Nasal Airflow in Health and Disease

References

• Kayser R. Die exacte messung der luftdurchgangigkeit der nase. Arch Laryngol Rhinol 1895; 3: 101–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wright JVV. A consideration of the vascular mecha-nism of the nasal mucous membrane and its relations to certain pathological processes. Am J Med Sci 1895; 109: 516–23.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham HH. A clinical study of the inferior tur-binate cavernous tissue; its divisions and their signifi-cance. Can Med Assoc J 1941; 44: 477–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cauna N. Blood and nerve supply of the nasal lining. In: Proctor DF, Andersen I, eds. The nose, upper airways physiology and the atmospheric environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 45–69.
   Google Scholar
• Haight JSJ, Cole P. Site and function of the nasal valve. Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dishoek HAE, Leiden MD. The part of the valve and the turbinates in total nasal resistance. Int Rhinol 1965; 3: 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bridger GP. Physiology of the nasal valve. Arch Oto-laryngol 1970; 92: 543–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole P. The respiratory role of the upper airways. A selective clinical and pathological review. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book, 1993: 164.
   Google Scholar
• Jones AS, Lancer JM. Does submucosal diathermy to the inferior turbinate reduce nasal resistance to airflow in the long term? J Laryngol Otol 1987; 101: 448–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschalussow MA. Innervation der gefasse der nasen-schleimhaut. Pflugers Arch 1913; 151: 523–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg H. Beitrage zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Schleimhaut der Luftwege. Z Hals-Nasen-u Ohrenheilk 1925; 12: 340–64.
   Google Scholar
• Undritz W. Uber Vasomotorische Reflexe der Nase. Z Hals-Nasen-u Ohrenheilk 1929; 25: 157–86.
   Google Scholar
• Blier Z. Physiology of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion. Am J Physiol 1930; 93: 398–406.
   Google Scholar
• Slome D. Physiology of nasal circulation. Lect Sci Basis Med 1955; 5: 451–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malcolmson KG. The vasomotor activities of the nasal mucous membrane. J Laryngol Otol 1959; 37: 73–98.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Wilson H. The autonomic innervation of the nasal blood vessels of the cat. J Physiol 1974; 238: 549–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Neurological and pharmacological consider-ations. In: Proctor DF, Andersen I, eds. The nose, upper airways physiology and the atmospheric envi-ronment. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982: 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Wilson H. The parasympathetic secretory nerves of the nose of the cat. J Physiol 1973; 230: 213–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal PN. Bilateral vidian neurectomy-Indica-tions and results. J Laryngol Otol 1977; 91: 235–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddman R, Alumets J, Densert 0, Hakanson R, Sundler F. Occurrence and distribution of vip nerves in the nasal mucosa and tracheobronchial wall. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1978; 86: 443–8.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Lee RL. The influence of the hypothalamus on the sympathetic innervation of the nasal vascula-ture of the cat. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1981; 91: 127–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Sympathetic control of nasal erectile tissue. Eur J Respir Dis 1983; 64: 150–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlstrom A, Fuxe K. The adrenergic innervation of the nasal mucosa of certain mammals. Acta Otolaryn-gol (Stockh) 1964; 59: 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Anggard A, Edwall L. The effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation on the tracer disappearance rate and local blood content in the nasal mucosa of the cat. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1974; 77: 131–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm L. Sympathetic influence on the nasal mucosa. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1977; 83: 20–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix JS, Stjarne P, Anggard A, Lundberg JM. Sympathetic vascular control of the pig nasal mucosa (III): co-release of noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y. Acta Physiol Scand 1989; 135: 17–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cauna N, Cauna D. The fine structure and innerva-tion of the cushion veins of the human nasal respira-tory mucosa. Anat Rec 1975; 181: 1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burnham HH. An anatomical investigation of blood vessels of the lateral nasal wall and their relation to turbinates and sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1935; 50: 569–93.
