199
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparisons between Neural Response Imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII Bionic Ear users with HiResolution™ sound processing strategies

, , MD, , , , , & show all
Pages 732-735 | Received 24 Aug 2004, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Cervais J. The relationship between ECAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 15: 168–75
  • Di Nardo W, Ippolito S, Quaranta N, Cadoni G, Galli J. Correlation between NRT measurement and behavioural levels in patients with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2003; 23: 352–5
  • Gordon KA, Ebinger KA, Gilden JE, Shapiro WH. Neural response telemetry in 12- to 24-month-old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 42–8
  • Hodges AV, Butts S, Dolan-Ash S, Balkany TJ. Using electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds to fit the CLARION cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1999; 177: 64–8
  • Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, de Laat JA, Grote JJ. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 184–97

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.