https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-4169
References
- Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16(2):176–186.
- Kontorinis G, Lenarz T, Schwab B. Anatomic limitations in implantation of middle ear transducer and carina middle ear implants 1 2. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(11):2289–2293.
- Lee JM, Jeon JH, Moon IS, et al. Benefits of active middle ear implants over hearing aids in patients with sloping high tone hearing loss: comparison with hearing aids. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37(3):218–223.
- Formby C, Sherlock LP, Hawley ML, et al. Consideration of methodology and measures of loudness for prescriptive hearing aid fitting and auditory dynamic range expansion: a sound therapy-based intervention to expand the auditory dynamic range for loudness among persons with sensorineural hearing losses: case evidence showcasing treatment efficacy. Semin Hear. 2017;38(1):130–150.
- Luetje CM, Brackman D, Balkany TJ, et al. Phase III clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device: a prospective controlled multicenter study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126(2):97–107.
- Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M, et al. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(10):600–608.
- Luetje CM, Brown SA, Cullen RD. Vibrant Soundbridge implantable hearing device: critical review and single-surgeon short-and long-term results. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010;89(9):E9–E14.
- Monini S, Bianchi A, Talamonti R, et al. Patient satisfaction after auditory implant surgery: ten-year experience from a single implanting unit center. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(4):389–397.
- Ceylan A. İşitme Cihazı Kullananlarda, İşitme Cihazı Memnuniyet Anketi ‘APHAB’ın Klinik Uygunluğunun Değerlendirilmesi. Turkey: Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi; 2012.
- John MF, Bankaitis AU. Implantable middle ear amplifier. Ear and Temporal bone surgery. Minimising risks and complications.In: Wiet RJ, editor. Chapter 22. Germany: Thieme Publishers; 2010. p. 290–298.
- Schmuziger N, Schimmann F, Patscheke J, et al. Long-term assessment after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge device. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(2):183–188.
- Wang JT, Wang AY, Psarros C, et al. Rates of revision and device failure in cochlear implant surgery: a 30-year experience. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(10):2393–2399.
- Maier H, Hinze AL, Gerdes T, et al. Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(2):136–146.
- Barbara M, Volpini L, Covelli E, et al. Complications after round window vibroplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(6):1601–1605.,
- Klein K, Nardelli A, Stafinski T. A systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of the Vibrant Soundbridge. J Otol Rhinol. 2013;2(3):2.
- Grégoire A, Van Damme JP, Gilain C, et al. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(1):66–72.
- Kırkım G, Şerbetçioğlu MB, Mutlu B. Uluslararası İşitme Cihazları Değerlendirme Envanteri Türkçe Versiyonu Kullanılarak Hastalardaki İşitme Cihazı Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi. KBB ve BBC Dergisi. 2008;16(3):101–107.
- Edfeldt L, Strömbäck K, Grendin J, et al. Evaluation of cost-utility in middle ear implantation in the 'Nordic School': a multicenter study in Sweden and Norway. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(1):19–25.
- Gunduz B, Atas A, Bayazıt YA, et al. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132(12):1306–1310.
- Ihler F, Bewarder J, Blum J, et al. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(12):3161–3169.