   Google Scholar
• Beickert P. Halbseitenrhythmus der vegetativen inner-vation. Arch Ohren-Nasen Kehlkopifheikonde 1951; 157: 404–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stoksted P, Thomsen K. Changes in the nasal cycle under stellate ganglion blockade. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1953; 109-Suppl: 176–81.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R. The domestic pig as an experimental animal for studies on the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1978; 85: 431–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles K, Eccles R. Nasal vasodilation induced by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve. Rhinology 1982; 20: 89–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wheatley JR, Amis TC, Engel LA. Nasal and oral airway pressure-flow relationships. J Appl Physiol 1991; 71: 2317–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher MJ. Rhinomanometry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83: 711–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole P, Roithmann R, Roth Y, Chapnik JS. Measure-ment of nasal patency. A manual for users of the Toronto systems and others interested in nasal pa-tency measurement. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106 Suppl 171: 1–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eccles R. Evaluation of the nasal airway and nasal challenge. In: Mackay IS, Bull TR, eds. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology. . Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997: 4/4/1–4/4/15.
   Google Scholar
• Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Elbrond 0, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal deviations, before and after septoplasty. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 1180–7.
   Google Scholar
• Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 275–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkinson A, Eccles R. Acoustic rhinometry. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 4: 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Morris S, Jawad M, Eccles R. Relationships between vital capacity, height and nasal airway resistance in asymptomatic volunteers. Rhinology 1992; 30: 259–64.
   Google Scholar
• Syaballo NC, Bundgaard A, Entholm P, Schmidt A, Widicombe JG. Measurement and regulation of nasal airflow resistance in man. Rhinology 1986; 24: 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Havas T, Gutierrez MC, Morton J, Rhodes L. Nasal airway resistance in patients with cystic fibrosis. Aust J Otolaryngol 1994; 1: 434–8:
   Google Scholar
• Cole P. Nasal airflow resistance. In: Mathew OP, Sant'Ambrogio, GNYMD, eds. Respiratory function of the upper airway. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988: 391–414.
   Google Scholar
• Vig PS, Zajac DJ. Age and gender effects on nasal respiratory function in normal subjects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993; 30: 279–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polgar G, Kong GP. The nasal resistance of newborn infants. J Pediatr 1965; 67: 557–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocks J, Godfrey S. Nasal resistance during infancy. Respir Physiol 1978; 34: 233–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones AS, Viani L, Phillips D, Charters P. The objec-tive assessment of nasal patency. Clin Otolaryngol 1991; 16: 206–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broms P. Rhinomanometry. III. Procedures and crite-ria for distinction between skeletal stenosis and mu-cosal swelling. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1982; 94: 361–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Reilly M, Eccles KSJ. Changes in the ampli-tude of the nasal cycle associated with symptoms of acute upper respiratory tract infection. Acta Otolaryn-gol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan P, Eccles R. Spontaneous changes of unilat-eral nasal airflow in man. A re-examination of the 'nasal cycle'. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 590–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan P, Eccles R. The normal range of unilateral nasal air-flow in healthy human volunteers. J Physiol Lond 1996; 491P: P53–4.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Jawad MSM, Eccles R. Changes in unilateral nasal airflow in patients with seasonal aller-gic rhinitis measured in and out of season. Auris Nasus Larynx 2000; 27: 141–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jawad SSM, Eccles R. Effect of pseudoephedrine on nasal airflow in patients with nasal congestion associ-ated with common cold. Rhinology 1998; 36: 73–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quine SM, Aitken PM, Eccles R. Effect of submu-cosal diathermy to the inferior turbinates on unilat-eral and total nasal airflow in patients with rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1999; 119: 911–5.
   Google Scholar
• Stoksted P. Rhinometric measurements for determi-nation of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1953; 109 (Suppl): 159–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kern EB. The human nasal cycle. Mayo Clin Proc 1977; 52: 28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. The central rhythm of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1978; 86: 464–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen H. Observations on the alternate erectility of the nasal mucous membrane. Lancet 1901; 1: 564.
