Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Volume 138, 2018 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,887
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes

Dr. Hideaki MotekiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan;
, M.D., Ph.D.,
Dr. Shin-Ya NishioDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan;
, Ph.D.,
Dr. Maiko MiyagawaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan;
, M.D., Ph.D.,
Dr. Keita TsukadaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan;
, M.D., Ph.D.,
Prof. Yoshihiro NoguchiDepartment of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Otolaryngology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan
, M.D., Ph.D. &
Prof. Shin-Ichi UsamiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; ;Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan; Correspondence[email protected]
, M.D., Ph.D.
Pages 1080-1085 | Received 20 Jul 2018, Accepted 25 Jul 2018, Published online: 31 Jan 2019

References

  • von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiol Neurootol. 2011;16:1–30.
  • Usami S, Moteki H, Tsukada K, et al. Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134:717–727.
  • Causon A, Verschuur C, Newman TA. A retrospective analysis of the contribution of reported factors in cochlear implantation on hearing preservation outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:1137–1145.
  • Usami S, Moteki H, Suzuki N, et al. Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011;131:405–412.
  • Tamir S, Ferrary E, Borel S, et al. Hearing preservation after cochlear implantation using deeply inserted flex atraumatic electrode arrays. Audiol Neurotol. 2012;17:331–337.
  • Hochmair I, Hochmair E, Nopp P, et al. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2015;322:14–23.
  • Buchman CA, Dillon MT, King ER, et al. Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: a prospective randomized trial. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:1773–1779.
  • Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, et al. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013;133:3–13.
  • Trieger A, Schulze A, Schneider M, et al. In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:152–157.
  • Mick P, Amoodi H, Shipp D, et al. Hearing preservation with full insertion of the FLEXsoft electrode. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:e40–e44.
  • Cosetti MK, Friedmann DR, Zhu BZ, et al. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:516–521.
  • Van Abel KM, Dunn CC, Sladen DP, et al. Hearing preservation among patients undergoing cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:416–421.
  • Sweeney AD, Hunter JB, Carlson ML, et al. Durability of hearing preservation after cochlear implantation with conventional-length electrodes and scala tympani insertion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154:907–913.
  • Wanna GB, O'Connell BP, Francis DO, et al. Predictive factors for short- and long-term hearing preservation in cochlear implantation with conventional-length electrodes. Laryngoscope. 2017;128:482–489.
  • Anagiotos A, Hamdan N, Lang-Roth R, et al. Young age is a positive prognostic factor for residual hearing preservation in conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2014;36:1–33.
  • Santa Maria PL, Gluth MB, Yuan Y, et al. Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation: a meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:e256–e269.
  • Dalbert A, Huber A, Baumann N, et al. Hearing preservation after cochlear implantation may improve long-term word perception in the electric-only condition. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:1314–1319.
  • Moteki H, Nishio SY, Miyagawa M, et al. Long-term results of hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery in patients with residual low frequency hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137:516–521.
  • Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Usami S. A comprehensive study on the etiology of patients receiving cochlear implantation with special emphasis on genetic epidemiology. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:e126–e134.
  • Usami S, Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, et al. Patients with CDH23 mutations and the 1555A > G mitochondrial mutation are good candidates for electric acoustic stimulation (EAS). Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132:377–384.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.