‘Ooh, eh eh … Just One Small Cap is Enough!’ Servants, Detergents, and their Prosthetic Significance

References

• Ally, S. 2009. From Servants to Workers: South African Domestic Workers and the Democratic State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ally, S. 2011. ‘Domestics, “Dirty Work,” and the Affects of Domination’. South African Review of Sociology 42(2):1–7. doi: 10.1080/21528586.2011.582738
   Google Scholar
• Ashenburg, K. 2008. The Dirt on Clean: An Unsanitized History. Toronto: Vintage Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, K.E. 1986. ‘Origins of the Amawasha: the Zulu washermen's Guild in Natal, 1850–1910’. The Journal of African History 27(1):41–57. doi: 10.1017/S0021853700029194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1972 [1957]. ‘Soap-powders and Detergents’, in R. Barthes, Mythologies (trans. Annette Lavers). London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Beecher, C. 1842. A Treatise on Domestic Economy, for the Use of Young Ladies at Home, and At School. Boston: T. H. Webb.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, T. 1996. Lifebuoy Men, Lux Women: Commodification, Consumption, and Cleanliness in Modern Zimbabwe. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campkin, B. and Cox, R. 2007. Dirt: New Geographies of Cleanliness and Contamination. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Cieraad, I. 2006. At Home: An Anthropology of Domestic Space. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cock, J. 1980. Maids and Madams: A Study in the Politics of Exploitation. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comaroff, J. 1996. ‘The Empire's Old Clothes: Fashioning the Colonial subject’, in D. Howes (ed), Cross-Cultural Consumption: Global Markets, Local Realities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connellan, K. 2007. ‘White Skins, White Surfaces: The Politics of Domesticity in South African Homes From 1920–1950’, in D.W. Riggs (ed), Taking up the Challenge: Critical Race and Whiteness Studies in a Postcolonising Nation. Belair: Crawford House.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R.S. 1976. ‘The “Industrial Revolution” in the Home: Household Technology and Social Change in the 20th Century’. Technology and Culture 17(1):1–23. doi: 10.2307/3103251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R.S. 1983. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Debord, G. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle (trans. D. Nicholson-Smith). New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Delap, L. 2011. Knowing their Place: Domestic Service in Twentieth-Century Britain. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudden, F.E. 1983. Serving Women: Household Service in Nineteenth Century America. Middleton: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. 1978. The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners Vol 1. New York: Urizen.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, N. 2011. ‘Grace and The Townships Housewife: Excavating Black South African women's magazines from the 1960s’. Agenda 25(4):59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, J.N. 2006. Domestic Democracy: At Home in the New South Africa. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaitskell, D., Kimble, J., Maconachie, M., and Unterhalter, E. 1983. ‘Class, Race and Gender: Domestic Workers in South Africa’. Review of African Political Economy 10(27–28):86–108. doi: 10.1080/03056248308703548
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Femininism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D.D. 2002. Advertising to the American Woman 1900–1999. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, P. 1975. The Rise and Fall of the Victorian Servant. New York: The History Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S.S. 1999. ‘The Prosthetic Imagination: Enabling and Disabling the Prosthetic Trope’. Science, Technology & Human Values 24(1):31–54. doi: 10.1177/016224399902400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. 2009. ‘“The Girl About Town”: Discussions of Modernity and Female youth in Drum Magazine, 1951–70’. Social Dynamics 35(1):36–50. doi: 10.1080/02533950802666899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman, D. 1978. Seven Days a Week: Women and Domestic Service in Industrializing America. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, B. 2008. ‘Servicing Modernity: White Women Shop Workers on the Rand and Changing Gendered Respectabilities, 1940s–1970s’. African Studies 67(3):365–96. doi: 10.1080/00020180802505012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern-Foxworth, M. 1994. Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben, and Rastus: Blacks in Advertising, Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, S. 2001. ‘Presence and Prosthesis: A response to Nelson and Wright’. Cultural Anthropology 16(3):374–87. doi: 10.1525/can.2001.16.3.374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laermans, R. and Muelders, C. 2006. ‘The Domestication of Laundering’, in I. Cieraad, At Home: An Anthropology of Domestic Space. