507
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLE

Developing Standardized Methods for Sampling Freshwater Fishes with Multiple Gears: Effects of Sampling Order versus Sampling Method

Pages 353-362 | Received 11 Jul 2013, Accepted 22 Oct 2013, Published online: 20 Feb 2014

REFERENCES

  • Allen, D.M., S.K. Service, and M.V. Ogburn-Matthews. 1992. Factors influencing the collection efficiency of estuarine fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:234–244.
  • Backiel, T., and R.L. Welcomme. 1980. Guidelines for sampling fish in inland waters. EIFAC (European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission) Technical Paper 33:176.
  • Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841-B-99-002, Washington, D.C.
  • Bayley, P.B., and R.A. Herendeen. 2000. The efficiency of a seine net. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:901–923.
  • Bonar, S.A., and W.A. Hubert. 2002. Standard sampling of inland fish: benefits, challenges and a call for action. Fisheries 27(3):10–16.
  • Bonar, S.A., W.A. Hubert, and D.W. Willis. 2009. Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Carline, R.F. 2001. Effects of high frequency pulsed DC electrofishing on a wild Brown Trout population. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:571–579.
  • COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada). 2011. Species at risk public registry. COSEWIC, Ottawa. Available: http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca./ (January 2014).
  • Dauble, D.D., and R.H. Gray. 1980. Comparison of a small seine and a backpack electroshocker to evaluate nearshore fish populations in rivers. Progressive Fish-Culturist 42:93–95.
  • Dolan, C.R., and L.E. Miranda. 2004. Injury and mortality of warmwater fishes immobilized by electrofishing. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:118–127.
  • Dolédec, S., and B. Stazner. 2010. Responses of freshwater biota to human disturbances: contribution of J-NABS to developments in ecological integrity assessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:286–311.
  • Dwyer, W.P., B.B. Shepard, and R.G. White. 2001. Effect of backpack electroshock on Westslope Cutthroat Trout injury and growth 110 and 250 days posttreatment. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:646–650.
  • Ensign, W.E., A.J. Temple, and R.J. Neves. 2002. Effects of fright bias on sampling efficiency of stream fish assemblages. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17:127–139.
  • Fausch, K.D., J.R. Karr, and P.R. Yant. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:39–55.
  • Hendricks, M.L., and C.H. Hocutt. 1980. Monitoring of fish in lotic habitats. Pages 205–232 in C.H. Hocutt and J.R. Stauffer, editors. Biological monitoring of fish. Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.
  • Hilton-Taylor, C., G.M. Mace, D.R. Capper, N.J. Collar, S.N. Stuart, C.J. Bibby, C. Pollock, and J.B. Thomsen. 2000. Assessment mismatches must be sorted out: they leave species at risk. Nature (London) 404:541–542.
  • Holland-Bartels, L.E., and M.R. Dewey. 1997. The influence of seine capture efficiency on fish abundance estimates in the upper Mississippi River. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 12:101–111.
  • Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:65–70.
  • Jackson, D.A., S.C. Walker, and M.S. Poesch. 2010. Cluster analysis of fish community data: “New” tools for determining meaningful groupings of sites and species assemblages. Pages 503–527 in K. Gido and D.A. Jackson, editors. Community ecology of stream fishes: concepts, approaches, and techniques. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 73, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Jelks, H.L., S.J. Walsh, N.M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Diaz-Pardo, D.A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N.E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J.S. Nelson, S.P. Platania, B.A. Porter, C.B. Renaud, J.J. Schmitter-Soto, E.B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33:372–386.
  • Johnston, N.T., and P.A. Slaney. 1996. Fish habitat assessment procedures. Watershed Restoration Program, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and Ministry of Forests, Watershed Restoration Technical Circular 8, Vancouver.
  • Kennard, M.J., B.J. Pusey, B.D. Harch, E. Dore, and A.H. Arthington. 2006. Estimating local stream fish assemblage attributes: sampling effort and efficiency at two spatial scales. Marine and Freshwater Research 57:635–653.
