http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-1117
References
- Zhang LC, Zhang TY, Dai PD, et al. Titanium versus non-titanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty: a meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131:708–715.
- Celenk F, Baglam T, Baysal E, et al. Management of incus long process defects: incus interposition versus incudostapedial rebridging with bone cement. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:842–847.
- Emir H, Kizilkaya Kaptan Z, Göcmen H, et al. Ossiculoplasty with intact stapes: analysis of hearing results according to the middle ear risk index. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:1088–1094.
- O’Reilly RC, Cass SP, Hirsch BE, et al. Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26:853–858.
- Al-Qudah M, Dawes PJD. Malleus-stapes assembly: experience with two prostheses. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120:736–739.
- Romanet P, Duvillard C, Delouane M. Mastoid cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2000;117:105–109.
- Kartush JM. Ossicular chain reconstruction. Capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994;27:689–715.
- Goldenberg RA, Driver M. Long-term results with hydroxylapatite middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:635–642.
- Martin AD, Harner SG. Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:61–64.
- Alaani A, Raut VV. Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty–follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010;37:150–154.
- Baker AB, O'Connell BP, Nguyen SA, et al. Ossiculoplasty with titanium prostheses in patients with intact stapes: comparison of TORP versus PORP. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:1676–1682.
- Felek SA, Celik H, Islam A, et al. Type 2 ossiculoplasty: prognostic determination of hearing results by middle ear risk index. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31:325–331.
- Galy-Bernadoy C, Akkari M, Mathiolon C, et al. Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131:289–292.
- Mardassi A, Deveze A, Sanjuan M, et al. Titanium ossicular chain replacement prostheses: prognostic factors and preliminary functional results. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128:53–58.
- Meulemans J, Wuyts FL, Forton GE. Middle ear reconstruction using the titanium kurz variac partial ossicular replacement prosthesis: functional results. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139:1017–1025.
- Naragund AI, Mudhol RS, Harugop AS, et al. Ossiculoplasty with autologous incus versus titanium prosthesis: a comparison of anatomical and functional results. Indian J Otol. 2011;17:75–79.
- Neudert M, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, et al. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:332–338.
- Quérat C, Martin C, Prades JM, et al. Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131:211–216.
- Somers T, Van Rompaey V, Claes G, et al. Ossicular reconstruction: hydroxyapatite bone cement versus incus remodelling. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:1095–1101.
- Yazıcı H, Uzunkulaoğlu H, Emir HK, et al. Comparison of incus interpositioning technique versus glass ionomer cement application in type 2 tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:1593–1596.