Comparison of Two Sampling Designs for Fish Assemblage Assessment in a Large River

REFERENCES

• Angermeier, P.L., and R.A. Smogor. 1995. Estimating number of species and relative abundances in stream-fish communities: effects of sampling effort and discontinuous spatial distributions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:936–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, P.J., S.C. F. Palmer, J.C. MacLean, G.W. Smith, B.D. M. Whyte, W.S. C. Gurney, and A.F. Youngson. 2009. Empirical analyses of the length, weight, and condition of adult Atlantic salmon on return to the Scottish coast between 1963 and 2006. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66:844–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, E. 1997. Maine Atlantic Salmon: a national treasure. Atlantic Salmon Unlimited, Hermon, Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, M.G., and A.J. Underwood. 2009. Evaluating accuracy and precision of species-area relationships for multiple estimators and different marine assemblages. Ecology 90:754–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling techniques, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, R.K., and J.A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 345:101–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell, R.K., C.X. Mao, and J. Chang. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, R.A., R.M. Hughes, M.E. McMaster, and D.J. Zafft. 2009. Coldwater fish in rivers. Pages 139–158 in S.A. Bonar, and W.A. Hubert, editors. Standard methods for sampling North American fishes. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Dube, N.R., O.N. Cox, P.J. Ruksznis, M.N. Simpson, K.A. Dunham, R.C. Spencer, G. Wippelhauser, J.R. Stevens, and M. Laser. 2010. Penobscot River: 2009 annual report. Maine Department of Marine Resources, Bureau of Sea Run Fisheries and Habitat, Bangor.
   Google Scholar
• Dufrene, M., and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., and N.E. Mandrak. 2006. Fish assemblage surveys of the lower Thames River, Ontario, using multiple gear types: 2003–2004. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2772.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J.R., M.C. Quist, S.L. Wigen, A.J. Schaefer, T.W. Stewart, and T.M. Isenhart. 2010. Assemblage and population-level responses of stream fish to riparian buffers at multiple spatial scales. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flotemersch, J.E., and K.A. Blocksom. 2005. Electrofishing in boatable rivers: does sampling design affect bioassessment metrics? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 102:263–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flotemersch, J.E., J.B. Stribling, R.M. Hughes, L. Reynolds, M.J. Paul, and C. Wolter. 2011. Site length for biological assessment of boatable rivers. River Research and Applications 27:520–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubiani, E.A., L.C. Gomes, A.A. Agostinho, and G. Baumgartner. 2010. Variations in fish assemblages in a tributary of the upper Parana River, Brazil: a comparison between pre and post-closure phases of dams. River Research and Applications 26:848–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortal, J., P.A. V. Borges, and C. Gaspar. 2006. Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:274–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.M., A.T. Herlihy, W.J. Gerth, and Y. Pan. 2012. Estimating vertebrate, benthic macroinvertebrate, and diatom taxa richness in raftable Pacific Northwest rivers for bioassessment purposes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:3185–3198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.M., P.R. Kaufmann, A.T. Herlihy, S.S. Intelmann, S.C. Corbett, M.C. Arbogast, and R.C. Hjort. 2002. Electrofishing distance needed to estimate fish species richness in raftable Oregon rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1229–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.M., S.G. Paulsen, and J.L. Stoddard. 2000. EMAP-surface waters: a multiassemblage, probability survey of ecological integrity in the U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 422/423:429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.M., and D.V. Peck. 2008. Acquiring data for large aquatic resource surveys: the art of compromise among science, logistics, and reality. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:837–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemin, S.J., and M. Pyron. 2011. Impacts of past glaciation events on contemporary fish assemblages of the Ohio River basin. Journal of Biogeography 38:982–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindt, R., and R. Coe. 2005. Tree diversity analysis: a manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• King, T., J. Williams, W. Davies, and W. Shelton. 1981. Fixed versus random sampling of fishes in a large reservoir. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:563–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinschmidt Associates. 2009. Penobscot River fish assemblage survey second interim report. Kleinschmidt Associates, Pittsfield, Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe, N.W. R., L.D. Corkum, and N.E. Mandrak. 2006. A comparison of methods for sampling fish diversity in shallow offshore waters of large rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:503–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley, T. 2004. Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software 9:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lumley, T. 2011. Survey: analysis of complex survey samples. . R package, version 3.26. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survey/index.html. (February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. 1992. The length of stream to sample with a towed electrofishing unit when fish species richness is estimated. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:198–203.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, M.A., and G.G. Sass. 2012. Assessing fish collections from random and fixed site sampling methods on the Illinois River. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 27:325–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, B., and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, B., and M.J. Mefford. 1999. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MJM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Meador, M.R. 2005. Single-pass versus two-pass boat electrofishing for characterizing river fish assemblages: species richness estimates and sampling distance. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen, J., F.G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, H.H. Minchin, R.B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M.H. H. Stevens, and H. Wagner. 2011. Vegan: community ecology package. . R package, version 3.26. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html. (February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Opperman, J.J., J. Royte, J. Banks, L.R. Day, and C. Apse. 2011. The Penobscot River, Maine, USA: a basin-scale approach to balancing power generation and ecosystem restoration. Ecology and Society [online serial] 16(3):7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M.W. 1990. The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology 71:1195–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRRT (Penobscot River Restoration Trust). 2011. The Penobscot River Restoration Project: timeline. . Available: http://www.penobscotriver.org/content/4031/Timeline./ (May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Quist, M.C., K.G. Gerow, M.R. Bower, and W.A. Hubert. 2006. Random versus fixed-site sampling when monitoring relative abundance of fishes in headwater streams of the upper Colorado River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:1011–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner, S.M. 2003. Six types of species-area curves. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12:441–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneck, F., and A.S. Melo. 2010. Reliable sample sizes for estimating similarity among macroinvertebrate assemblages in tropical streams. Annales de Limnologie 46:93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E.P., and G. Van Belle. 1984. Nonparametric estimation of species richness. Biometrics 40:119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terra, B.F., R.M. Hughes, and F.G. Araujo. 2013. Sampling sufficiency for fish assemblage surveys of tropical Atlantic forest streams, southeastern Brazil. Fisheries 38:150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, N.S., S.G. Paulsen, and D.P. Larsen. 1998. Monitoring for policy-relevant regional trends over time. Ecological Applications 8:246–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2011. Surface water data for Maine: USGS surface-water annual statistics for the Penobscot River at West Enfield, ME (gage 01034500). . Available: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/me/nwis/annual. (December 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Walther, B.A., and S. Morand. 1998. Comparative performance of species richness estimation methods. Parasitology 116:395–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar