Review of the Roles of Temporal and Place Coding of Frequency in Speech Discrimination

References

• Weyer EG. Theory of hearing. New York: John Wiley, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Evans EF. Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: some physiological pros and cons. Audiology 1978; 17: 369–420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordmark JO. Frequency and periodicity analysis. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP, editors. Handbook of perception. Vol. IV. New York: Academic Press, 1978: 244–82.
   Google Scholar
• von Bekesy G. Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone BM, Boyle AJF. Basilar membrane vibra-tion examined with the Mossbauer technique. Science 1967; 158: 389–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode WS. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 1218–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna SM, Leonard DGB. Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. Science 1982; 215: 305–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellick PM, Patuzzi R, Johnstone BM. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 131–41.
   Google Scholar
• Katsuki Y, Sumi T, Uchiyama H, Watanabe T. Elec-tric responses of auditory neurons in cat to sound stimulation. J Neurophysiol 1958; 21: 569–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuki Y, Suga M, Karmo Y. Neural mechanisms of the peripheral and central auditory system in monkeys. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1396–410.
   Google Scholar
• Kiang NYS, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF. Discharge patterns of single fibres in the cat's auditory nerve. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Evans EF. The frequency response and other properties of single fibres in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve. J Physiol 1972; 226: 263–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose JE, Galambos R, Hughes JR. Microelectrode studies of the cochlear nuclei in the cat. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital 1959; 104: 211–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aitkin L. The auditory cortex. London: Chapman and Hall, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Honrubia V, Ward PH. Longitudinal distribution of cochlear microphonics inside the cochlear duct (guinea pig). J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 44: 951–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone BM, Patuzzi R, Yates GK. Basilar mem-brane measurements and the travelling wave. Hear Res 1986; 22: 147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Moller AR. Use of pseudorandom noise in studies of frequency selectivity: the periphery of the auditory system. Biol Cybern 1983; 47: 95–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller AR. Frequency selectivity of single auditory nerve fibres in response to broadband noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 62: 135–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller AR. Frequency selectivity of phase-locking of complex sounds in the auditory nerve of the rat. Hear Res 1983; 11: 267–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans EF. Frequency selectivity at high signal levels of single units in cochlear nucleus. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP, eds. Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. New York: Academic Press, 1977: 185–92.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RV, Evans EF. Reverse correlation study of cochlear filtering in normal and pathological guinea-pig ears. Hear Res 1982; 6: 303–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer E. Correlation studies applied to the frequency resolution of the cochlea. J Aud Res 1967; 7: 209–17.
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont JJ, Johannesma PIM, Aertsen AMH. Re-verse-correlation methods in auditory research. Q Rev Biophys 1983; 16: 341–414.
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont JJ. Wiener and Volterra analyses applied to the auditory system. Hear Res 1993; 66: 177–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis ER, Henry KR. Dynamic changes in tuning in the gerbil cochlea. Hear Res 1994; 79: 183–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwislocki JJ. What is the cochlear place code for pitch? Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 256–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens SS. The relation of pitch to intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1935; 6: 150–4.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M, Zwislocki JJ. Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. I. The place code for pitch. Hear Res 1997; 111: 65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller AR. Unit responses in the cochlear nucleus of the rat to pure tones. Acta Physiol Scand 1969; 75: 530–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller AR, Jho HD. Late components in the com-pound action potentials (CAP) recorded from the in-tracranial portion of the human eighth nerve. Hear Res 1990; 45: 75–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller AR, Jho HD. Effect of high-frequency hearing loss on compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the human eighth nerve. Hear Res 1991; 55: 9–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller AR, Jho HD. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity. Audiology 1991; 30: 142–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwicker E, Lumer G. Evaluating traveling wave char-acteristics in man by an active nonlinear cochlear pre-processing model. In: Allen JL, Hall A, Hubbard ST, Neely A, eds. Peripheral auditory mechanisms. Berlin: Springer, 1985: 250–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fukazawa T, Tanaka Y. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission in an active feed-forward model of the coch-lea. Hear Res 1996; 95: 135–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller AR. Late waves in the response recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in hu-mans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993; 102: 945–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose JE, Brugge JF, Anderson DJ, Hind JE. Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single audi-tory nerve fibres of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 1967; 30: 769–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose JE, Hind JE, Anderson DJ, Brugge JF. Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory fibres in the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 1971; 34: 685–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller AR. Unit responses in the rat cochlear nucleus to repetitive transient sounds. Acta Physiol Scand 1969; 75: 542–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoendlin H, Schrott A. Analysis of the human audi-tory nerve. Hear Res 1989; 43: 25–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller AR. Evoked potentials in intraoperative moni-toring. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh TE, Goodman A. Speech discrimination in cen-tral auditory lesions. Laryngoscope 1957; 65: 987–1010.
   Google Scholar
• Moller MB, Moller AR. Loss of auditory function in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: re-sults in 143 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 1985; 63: 17–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf B, Magnan J, Chays A. On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies. Hear Res 1997; 103: 101–22.
   Google Scholar
• Young ED, Sachs MB. Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory nerve fibres. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 1381–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs MB, Young ED. Encoding of steady-state vow-els in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 470–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller RL, Calhoun BM, Young ED. Discriminability of vowel representations in cat auditory-nerve fibres after acoustic trauma. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 311–25.
   Google Scholar