2,878
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Bimodal benefit for cochlear implant listeners with different grades of hearing loss in the opposite ear

, &
Pages 713-721 | Received 11 Jan 2018, Accepted 18 Feb 2018, Published online: 19 Mar 2018

References

  • Dettman SJ, D'Costa WA, Dowell RC, et al. Cochlear implants for children with significant residual hearing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:612–618.
  • Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, et al. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear. 2010;31:186–194.
  • Hoppe U, Hast A, Hocke T. Audiometry-based screening procedure for cochlear implant candidacy. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:1001–1005.
  • Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, et al. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol. 1997;18:S140–S141.
  • Ching TYC, Psarros C, Hill M, et al. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear. 2001;22:365–380.
  • Ching TYC, Incerti P, Hill M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear. 2004;25:9–21.
  • Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, et al. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2005;125:596–606.
  • van Hoesel RJ. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2012;288:100–113.
  • Veugen LC, Chalupper J, Snik AF, et al. Matching automatic gain control across devices in bimodal cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2016;37:260–270.
  • Veugen LC, Chalupper J, Snik AF, et al. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136:775–781.
  • Devocht EMJ, George ELJ, Janssen AML, et al. Bimodal hearing aid retention after unilateral cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol. 2015;20:383–393.
  • Dorman MF, Loizou P, Wang S, et al. Bimodal cochlear implants: the role of acoustic signal level in determining speech perception benefit. Audiol Neurotol. 2014;19:234–238.
  • Luntz M, Yehudai N, Shpak T. Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal-binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid). Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127:1045–1050.
  • Morera C, Cavalle L, Manrique M, et al. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit. Acta Oto Laryngol. 2012;132:1084–1094.
  • Sheffield SW, Simha M, Jahn KN, et al. The effects of acoustic bandwidth on simulated bimodal benefit in children and adults with normal hearing. Ear Hear.2016;37:282–288.
  • Sanhueza I, Manrique R, Huarte A, et al. Bimodal stimulation with cochlear implant and hearing aid in cases of highly asymmetrical hearing loss. Int Adv Otol. 2016;12:16–22.
  • Illg A, Bojanowicz M, Lesinski-Schiedat A, et al. Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:e240–e244.
  • Zhang T, Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, et al. Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ear and bimodal benefit. Ear Hear. 2013;34:133–141.
  • Siburt HW, Holmes AE. Bimodal programming: a survey of current clinical practice. Am J Audiol. 2015;24:243–249.
  • Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;120:3988–3997.