References
- Piquet JJ, Desaulty A, Decroix G. Crico-hyoido-épiglotto-pexie. Technique opératoire et résultats fonc-tionnels. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1974; 91: 681–9.
- Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Menard M, Brasnu D. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohy-oidoepiglottopexy: a partial laryngeal procedure for glottic carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 421–6.
- Laccourreye 0, Weinstein GS, Brasnu D, Bassot V, Cauchois R, Jouffre V, et al. A clinical trial of contin-uous Cisplatin—Fluorouracil induction chemotherapy and supracricoid partial laryngectomy for glottic car-cinoma classified as T2. Cancer 1994; 74: 2781–90.
- Chevalier D, Laccoureye O, Brasnu D, Laccourreye H, Piquet JJ. Cricohyoidoepiglotopexy for glottic car-cinoma with fixation or impaired motion of the true vocal cord: 5-year oncologic results with 112 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 364–9.
- Laccourreye 0, Muscatello L, Laccourreye L, Naudo Ph, Brasnu D, Weinstein GS. Supracricoid partial la-ryngectomy with cricohyoido-epiglottopexy for "early" glottic carcinoma classified as T1—T2NO invading the anterior commissure. Am J Otolaryngol 1997; 18: 1–7.
- Crevier-Buchman L, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Gar-cia D, Jouffre V, Brasnu D. Evolution of speech and voice following supracricoid partial laryngectomy. J Laryngol Otol 1995; 109: 410–3.
- Laccourreye O, Crevier-Buchman L, Weinstein G, Bia-cabe B, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Duration and fre-quency characteristics of speech and voice following supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 516–21.
- Baken RJ. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Ed: Pro-ed, Austin, Texas. 1987.
- Wolfe V, Cornell R, Palmer C. Acoustic correlates of voice types. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 509–16.
- Rabinov RC, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Bielamowicz S. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of rough-ness and acoustic measures of jitter. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 26–32.
- Hammarberg B, Fritzell B, Gauffin J, Sundberg J, Wedin L. Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnor-mal voice qualities. Acta Otolaryngol 1980; 90: 441–51.
- Union Internationale Contre le Cancer. T.N.M. Stag-ing classification system. Ed.: Springer-Verlag, Paris. 1987. (4th edition).
- Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981.
- Rydell R, Schalen L, Fex S, Elner A. Voice evaluation before and after Laser excision vs. radiotherapy of TlA glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115: 560–5.
- Dejonckere P, Remade M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B. Differentiated per-ceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reli-ability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1996; 117: 219–24.
- Schoentgen J. Jitter in sustained vowels and isolated sentences produced by dysphonic speakers. Speech Com 1989; 8: 61–79.
- De Krom G. Consistency and reliability of voice qual-ity ratings for different types of speech fragments. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37: 985–1000.
- Karnell MP, Scherer RS, Fischer LB. Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three in-dependent voice laboratories. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 781–90.
- Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Dauer MS, Berke GS. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 126–34.
- De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test—retest study of GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 1997; 11: 74–80.
- Takahashi H, Koike Y. Some perceptual dimensions and acoustical correlates of pathological voices. Acta Oto-Laryngol 1975; Suppl 338.
- Hirano M, Hibi S, Yoshida T, Hirade Y, Kasuya H, Kikuchi Y. Acoustic analysis of pathological voice. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1988; 105: 432–8.
- Wolfe V, Ratusnik D. Acoustic and perceptual mea-surements of roughness influencing judgements of pitch. J Speech Hear Dis 1988; 53: 15–22.
- Smith BE, Weinberg B, Feth LL, Horii Y. Vocal roughness and jitter characteristics of vowels produced by esophageal speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 240–9.