References
- Carrillo RJ, Yang NW, Abes GT. Probabilities of ossicular discontinuity in chronic suppurative otitis media using pure-tone audiometry. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(8):1034–1037.
- Zollner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955;69(10):637–652.
- Wullstein H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1956;66(8):1076–1093.
- Meulemans J, Wuyts FL, Forton GE. Middle ear reconstruction using the titanium kurz variac partial ossicular replacement prosthesis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(10):1017.
- Horvath T, Lukacs D, Horvath B, et al. Does the type of ossicular chain lesion affect outcomes in chronic suppurative otitis media without cholesteatoma? J Int Adv Otol. 2019. 15(1):28–33.
- Niklasson A, Gladine K, Ronnblom A, et al. An optimal partial ossicular prosthesis should connect both to the tympanic membrane and malleus: a temporal bone study using laser Doppler vibrometry. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(3):333–339.
- Bared A, Angeli SI. Malleus handle: determinant of success in ossiculoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31(4):235–240.
- Brackmann DE, Sheehy JL, Luxford WM. TORPs and PORPs in tympanoplasty: a review of 1042 operations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984;92(1):32–37.
- Kotzias SA, Seerig MM, Mello M, et al. Ossicular chain reconstruction in chronic otitis media: hearing results and analysis of prognostic factors. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(1):49–55.
- Blom EF, Gunning MN, Kleinrensink NJ, et al. Influence of ossicular chain damage on hearing after chronic otitis media and cholesteatoma surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(11):974–982.
- Castro Sousa A, Henriques V, Rodrigues J, et al. Ossiculoplasty in chronic otitis media: surgical results and prognostic factors of surgical success. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2017;68(3):131–137.
- Mardassi A, Deveze A, Sanjuan M, et al. Titanium ossicular chain replacement prostheses: prognostic factors and preliminary functional results. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128(2):53–58.
- Mutlu A, Topdag O, Topdag M, et al. A comparison study of partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis (PORP) placement under the malleus or tympanic membrane graft in the presence of the malleus. Int Adv Otol. 2017;13(2):200–203.
- Haberman RS, Salapatas AM. Hearing outcomes after ossicular reconstruction with removal of the malleus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(1):144–150.
- Shimizu Y, Goode RL. Effect of absence of malleus on ossiculoplasty in human temporal bones. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(2):301–306.
- Cai L, Stomackin G, Perez NM, et al. Recovery from tympanic membrane perforation: effects on membrane thickness, auditory thresholds, and middle ear transmission. Hear Res. 2019;384:107813.
- Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, et al. Ossiculoplasty with intact stapes and absent malleus: the silastic banding technique. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(5):846–852.
- Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, et al. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019;145(1):440–457.
- Bance M. Optimizing ossicular prosthesis design and placement. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;81:14–23.
- De Vos C, Gersdorff M, Gérard J-M. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(1):61–67.