References
- Quaranta A, Portalatini P, Henderson D. Temporary and permanent threshold shift: an overview. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 48: 75–86.
- Cody AR. Acoustic lesions of the mammalian cochlea: implications for the spatial distribution of the "active process". Hear Res 1992; 62: 166–72.
- Cody AR, Russell IJ. The response of the mammalian cochlea to acoustic overstimulation. In: Salvi RJ, Hen-derson D, Hamernik RP, Colletti V, eds. Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss. New York: Plenum, 1986: 49–161.
- Patuzzi R, Robertson D. Tuning in the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 1988; 68: 1009–82.
- Patuzzi R. Effects of noise on auditory nerve response. In: Dancer AL, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, Hamernik RP, eds. Noise induced hearing loss. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1992: 45–59.
- Hellström PA. The relationship between sound transfer functions and hearing levels. Hear Res 1995; 88: 54–60.
- Borg E. A quantitative study of the effect of the acoustic stapedius reflex on sound transmission through the middle ear of man. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1968; 66: 461–72.
- Warr WB, Guinan JJ Jr, White JS. Organization of efferent fibres. In: Altschuler RA, Hoffman DW, Bobbin RP, eds. Neurobiology of hearing: the cochlea. New York: Raven Press, 1986: 333–48.
- Rajan R. Cochlear outer-hair-cell efferents and complex-sound-induced hearing loss: protective and opposing effects. J Neurophysiol 2001; 86: 3073–6.
- Maison SF, Liberman CM. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivococh-lear reflex strength. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 4701–7.
- Collet L, Kemp D, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active coch-lear micromechanical properties of human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 42: 251–62.
- Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral auditory stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–35.
- Ward WD. Susceptibility to auditory fatigue. In: Neff WD, ed. Contributions to sensory physiology, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
- Hellström PA, Dengerink H. The relevance of A-weighted sound pressure levels when predicting the risk for NIHL. In: Henderson D, Prasher D, Kopke RD, Salvi RJ, Hamernik RP, eds. Noise induced hearing loss: basic mechanisms, prevention and control. London: NRN Publications. 2001: 341–50.
- Johnson DL. New auditory damage risk criteria and standard for impulse noise. In: Dancer AL, ed., RTO lecture series 219: damage risk from impulse noise. RTO-ENP-11, AC/323 (HFM) TP/31 Res and Tech Org (RTO) of NATO. Neully sur Seine CEDEX, France, 2000, 2–1–2–9.
- Savolainen S, Kuokkanen JT, Lehtomaki KM. Influence of strict regulations on the use of hearing protectors in the Finnish Defence forces. Mil Med 1999; 164: 824.
- Kringlebotn M. Frequency characteristics of sound transmission in middle ears from Norwegian cattle, and the effect of static pressure differences across the tym-panic membrane and the footplate. J Acoust Soc An 2000; 107: 1442–50
- Zwicker E. On a psychoacoustical equivalent of tuning curves. In: Zwicker E, Terhardt E, eds. Facts and models in hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974: 132–41.
- Rajan R. Centrifugal pathways protect hearing sensitiv-ity at the cochlea in noisy environments that exacerbate the damage induced by loud sounds. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 6684–93.
- Rajan R. Involvement of the cochlear efferent pathways in protective effects elicited with binaural loud sound exposure in cats. J Neurophysiol 1995; 74: 582–97.
- Rajan R. Frequency and loss dependence of the protec-tive effects of the olivocochlear pathways in cats. J Neurophysiol 1995; 74: 598–615.
- Kumar A, Barman A. Effects of efferent-induced changes on acoustical reflex. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 144–7.