martini T. The cementless PM hip arthroplasty. Four-to-seven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78 (2): 195–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh C A, Bobyn J D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after pri-mary cementless hip arthroplasty. Chin Orthop 1988; 231: 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Glassman A H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(1): 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Munuera L. Low-friction arthroplasty in severe acetabular dysplasia. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (5): 459–69.
   Google Scholar
• Heekin R D, Callaghan J J, Hopkinson W J, Savory C G, Xenos J S. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthe-sis, inserted without cement. Results after five to seven years in a prospective study (published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75 (5): 791). J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75 (1): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hozack W J, Rothman R H, Booth R J, Balderston R A. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty. A comparative study of equivalent patient populations. Clin Orthop 1993; 299: 161–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Snorrason E Subsidence, tip, and hump micro-movements of noncoated ribbed femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop 1993; 287: 50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason E Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br )1994; 76 (6): 912–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, Malchau H, Nivbrant B, Thornier J. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 94–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto K, Hasegawa Y, Iwase T, Iwasada S, Kanamono T, Iwata H. Failed cementless total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis due to hip dysplasia. A minimum five-year follow-up study. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1998; 57 (3): 130–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendrick J B I, Noble P C, Tubs H. Distal stem design and the torsion stability of cementless femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 ( 4): 463–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y Y, Kim B J, Ko H S, Sung Y B, Kim S K, Shim J C. Total hip reconstruction in the anatomically distorted hip. Cemented versus hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117 (1-2): 8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67 (6): 541–4.
   Google Scholar
• Malchau H, Kärrholm J, Wang Y X, Herberts P. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and con-ventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (5): 418–24.
   Google Scholar
• Merle d'Aubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1954; 36-A: 451–75.
   Google Scholar
• Mjiliberg B. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. The importance of heat injury. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 221) 1986: 1–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagano H, Inoue H, Usui M, Mitani S, Satoh T. Long-term results of Chunky low-friction arthroplasty for coxar-throsis with congenital hip dysplasia. 15 year follow-up study. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1997; 56 (4): 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Onsten I, Sanzen L, Carlsson A, Besjakov J. Migration of uncemented, long-stem femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty. A 2–8 year clinical follow-up of 45 cases and radiostereometric analysis of 13 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (3): 220–4.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson M, Fulford P, Denham R. Loosening of the femoral component after total hip replacement. The thin black line and the sinking hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1986; 68 (3): 392–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk R K, Wehrli U. Reaction of the bone to a cement-free SL femur revision prosthesis. Histologic findings in an autopsy specimen 5 1/2 months after surgery. Orthopäde 1989; 18 (5): 454–62.
   Google Scholar
• Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 232) 1989: 1–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugano N, Noble P C, Kamaric E, Salama J K, Ochi T, Tubs H S. The morphology of the femur in developmen-tal dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80 (4): 711–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner H, Wagner M. Conical stem fixation for cementless hip prosthesis for primary hip prosthesis and revisions. In: Endoprosthesis (Ed. Morsher E). Springer Verlag, Berlin 1995: 258–67.
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg G. Studies on dysplasia acetabula congenital sublux-ation of the hip joint with special reference to complica-tions of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand (Suppl) 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Wroblewski B M. The mechanism of fracture of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement. hit Orthop 1979; 3 (2): 137–9.
   Google Scholar