References
- Bamford OS, Eccles R. The central reciprocal control of nasal vasomotor oscillations. Pflugers Arch Eur J Physiol 1982; 394: 139–43
- Eccles R. Nasal airflow in health and disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2000; 120: 580–95
- Littlejohn MC, Stiernberg CM, Hokanson JA, Quinn FB, Jr, Bailey BJ. The relationship between the nasal cycle and mucociliary clearance. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 117–20
- Eccles R, Reilly M, Eccles KS. Changes in the amplitude of the nasal cycle associated with symptoms of acute upper respiratory tract infection. Acta Otolaryngol 1996; 116: 77–81
- Bende M, Barrow I, Heptonstall J, Higgins PG, Al-Nakib W, Tyrrell DA, et al. Changes in human nasal mucosa during experimental coronavirus common colds. Acta Otolaryngol 1989; 107: 262–9
- Gosepath J, Amedee RG, Mann WJ. Nasal provocation testing as an international standard for evaluation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 512–16
- Becerril Angeles MH, Perez Lopez A, Azuara Pliego E. Nasal allergenic provocation test. Rev Alerg Mex 2000; 47: 166–8
- Sung YW, Rha KS, Park CI. The effect of alcohol on nasal cycle and nasal geometry. Korea J Otolaryngol 1996; 39: 965–9
- Corney JP, Kemker BJ, Nelson R, Gungor A. Evaluation of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry in normal and allergic subjects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117: 22–8
- Fisher EW, Scadding GK, Lund VJ. The role of acoustic rhinometry in studying the nasal cycle. Rhinology 1993; 31: 57–61
- Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometer: recommendations for technical specifications and standard operating procedures. Rhinology 2000; (Suppl 16): 3–17
- Fisher EW, Liu M, Lund VJ. The nasal cycle after deprivation of airflow: a study of laryngectomy patients using acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114: 443–6
- Hasegawa M, Kern EB. The human nasal cycle. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 52: 28–34
- Gotlib T, Samolinski B, Grzanka A. Bilateral nasal allergen provocation monitored with acoustic rhinometry. Assessment of both nasal passages and the side reacting with greater congestion: relation to the nasal cycle. Clin Exp Allergy 2005; 35: 313–18
- Ganslmayer M, Spertini F, Rahn F, Terrien MH, Mosimann B, Leimgruber A. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergen. Allergy 1999; 54: 974–9
- Kase Y, Hilberg O, Pedersen OF. Posture and nasal patency: evaluation by acoustic rhinometry. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114: 70–4
- Moinuddin R, Mamikoglu B, Barkatullah S, Corey JP. Detection of the nasal cycle. Am J Rhinol 2001; 15: 35–9
- Lane AP, Zweiman B, Lanza DC, Swift D, Doty R, Dhong HJ, et al. Acoustic rhinometry in the study of the acute nasal allergic response. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996; 105: 811–18