   Google Scholar
• Heetderks DL. Observations on the reaction of nor-mal nasal mucous membrane. Am J Med Sci 1927; 174: 231–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert AN, Rosenwasser AM. Biological rhythmic-ity of nasal Aarway patency-a re-examination of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1987; 104: 180–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havas TE, Cole P, Gullane PJ, Kassel R, Kamino D. The nasal cycle after laryngectomy. Acta Otolar-yngol (Stockh) 1987; 103: 111–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher EW, Liu M, Lung VJ. The nasal cycle after deprivation of airflow: A study of laryngectomy pa-tients using acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 114: 443–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bhole MV, Karambelkar PV. Significance of nostrils in breathing. Yoga-Mimamsa 1968; 10: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan SM, Eccles R. Effect of inspiratory and ex-piratory airflow on congestion and decongestion in the nasal cycle. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1989; 33: 191–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bamford OS, Eccles R. The central reciprocal con-trol of nasal vasomotor oscillations. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 1982; 394: 139–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Lee RL. Nasal vasomotor oscillations in the cat associated with the respiratory rhythm. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1981; 92: 357–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geterud A, Rundcrantz H. The effect of a local decongestant in acute rhinitis as related to body posi-tion. Rhinology 1983; 21: 155–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Saito Y. Postural variations in nasal resistance and symptomatology in allergic rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1979; 88: 268–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M. Posture induced nasal obstruction in patients with allergic rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 1994; 19: 135–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dishoeck HAE. Nasenplethysmometrials Mittel zur Diagnose der Durchlassigkeit des Sinus sig-moideus und der Vena jugularis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1938; 26: 45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson B, Rundcrantz H. Posture and pressure within the internal jugular vein. Acta Otololaryngol (Stockh) 1969; 68: 271–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundcrantz H. Posture and congestion of nasal mu-cosa allergic rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1969; 58: 281–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cole P, Haight JSJ. Posture and the nasal cycle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95: 233–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao S, Potdar A. Nasal airflow with body in various positions. J Appl Physiol 1970; 28: 162–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AM, Eccles R. Reciprocal changes in nasal resistance to airflow caused by pressure applied to the axilla. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1985; 99: 154–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haight JSJ, Cole P. Unilateral nasal resistance and asymmetrical body pressure. J Otolaryngol 1986; 16 (15 Suppl): 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Takagi K, Kobayasi S. Skin pressure-vegetative reflex. Acta Med Biol 1955; 4: 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kuno Y. Human perspiration. 1956. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield Illinois p. 204–11.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson H, Seebohm P. Nasal airway response to exercise. J Allergy 1968; 41: 269–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dallimore NS, Eccles R. Changes in human nasal resistance associated with exercise, hyperventilation and rebreathing. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1977; 84: 416–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth RD, Cole P, Shephard RJ. Exercise and nasal patency. J Appl Physiol 1983; 860–865.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kabasawa Y, Ohki M, Watanabe I. Exercise-induced change of nasal resistance in asth-matic children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 772–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syaballo NC, Bundgaard A, Widdicombe JG. Effects of exercise on nasal airflow resistance in healthy sub-jects and in patients with asthma and rhinitis. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1985; 21: 507–13.
   Google Scholar
• Niinma V, Cole P, Mintz Z, Shepard RJ. The switching point from nasal to oronasal breathing. Respir Physiol 1980; 42: 61–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tatum AL. The effect of deficient and excessive pul-monary ventilation on nasal volume. Am J Physiol 1923; 65: 229–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Saito Y, Watanabe K. Changes of nasal airway resistance caused by breathing holding. I. Results in normal subjects. Japanese Journal of Otology (Tokyo) 1976; 89: 30–5.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey TV, Kern EB. Response of nasal airway resistance to hypercapnia and hypoxia in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88: 247–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babatola FDO, Eccles R. Nasal vasomotor responses in man to breath holding and hyperventilation recorded by means of intranasal balloons. Rhinology 1986; 24: 271–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCaffrey TV, Kern EB. Response of nasal airway resistance to hypercapnia and hypoxia in the dog. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1979; 87: 545–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavanne L. Secretion nasale et glandes endocrines. Ann Otolaryngol 1987; 5: 401–25.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes H, Goodell H, Wolf S, Wolff HG. The nose. An experimental study of reactions within the nose in human subjects during varying life experiences. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1950: 154.