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manring, M.M. 1999. Slave in a Box: The Strange Career of Aunt Jemima. Charlottsville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, J. 2008. Lord Leverhulme’s Ghosts: Colonial Exploitation in the Congo. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Marie-Botha, F. 2006. ‘The influence of the Rural Survivalist Culture on Corporate Image’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, L. 2003. Save Women’s Lives: History of Washing Machines. Eaton: Oldewash.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, A. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, A. 2002. ‘Soft-soaping Empire: Commodity Racism and Imperial Advertising’, in N. Mirzoeff, The Visual Culture Reader (Second Edition). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meintjes, H. 2001. ‘“Washing Machines Make Lazy Women”: Domestic Appliances and the Negotiation of Women's Propriety in Soweto’. Journal of Material Culture 6(3):345–63. doi: 10.1177/135918350100600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, E. 1967. Detergents: A Unilever Educational Booklet (Revised Ordinary Series 1). Ipswich: W.S. Cowell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J-A. 1995. ‘Mammy the Huckster: Selling the Old South for the New Century’. American Art 9(1):86–109. doi: 10.1086/424235
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D.M. 2001. ‘Stumped Identities: Body Image, Body Politic, and the mujer maya as Prosthetic’. Cultural Anthropology 16(3):341–53.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, P. 1991. Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States, 1920–1945. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posel, D. 2010.‘Races to Consume: Revisiting South Africa's History of Race, Consumption, and the Struggle for Freedom’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33(2):157–75. doi: 10.1080/01419870903428505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, T. 1990. The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, B. 1993. The Servant’s Hand: English Fiction from Below. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. 1999. Dead Hands: Fictions of Agency, Renaissance to Modern. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shindler, J. 1980. ‘The Effects of Influx Control and Labour-Saving appliances on Domestic Service’. South African Labour Bulletin 6(1):22–6.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. 1996. ‘Madam and Eve: A Caricature of Black Women's Subjectivity’. Agenda 12(31):33–9. doi: 10.2307/4066261
   Google Scholar
• Snell, F.D. and Reich, I. 1951. ‘Detergents from Petroleum – Production and Properties’. Third World Petroleum Congress Proceedings (Section V). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, C. 2003. ‘Servants and Their Relationship to the Unconscious’. Journal of British Studies 42(3):316–50. doi: 10.1086/374293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedman, C. 2009. Labours Lost. Domestic Service and the Making of Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. 2002. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, S. 2000. Never Done: A History of American Housework. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D. 1981. Americans and Their Servants from 1820–1920. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swaisland, C. 1993. Servants and Gentlewomen to the Golden Land: The Emigration of Single Women from Britain to Southern Africa, 1820–1939. Durban: University of Natal Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, H.B. (ed). 1954. Journal of Jan van Riebeeck Volumes II, III, 1656–1662. H.B. Thom (ed) and J. Smuts (trans.). Cape Town: A.A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L.M. 2006. ‘The Modern Girl and Racial Respectability in 1930s South Africa’. The Journal of African History 47(3):461–90. doi: 10.1017/S0021853706002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigarello, G. 2008. Concepts of Cleanliness: Changing Attitudes in France since the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Onselen, C. 1982a. ‘AmaWasha: the Zulu Washermen's Guild of the Witwatersrand, 1890–1914’, in New Babylon, New Nineveh: Everyday Life on the Witwatersrand, 1886–1914. Johannesburg and Cape Town: Jonathan Ball.
   Google Scholar
• Van Onselen, C. 1982b. ‘The Witches of Suburbia: Domestic Service on the Witwatersrand, 1890–1914’, in New Babylon, New Nineveh.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace-Stevens, K. 2008. Mammy: A Century of Race, Gender, and Southern Memory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, M. 1991. ‘Prosthetic Theory: the Disciplining of Architecture’. Assemblage 15:6–29. doi: 10.2307/3171122
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M.W. 2001. ‘Desire and the Prosthetics of Supervision: A Case of Maquiladora Flexibility’. Cultural Anthropology 16(3):354–73. doi: 10.1525/can.2001.16.3.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zola, E. 1972 [1877]. L'Assommoir (trans. David Baguley). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar