References
- Miller JD, Watson CS, Covell WP. Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1963; 176: 1–91.
- Canlon B, Borg E, Flock A. Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimu-lus. Hear Res 1988; 34: 197–200.
- Franklin DJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Stagner BB, Mar-tin GK. Altered susceptibility of 2f1-f2 acoustic-distor-tion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits. Hear Res 1991; 53: 185–208.
- Campo P, Subramaniam M, Henderson D. The effect of conditioning exposures on hearing loss from trau-matic exposure. Hear Res 1991; 55: 195–200.
- Henselman W, Henderson D, Subramaniam M, Sallus-tio V. The effect of conditioning exposures on hearing loss from impulse noise. Hear Res 1994; 78: 1–10.
- McFadden SL, Henderson D, Shen YH. Low-fre-quency conditioning provides long-term protection from noise-induced threshold shifts in chinchillas. Hear Res 1997; 103: 142–50.
- Pukkila M, Zhai S, Virkkala J, Pirvola U, Ylikoski J. The toughening phenomenon in rat's auditory organ. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1997; 529: 59–62.
- White DR, Boettcher FA, Miles LR, Gratton MA. Effectiveness of intermittent and continuous acoustic stimulation in preventing noise-induced hearing and hair cell loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1566–72.
- Brown DK, Bowman DM, Kimberley BP. The effects of maturation and stimulus parameters on the optimal f2/f1 ratio of the 2f1-12 distortion product otoacoustic emission in neonates. Hear Res 2000; 145: 17–24.
- Lenoir M, Puel JL. Development of 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emissions in the rat. Hear Res 1987; 29: 265–72.
- Brown AM. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear Res 1987; 31: 25–38.
- Pouyatos B, Campo P, Lataye R. Use of DPOAEs for assessing hearing loss caused by styrene in the rat. Hear Res 2002; 165: 156–64.
- Miman MC, Ozturan O, Iraz M, Erdem T, Olmez E. Amikacin ototoxicity enhanced by Ginkgo biloba ex-tract (EGb 761). Hear Res 2002; 169: 121–9.
- Yoshida N, Liberman MC. Heat stress and protection from acoustic injury in mice. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 10116–24.
- Wang Y, Liberman MC. Restraint stress and protec-tion from acoustic injury in mice. Hear Res 2002; 165: 96–102.
- Niu X, Canlon B. Protective mechanisms of sound conditioning. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 59: 96–105.
- Willott JF, Turner JG, Sundin VS. Effects of exposure to an augmented acoustic environment on auditory function in mice: roles of hearing loss and age during treatment. Hear Res 2000; 142: 79–88.
- Yoshida N, Liberman MC. Sound conditioning re-duces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice. Hear Res 2000; 148: 213–9.
- Subramaniam M, Henderson D, Spongr VP. Protec-tion from noise induced hearing loss: is prolonged conditioning necessary? Hear Res 1993; 65: 234–9.
- Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA. Susceptibility of the noise-toughened auditory system to noise-induced trauma. Hear Res 1999; 132: 140–8.
- Subramaniam M, Campo P, Henderson D. Develop-ment of resistance to hearing loss from high frequency noise. Hear Res 1991; 56: 65–8.
- Yamasoba T, Dolan DF, Miller JM. Acquired resis-tance to acoustic trauma by sound conditioning is primarily mediated by changes restricted to the cochlea not by systemic responses. Hear Res 1999; 127: 31–40.
- Ryan AF, Luo L, Ueber RL, Woolf NK, Axelsson GA. Role of the middle ear muscles in acoustic condi-tioning: physiological and molecular studies. In: Salvi A, Henderson D, Fiorino F, Colleti V, eds. Auditory system plasticity and regeneration. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme, 1996: 155–64.
- Yamasoba T, Dolan DF. The medial cochlear efferent system does not appear to contribute to the develop-ment of acquired resistance to acoustic trauma. Hear Res 1998; 120: 143–51.