   Google Scholar
• Ellegard E, Karlsson G. Nasal congestion during the menstrual cycle. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994; 19: 400–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegard E, Karlsson G. Nasal congestion during pregnancy. Clin Otolaryngol 1999; 24: 307–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negus V. The comparative anatomy and physiology of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone, 1958: 402.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Eccles KSJ. Sympathetic innervation of the nasal mucosa of the pig. Res Vet Sci 1981; 30: 349–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamford OS, Eccles R. The role of sympathetic efferent activity in the regulation of brain temp-erature. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 1983; 396: 138–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojsen-Moller F, Fahrenkrug J. Nasal swell bodies and cyclic changes in the air passages of the rat and rabbit nose. J Anat 1971; 110: 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Webber RL, Jeffcoat MK, Harman JT, Ruttimann UE. MR demonstration of the nasal cycle in the beagle dog. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 869–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reo NV, Barnett JKC, Neubecker TA, Alexander ME, Goecke CM. A nuclear-magnetic-resonance in-vestigation of the upper airways in ferrets. 1. Effects of histamine and methacholine. Magn Reson Med 1992; 27: 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar BKS. Light on Pranayama. Unwin Paper-backs: London, 1981: 296.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof M, Servit Z, Manas K. Activating effect of nasal air flow on epileptic electrographic abnormali-ties in the human EEG. Evidence for the reflex origin of the phenomenon. Physiol Bohemoslovaca 1981; 30: 73–7.
   Google Scholar
• Servit Z, Kristof M, Strejckova A. Activating effect of nasal and oral hyperventilation on epileptic electro-graphic phenomena: Reflex mechanisms of nasal origin. Epilepsia 1981; 22: 321–9.
   Google Scholar
• Werntz DA, Bickford RG, Shannahoff-Khalsa D. Selective hemispheric stimulation by unilateral forced nostril breathing. Human Neurobiol 1987; 6: 165–71.
   Google Scholar
• Werntz DA, Bickford RG, Bloom FE, Shannahoff-Khalsa DS. Alternating cerebral hemispheric activity and the lateralization of autonomic nervous function. Hum Neurobiol 1983; 2: 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Effects of menthol on nasal sensation of airflow. In: Green BG, ed. Chemical senses "irrita-tion". New York: Marcel Dekker, 1990: 275–95.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke RW, Jones AS. Nasal airflow sensation [Edito-rial]. Clin Otolaryngol 1995; 20: 97–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AS, Lancer JM, Shone G, Stevens JC. The effect of lignocaine on nasal resistance and nasal sensation of airflow. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1986; 101: 328–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AS, Crocher R, Wight RG, Lancer JM, Beck-ingham E. The effect of local anaesthesia of the nasal vestibule on nasal sensation of airflow and nasal resistance. Clin Otolaryngol 1987; 12: 461–4.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Jones AS. The effect of menthol on nasal resistance to air flow. J Laryngol Otol 1983; 97: 705–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Jawad MS, Morris S. The effects of oral administration of ( - )-menthol on nasal resistance to airflow and nasal sensation of airflow in subjects suffering from nasal congestion associated with the common cold. J Pharm Pharmacol 1990; 42: 652–4.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg C, Schafer K, Braun HA. The effect of menthol on discharge pattern of cold receptors. Pflugers Arch 1984; 400: R17.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer K, Braun HA, Isenberg C. Effect of menthol on cold receptor activity. J Gen Physiol 1986; 88: 757–76.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Menthol and related cooling compounds. J Pharm Pharmacol 1994; 46: 618–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Griffiths DH, Newton CG, Tolley NS. The effects of D and L isomers of menthol upon nasal sensation of airflow. J Laryngol Otol 1988; 102: 506–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson HR, Hems R, Rowsell DG, Spring DJ. New compounds with the menthol cooling effect. J Soc Cosmetic Chemists 1978; 29: 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Role of cold receptors and menthol in thirst, the drive to breathe and arousal. Appetite 2000; 34: 29–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Rhinitis as a mechanism of respiratory defense. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1995; 252: S2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse WW, Holgate ST, eds. Asthma and rhinitis. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1995: 1488.
