References
- Alkire M J, Dabezies E J, Hastings P R. High vacuum as a method of reducing porosity of polymethylmethacrylate. Orthopedics 1987; 10: 1533–9.
- Askew M J, Kufel M F, Fleissner PR, Gradisar IA, Salstrom S J, Tan J S. Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechani-cal properties of antibiotic-impregnated PMMA bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1990; 24: 573–80.
- Bishop NE, Ferguson S, Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78: 349–56.
- Breusch S J, Berghof R, Schneider U, WeiB G, Simank HG, Lukoschek M, Ewerbeck V. Der Stand der Zementiertech-nik bei Hattotalendoprothesen in Deutschland. Z Orthop 1999; 137: 101–7.
- Charifley J. Acrylic cement in orthopaedic surgery. E&S Livingstone, Edinburgh and London 1970; 10–19: 23–35.
- Draenert K. Zur Praxis der Zementverankerung. In: Forsc-hung und Fortbildung in der Chirurgie des Bewegungsap-parates 2 (Ed. Draenert K). München: Art and Science: 1988: 9–40.
- Draenert K, Draenert Y, Garde U, Ulrich C. In: Manual of cementing technique. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 1999.
- Geiger M H, Keating E M, Ritter M A, Ginther J A, Faris P M, Meding J B. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement. Clin Orthop 2001; 382: 258–66.
- Hahn M, Engelbrecht E, Delling G. Eine quantitative Analyse zur Bestimmung der Porosit�t von vorkomprimiertem und unter Vakuum gemischtem Knochenzement. Chirurg 1990; 61: 512–7.
- James S P, Jasty M, Davies J, Piehler H. A fractographic investigation of PMMA bone cement focusing on the relationship between porosity reduction and increased fatigue life. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 26: 651–62.
- Jasty J, Maloney W J, Bragdon C R, O'Connor D O, Haire T, Harris W H. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73: 551–8.
- Jasty M, Jiranek W, Harris W H. Acrylic fragmentation in total hip replacements and its biological consequences. Clin Orth 1992; 285: 116–28.
- K�hn K-D. Up-to-date comparison of physical and chemical properties of commercial materials. In: Bone cements. Springer, Brlin Heidelberg New York 2000.
- Kurdy N M G, Hodgkinson J P, Haynes R. Acrylic bone cement: influence of mixer design and unmixed powder. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 813–9. Lewis G. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bonecement: mixing method and viscosity.
- Biomed Mater Eng 1999; 9 (4): 197–207.
- Lewis G. Relative roles of cement molecular weight and mixing method on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: Simplex P versus Osteopal. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53 (1): 119–30.
- Lewis G, Austin G E. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement. J Appl Biomat 1994; 5: 307–14.
- Lidgren U, Drar H, M�ller J. Strength of polymethylmethacrylate increased by vacuum mixing. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 536–41.
- Lidgren U, Bodelind B, M�ller J. Bone cement improved by vacuum mixing and chilling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 57:27–32.
- Linden U. Fatigue properties of bone cement. Comparison of mixing techniques. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 431–3.
- Ling R S M, Lee A J C. Porosity reduction is clinically irrelevant. Clin Orthop 1998; 355: 249–53.
- Malchau H, Herberts P, S�derman P, Od�n A. Prognosis of total hip replacement: Update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, March 15–19, Orlando, USA 2000.
- Maltry J A, Noble P C, Kamaric E, Tullos H S. Factors influencing pressurization of the femoral canal during cemented totalhip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10:
- -7. M�ller-Wille P, Lidgren L. Boiling of monomer during high vacuum mixing of bone cement does not increase cement porosity, 6th EORS Conference, Bergen, Norway 1996:50.
- M�ller-Wille P, Wang J S, Lidgren L. Integrated system for preparation of bone cement and effects on cement quality and environment. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 38: 135–42.
- Schreurs B W, Spierings P, Huiskes R, Slooff T. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59: 403–9.
- Smeds S, Goertzen D, Ivarsson I. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties. Clin Orthop 1997; 334: 326–34.
- Wang J S, Kjellson F. Bone cement porosity in vacuum mixing systems. In: Bone cement and cementing technique (Eds. Walenkamp G H I M, Murry D W). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 2001.
- Wang J S, Franzen H, Jonsson E, Lidgren L. Porosity of bone cement reduced by mixing and collecting under vacuum. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 143–6.
- Wang J S, Franzen H, Toksvig-Larsen S. A comparison of eight bone cement mixing systems. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 260) 1994; 65: 62.
- Wang J S, Toksvig-Larsen S, M�ller-Wille P, Franzen H. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity? J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 33: 115–9.
- Wilkinson J M, Eveleigh R, Hamer A J, Milne A, Miles A W, Stockley I. Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone cement: a comparison of syringe and bowl mixing systems. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 663–7.
- Wixson R L, Lautenschlager E P, Novak M A. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement. J Arthroplasty 1987; 2: 141–9.