References
- Kennedy DW. Multichannel intracochlear electrodes: mechanisms of insertion trauma. Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 42–9
- Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, Shapiro W, Knight M, Stecker M, et al. Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 28–40
- Eisen MD, Frank KH. Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions and HiResolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjects. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 528–38
- Seidman MD, Vivek P, Dickinson W. Neural response telemetry results with the nucleus 24 contour in a perimodiolar position. Otol Neurootol 2005; 26: 620–3
- van Weert S, Stokroos RJ, Rikers MJG, van Dijk P. Effect of perimodiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve response: a neural response telemetry study. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125: 725–31
- Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Reeder RM, Raulie JC. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 71–6
- Eisen MD, Franck KH. Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005; 6: 160–70
- Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 1538–47
- Hüttenbrink KB, Zahnert T, Jolly C, Hofmann G. Movements of cochlear implant electrodes inside the cochlea during insertion: an X-ray microscopy study. Otol Neurotol 2002; 23: 187–91
- Huang TC, Reitzen SD, Marrinam MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advanced electrode with the advanced off stylet technique. Otol Neurotol 2006; 27: 159–66
- Todt I, Basta D, Eisenschenk A, Seidl RO, Ernst A. The pull-back technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion. Otol Head Neck 2005; 132: 751–4
- Lai WK, Dillier N. A simple two-component model of electrically evoked compound action potential in the human cochlea. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5: 333–45
- Cohen LT, Xu J, Xu SA, Clark GM. Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 859–65
- Battmer RD, Sproegel I, Frohne Buechner C, Lenarz T. Intracochlear current spread in subjects with and without positioner. # G7 P23, 9th International Conference on Cochlear Implants, 14–17 June 2006, Vienna.
- Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT. An empirical model of electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear Res 1999; 135: 1–18
- Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Robinson BK, Nourski KV, Jeng FC. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials. Hear Res 2004; 198: 75–86
- Sheperd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1992; 66: 108–20
- Briare JJ, Frijns JHM. Unravelling the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear Res 2005; 205: 143–56