   Google Scholar
• Busse WW. Rhinitis and asthma. In: Naclerio RM, Durham SR, Mygind N, eds. Rhinitis mechanisms and management. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999: 435–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bende M, Barrow I, Heptonstall J, et al. Changes in human nasal mucosa during experimental coronavirus common colds. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1989; 107: 262–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimek L, Eggers G. Olfactory dysfunction in allergic rhinitis is related to nasal eosinophilic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100: 158–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson KE, Bende M. Adrenoceptors in the con-trol of human nasal mucosal blood flow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93: 179–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. Nasal airflow and decongestants. In: Nacle-rio RM, Durham SR, Mygind N, eds. Rhinitis mecha-nisms and management. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999: 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• Graf P, Juto JE. Sustained use of xylometazoline nasal spray shortens the decongestive response and induces rebound swelling. Rhinology 1995; 33: 14–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris S, Eccles R, Jawad MSJ, Riker DK, Witek TJ. An evaluation of nasal response following different treatment regimes of oxymetazoline with reference to rebound congestion. Am J Rhinol 1997; 11: 109–15.
   Google Scholar
• Blue JA. Rhinitis medicamentosa. Ann Allerg 1968; 26: 425–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toohill RJ, Lehman RH, Grossman TW, Belson TP. Rhinitis medicamentosa. Laryngoscope 1981; 91: 1614–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan P, Eccles R. Physiological versus pharmaco-logical decongestion of the nose in healthy human subjects. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockh) 1998; 118: 110–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth PH. Mediators of nasal blockage in allergic rhinitis. Allergy 1997; 52: 12–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle WJ, Boehm S, Skoner DP. Physiological re-sponses to intranasal dose-response challenges with histamine,methacholine,bradykinin,andprostaglandin in adult volunteers with and without nasal allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 924–35.
   Google Scholar
• Vayonis AG, Seroky JT, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Fireman P. Intranasal histamine, methacholine, and bradykinin challenge in children with and without allergy. Am J Rhinol 1995; 9: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton D, Eiser N. Histamine receptors in the human nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994; 19: 45–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secher C, Kirkegaard J, Bprum P, et al. Significance of H1 and H2 receptors in the human nose: rationale for topical use of combined antihistamine prepara-tions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982; 70: 211–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R, Wilson H. A kallikrein-like substance in cat nasal secretion. Br J Pharmacol 1973; 49: 712–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, White M, et al. Pattern of nasal secretions during experimental influenza virus infection. Rhinology 1996; 34: 2–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proud D, Reynolds CJ, Lacapra S, et al. Nasal provo-cation with bradykinin induces symptoms of rhinitis and a sore throat. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 173: 613–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees GL, Eccles R. Sore throat following nasal and oropharyngeal bradykinin challenge. Acta Otolaryn-gol (Stockh) 1994; 114: 311–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongracic J, Naclerio R, Reynolds C, Proud D. A competitive kinin receptor antagonist (DArgO, Hyp3, DPhe7)-bradykinin, does not affect the response to nasal provocation with bradykinin. Br J Pharmacol 1991; 31: 287–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mygind N, Naclerio RM. In: Naclerio RM, Durham SR, Mygind N, eds. Rhinitis mechanisms and man-agement. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999: 221–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt BMW, Timmer W, Georgens AC, et al. The new topical steroid ciclesonide is effective in the treat-ment of allergic rhinitis. J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39: 1062–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AS, Willatt DJ, Durham LM. Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103: 909–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv E, Hadar T, Shvero J, Raveh E. Objective and subjective nasal airflow. Am J Otolaryngol 1997; 18: 29 — 32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles R. The relationship between subjective and objective measures of nasal function. Jpn J Rhinol 1998; 37: 61–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sipila J, Suonpaa J. A prospective study using rhi-nomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to de-termine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 254: 387–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey TV. Rhinomanometry and diagnosis of nasal obstruction. Fac Plast Surg 1990; 7: 266–73.
   Google Scholar