3,048
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Audiology

The relationship between preoperative factors and the pattern of longitudinal improvement in speech perception following cochlear implantation

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 402-407 | Received 22 Feb 2023, Accepted 24 Mar 2023, Published online: 21 Apr 2023

References

  • Black J, Hickson L, Black B, et al. Prognostic indicators in paediatric cochlear implant surgery: a systematic literature review. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011;12(2):67–93.
  • Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36–47.
  • Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venail F, et al. Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739.
  • Li J, Ji F, Chen W, et al. Analysis of the performance of post-lingually deafened patients with nurotron® VenusTM cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014;134(6):609–614.
  • Miyagawa M, Nishio SY, Usami SI. A comprehensive study on the etiology of patients receiving cochlear implantation with special emphasis on genetic epidemiology. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(2):e126-134–e134.
  • Chatelin V, Kim EJ, Driscoll C, et al. Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(3):298–301.
  • Ahmad FI, Demason CE, Teagle HFB, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with postlingual hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(8):1852–1857.
  • Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DM, et al. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35(4):913–920.
  • Sladen DP, Gifford RH, Haynes D, et al. Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(10):2368–2374.
  • Krueger B, Joseph G, Rost U, et al. Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(4):509–512.
  • Ramakers GGJ, Smulders YE, van Zon A, et al. Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2017;17:10.
  • Pulsifer MB, Salorio CF, Niparko JK. Developmental, audiological, and speech perception functioning in children after cochlear implant surgery. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(6):552–558.
  • Dillon MT, Buss E, Adunka MC, et al. Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(3):279–283.
  • Nadol JB.Jr. Electron microscopic findings in presbycusic degeneration of the basal turn of the human cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979). 1979;87(6):818–836.
  • Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP. Central presbycusis. Laryngoscope. 1985;95(2):128–136.
  • Sandmann P, Dillier N, Eichele T, et al. Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 2):555–568.
  • Glick HA, Sharma A. Cortical neuroplasticity and cognitive function in early-stage, mild-moderate hearing loss: evidence of neurocognitive benefit from hearing aid use. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:93.
  • Sharma A, Glick H. Cross-modal re-organization in clinical populations with hearing loss. Brain Sci. 2016;6(1):4.