References
- Cuda D, Murri A. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274:4141–4148.
- O'Connell BP, Hunter JB, Wanna GB. The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2016;1:169–174.
- Christov F, Munder P, Berg L, et al. ECAP analysis in cochlea implant patients as a function of patient’s age and electrode-design. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133:S1.
- Christov F, Munder P, Berg L, et al. A twelve months follow-up: influence of origin and duration of hearing-loss on Tnrts after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale). 2016;6:258.
- Telmesani LM, Said NM. Effect of cochlea implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:660–665.
- van de Heyning P, Arauz SL, Atlas M, et al. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:251–262.
- Kamakura T, Nadol JB, Jr. Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human. Hear Res. 2016;339:132–141.
- Wilk M, Hessler R, Mugridge K, et al. Impedance changes and fibrous tissue growth after cochlear implantation are correlated and can be reduced using a dexamethasone eluting electrode. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0147552.
- Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB, et al. Auditory-nerve responses to varied interphase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014;15:187–202.
- Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, et al. Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26:34–37.
- Mittmann P, Todt I, Ernst A, et al. Radiological and NRT-ratio-based estimation of slim straight cochlear implant electrode positions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017;126:73–78.
- Mittmann P, Todt I, Ernst A, et al. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:4251–4256.
- Somdas MA, Li PM, Whiten DM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of new bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea following cochlear implantation in the human. Audiol Neurotol. 2007;12:277–284.
- Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Pfingst BE. Assessing the relationship between the electrically evoked compound action potential and speech recognition abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear. 2018;39:344–358.
- Verberne J, Risi F, Campbell L, et al. The effect of scala tympani morphology on basilar membrane contact with a straight electrodearray: a human temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38:47–53.
- Müller A, Hocke T, Mir-Salim P. Intraoperative findings on ECAP-measurement: normal or special case?. Int J Audiol. 2015;54:257–264.
- Spivak L, Auerbach C, Vambutas A, et al. Electrical compound action potentials recorded with automated neural response telemetry: threshold changes as a function of time and electrode position. Ear Hear. 2010;32:1–13.
- Hamerschmidt R, Schuch LH, Rezende RK, et al. Neural response telemetry via cochleostomy or the round window approach in cochlea implantation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;78:71–75.
- Adunka OF, Dillon MT, Adunka MC, et al. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:613–618.
- Poley M, Overmyer E, Craun P, et al. Does pediatric cochlea implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:1404–1407.