References
- Saunders JC, Dear SP, Schneider ME. The anatomical consequences of acoustic injury. A review and tutorial. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 833–60.
- Rask-Andersen H, Ekvall L, Scholtz A, Schrott-Fisher A. Structural/audiometric correlations in a human in-ner ear with noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res 2000; 141: 129–39.
- Syka J. Experimental models of sensorineural hearing loss-effects of noise and ototoxic drugs on hearing. Prog Sens Physiol 1989; 9: 97–170.
- Ulfendhal M, Khanna SM, Lofstrand P. Changes in mechanical tuning characteristics of the hearing organ following acoustic overstimulation. Eur J Neurosci 1993; 5: 713–23.
- Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emission from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–91.
- Prasher D, Sulkowski W. The role of otacoustic emis-sions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 1999; 12: 183–92.
- Chan E, Suneson A, Ulfendhal M. Acoustic trauma causes reversible stiffness changes in the auditory sen-sory cells. Neuroscience 1998; 83: 961–8.
- Warr WB, Guinan Jr. JJ. Efferent innervation of the organ of Corti: two separate systems. Brain Res 1979; 173: 152–5.
- Yamasoba T, Dolan DF, Miller JM. Acquired resis-tance to acoustic trauma by sound conditioning is primarily mediated by changes restricted to the coch-lea, not by systemic responses. Hear Res 1999; 127: 31–40.
- Brown MC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Single olivo-cochlear neurons in the guinea pig. II. Response plas-ticity due to noise conditioning J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 3088–97.
- Miyakita T, Hellström PA, Frimanson E, Axelsson A. Effect of low level acoustic stimulation on temporary threshold shift in young humans. Hear Res 1992; 60: 149–55.
- Attanasio G, Barbara M, Buongiorno G, et al. Protec-tive effect of the cochlear efferent system during noise exposure. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999; 28: 361–7.
- Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1989; 43: 251–62.
- Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Collet L. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechani-cal properties in human subjects: dependence on stimu-lus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–35.
- Miller JD. Effects of noise on people. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 729–64.
- Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105.
- Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Wagner W, Just K, Zenner HP. Monitoring noise susceptibility sensitivity of otoa-coustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Au-diol 1999; 33: 367–82.
- Vink BM, Van Cauwenberge PB, Leroy L, Corthals P. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology 1999; 38: 44–52.
- Withnell RH, Yates GK, Kirk DL. Changes to low-fre-quency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea. Hear Res 2000; 139: 1–12.
- Tognola G, Grandori F, Avan P, Ravazzani P, Bonfils P. Frequency-specific information from click evoked otoacoustic emissions in noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1999; 38: 243–50.
- Nordmann AS, Bohne BA, Harding GW. Histopatho-logical differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 2000; 139: 13–30.
- Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–67.
- Zennaro O, Erre P, Aran JM, Dauman R. Short term effectiveness of medial efferent does not predict suscep-tibility to temporary threshold shift in guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 1998; 118: 681–4.
- Yamasoba T, Dolan DF. Chronic strychnine adminis-tration into the cochlea potentiates permanent threshold shift following noise exposure. Hear Res 1997; 112: 13–20.
- Maison S, Liberman MC. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivococh-lear reflex strength. J Neurosci 2000; 15: 4701–7.