  • Kjelson, M.A., and D.R. Colby. 1976. The evaluation and use of gear efficiencies in the estimation of estuarine fish abundance. Pages 416–424 in M.L. Wiley, editor. Estuarine processes. Academic Press, New York.
  • Larimore, R.W. 1961. Fish population and electrofishing success in a warm-water stream. Journal of Wildlife Management 25:1–12.
  • Lazorchak, J.M., D.J. Klemm, and D.V. Peck. 1998. Environmental monitoring and assessment program – surface waters: field operations and methods for measuring the ecological condition of wadeable streams. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
  • Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lyons, J. 1986. Capture efficiency of a beach seine for seven freshwater fishes in a north-temperate lake. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:288–289.
  • Moulton, S.R., J.G. Kennen, R.M. Goldstein, and J.A. Hambrook. 2002. Revised protocols for sampling algal, invertebrate, and fish communities as part of the national water-quality assessment program. U.S. Geographical Survey, File Report 02–150, Reston, Virginia.
  • Muth, R.T., and J.B. Ruppert. 1996. Effects of two electrofishing currents on captive ripe Razorback Suckers and subsequent egg-hatching success. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:473–476.
  • Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, P. Legendre, B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, M. Henry, and H. Stevens. 2008. Vegan: community ecology package, R package version 1.11-0. . Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf. (January 2014).
  • OMNR (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources). 2007. Stream assessment protocol for southern Ontario. OMNR, Picton, Ontario.
  • Paavola, R., T. Muotka, R. Virtanen, J. Heino, D.A. Jackson, and A. Maki-Petays. 2006. Spatial scale affects community concordance among fishes, benthic macroinvertebrates and bryophytes in boreal streams. Ecological Applications 16:368–379.
  • Peres-Neto, P.R., and D.A. Jackson. 2001. How well do multivariate data sets match? Evaluating the association of multivariate biological data sets: comparing the robustness of Mantel test and a Procrustean superimposition approach. Oecologia 129:169–178.
  • Poos, M.S., A.J. Dextrase, A.N. Schwalb, and J. Ackerman. 2010. The secondary invasion of the Round Goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species. Biological Invasions 12:1269–1284.
  • Poos, M.S., and D.A. Jackson. 2012. Addressing the removal of rare species in multivariate bioassessments: the impact of methodological choices. Ecological Indicators 18:82–90.
  • Poos, M.S., N.E. Mandrak, and R.L. McLaughlin. 2007. The effectiveness of two common sampling methods for sampling imperiled freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 70:691–708.
  • Poos, M.S., N.E. Mandrak, and R.L. McLaughlin. 2008. A practical framework for selecting among single species, multi-species and ecosystem-based recovery plans. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:2656–2666.
  • Poos, M.S., S.C. Walker, and D.A. Jackson. 2009. Functional diversity indices can be driven by methodological choices and species richness. Ecology 90:341–346.
  • Pygott, J.R., K. O’Hara, D. Cragg-Hine, and C. Newton. 1990. A comparison of the sampling efficiency of electric fishing and seine netting in two contrasting canal systems. Pages 130–139 in I.G. Cowx, editor. Developments in electric fishing. Fishing News Books, Oxford, UK.
  • R Development Core Team. 2009. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  • Reynolds, J.B. 1996. Electrofishing. Pages 221–253 in B.R. Murphy and D.W. Willis, editors. Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Ricciardi, A., and J.B. Rasmussen. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13:1220–1222.
  • Rothman, K.J. 1990. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1:43–46.
  • Threinen, C.W. 1956. The success of a seine in the sampling of a Largemouth Bass population. Progressive Fish-Culturist 18:81–87.
  • Wiley, M.L., and C.F. Tsai. 1983. The relative efficiencies of electrofishing vs. seines in Piedmont streams of Maryland. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3:243–253.
  • Yoder, C.O., and M.A. Smith. 1999. Using fish assemblages in a state of biological assessment and criteria program: essential concepts and considerations. Pages 17–63 in T.P. Smith, editor. Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.