542
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments: Baha-5 vs Ponto-plus

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 517-521 | Received 02 Jan 2019, Accepted 01 Mar 2019, Published online: 07 Apr 2019

References

  • Tjellström A, Håkansson B. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;28:53–72.
  • Kara A, Iseri M. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral sensorineural deafness. Turk Klinikleri J Ear Nose Throat-Special Top. 2015;8:63–66.
  • Mudry A, Tjellström A. Historical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aids. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:1–9.
  • Reinfeldt S, Håkansson B, Taghavi H. The bone conduction implant: clinical results of the first six patients. Int J Audiol. 2015;54:408–416.
  • Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, et al. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol. 2015;54:51–61.
  • Kompis M, Krebs M, Häusler R. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino™. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127:829–835.
  • Desmet JB, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, et al. Van de Heyning P, Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:598–603.
  • Hernvig LH, Olsen SØ. Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold: El efecto de aprendizaje al utilizar oraciones danesas Hagerman (Dantale II) para determinar el umbral de recepción del habla. Int J Audiol. 2005;44:509–512.
  • Cekic S, Sennaroglu G. The Turkish hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol. 2008;47:366–368.
  • Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology. 1979;18:43–52.
  • Polat Z, Bulut E, Atas A. Assessment of the speech intelligibility performance of post lingual cochlear implant users at different signal-to-noise ratios using the Turkish Matrix Test. Balkan Med J. 2016;33:532.
  • Olsen SØ, Glad H, Nielsen LH. Comparison of two bone anchored hearing instruments: BP100 and Ponto Pro. Int J Audiol. 2011;50:920–928.
  • Hill-Feltham P, Roberts SA, Gladdis R. Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomised comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128:119–127.
  • Flynn MC. Smart and small–innovative technologies behind the Cochlear™ Baha® 5 Sound Processor. Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB. 2015;629761.
  • Bosman AJ, Hol M, Snik AFM. Evaluating oticon medical ponto plus and ponto pro sound processor. Audiol Online. 2014;
  • Caruso A, Giannuzzi AL, Sozzi V, et al. Bone anchored hearing implants without skin thinning: the Gruppo Otologico surgical and audiological experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274:695–700.
  • Georgescu M, Marinescu A, Tonu A, et al. Implantable bone-conduction hearing aid Baha system. J Electr Eng Electron Control Comput Sci. 2016;2:53–60.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.