References
- Ching TYC, Incerti P, Hill M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 9–21
- Ching TYC, Wanrooy EV, Hill M, Incerti P. Performance in children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: bilateral stimulation and binaural hearing. Int J Audiol 2006; 45(Suppl 1)S108–S112
- Dunn C, Tyler RS. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005; 48: 668–80
- Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H. Beneficial effect of contralateral amplification in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int J 2003; 4: 52–4
- Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H. Binaural-bimodal hearing: concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125: 863–9
- Luntz M, Yehudai N, Shpak T. Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal-binaural hearing users (Unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid). Acta Otolaryngol 2007; 127: 1045–50
- Mok M. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49: 338–51
- Morera C, Manerique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, et al. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125: 596–606
- Chen JM, Shipp D, Al-Abidi A, Ng A, Lenarz T. Does choosing the “worse” ear for cochlear implantation affect outcome. Otol Neurotol 2001; 22: 335–9
- Battmer RD, Gupta SP, Allum-Mecklenburg DJ, Lenarz T. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 185–7
- Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 909–16
- Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, Niparko JK. Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 2005;26(Suppl) 7S–16S.
- Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted post-operative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 582–9
- Yao WN, Turner CW, Gantz BJ. Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49: 1085–90
- Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 714–31
- Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, Agrawal S, Parkinson A, Peters R, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 43–59
- Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M, Mawman D, Proops D, Craddock L, et al. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26: 988–98
- Van Hosel RJ, Tyler RS. Speech perception, localization and lateralization in bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 113: 1617–30
- Plyler PN, Fleck EL. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49: 616–27
- Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 1351–61