Development of a Multimetric Index for Fish Assemblages in a Cold Tailwater in Tennessee

REFERENCES

• Angermeier, P.L., and J.R. Karr. 1986. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on stream-fish communities: considerations in sampling and interpretation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:418–429.
   Google Scholar
• Angradi, T.R., M.S. Pearson, T.M. Jicha, D.L. Taylor, D.W. Bolgrien, M.F. Moffett, K.A. Blocksom, and B.H. Hill. 2009. Using stressor gradients to determine reference expectations for great river fish assemblages. Ecological Indicators 9:748–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, M.B., J.T. Finn, and H.E. Booke. 1988. Streamflow regulation and fish community structure. Ecology 69:382–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, R.M. 1977. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8:255–283.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, A.T., and D.D. Hart. 2005. Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation. Ecological Applications 15:997–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blocksom, K.A. 2003. A performance comparison of metric scoring methods for a multimetric index for Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams. Environmental Management 31:670–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, Z.H., M.C. Freeman, and D.L. Watson. 1998. Index of biotic integrity applied to a flow-regulated river system. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 50(1996):26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, C.J. 2013. Evaluating the biotic integrity and spatio-temporal variation in tributary fish communities. Master's thesis. Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville.
   Google Scholar
• Camargo, J.A., and N.J. Voelz. 1998. Biotic and abiotic changes along the recovery gradient of two impounded rivers with different impoundment use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 50:143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., D.P. Larsen, R.M. Hughes, P.L. Angermeier, and T.M. Patton. 2011. Sampling effort affects multivariate comparisons of stream assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21:701–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K.R., and M. Ainsworth. 1993. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series 92:205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K.R., and R.N. Gorley. 2006. PRIMER v 6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, K.J. 2009. Linking multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess the ecological condition of streams. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 157:113–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutant, C.C. 1977. Compilation of temperature preference data. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34:739–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauwalter, D.C., and E.J. Pert. 2003. Effect of electrofishing effort on an index of biotic integrity. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:1247–1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, G.J., and P.W. Bettoli. 2001. Seasonal fluctuations in growth and condition of trout in a southeastern tailwater. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 53(1999):100–109.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, J.C. 2011. Predicting biological impairment from habitat assessments. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 182:259–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M.R., S.J. Cooke, D.A. Patterson, and J.S. Macdonald. 2008. Cold shock and fish. Journal of Fish Biology 73:1491–1530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, M.T., and D.L. Pereira. 2003. Development of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for small inland lakes in central Minnesota. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1105–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, E.B., T.P. Simon, and R. Ovies. 1999. Influence of the family Catostomidae on the metrics developed for a great rivers index of biotic integrity. Pages 203–224 in T.P. Simon, editor. Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Etnier, D.A., and W.C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, C.A., R.L. Ragsdale, and T.J. Hall. 2009. Patterns of fish community structure in a long-term watershed-scale study to address the aquatic ecosystem effects of pulp and paper mill discharges in four U.S. receiving streams. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 5:219–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flotemersch, J.E., J.B. Stribling, R.M. Hughes, L. Reynolds, M.J. Paul, and C. Wolter. 2011. Site length for biological assessment of boatable rivers. River Research and Applications 27:520–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fore, L.S., J.R. Karr, and R.W. Wisseman. 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:212–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M.C., Z.H. Bowen, K.D. Bovee, and E.R. Irwin. 2001. Flow and habitat effects on juvenile fish abundance in natural and altered flow regimes. Ecological Applications 11:179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M.C., C.M. Pringle, and C.R. Jackson. 2007. Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDNR (Georgia Department of Natural Resources). 2005. Standard operating procedures for conducting biomonitoring on fish communities in the Piedmont ecoregion of Georgia. GDNR, Wildlife Resources Division, Fisheries Section, Social Circle.
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsen, J. 1995. Additive biological indices for resource management. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14:451–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, J.A., J.M. Nestler, and J.B. Layzer. 1990. Habitat factors in tailwaters with emphasis on peaking hydropower. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report EL-90-2, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, C.S., F.J. Valesini, and K.R. Clarke. 2012. A method for selecting health index metrics in the absence of independent measures of ecological condition. Ecological Indicators 19:240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, B.C. 1987. Susceptibility of young-of-the-year fishes to downstream displacement by flooding. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:851–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C.P., J.R. Olson, and R.A. Hill. 2010. The reference condition: predicting benchmarks for ecological and water-quality assessments. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:312–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R.M. 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. Pages 31–48 . in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, A.K. 2003. Longitudinal patterns of community structure for stream fishes in a Virginia tailwater. Master's thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, E.R., and M.C. Freeman. 2002. Proposal for adaptive management to conserve biotic integrity in a regulated segment of the Tallapoosa River, Alabama, USA. Conservation Biology 16:1212–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, M.J., L.S. Fore, and J.R. Karr. 1995. Biological monitoring of fish assemblages in Tennessee Valley Reservoirs. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 11:263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., and G. Harp. 2005. Spatio-temporal changes of benthic macroinvertebrates in a cold Arkansas tailwater. Hydrobiologia 537:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J.R., K.D. Fausch, P.L. Angermeier, P.R. Yant, and I.J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication 5, Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Kennard, M.J., B.D. Harch, B.J. Pusey, and A.H. Arthington. 2006. Accurately defining the reference condition for summary biotic metrics: a comparison of four approaches. Hydrobiologia 572:151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsolving, A.D., and M.B. Bain. 1993. Fish assemblage recovery along a riverine disturbance gradient. Ecological Applications 3:531–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, R.R., M.B. Gregory, and A.K. Wales. 2008. Relating streamflow characteristics to specialized insectivores in the Tennessee River Valley: a regional approach. Ecohydrology 1:394–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, R.W. 2001. A preliminary index of biological integrity for fish assemblages of small coldwater streams in Vermont. Northeastern Naturalist 8:219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layzer, J.B., and E.M. Scott. 2006. Restoration and colonization of freshwater mussels and fish in a southeastern United States tailwater. River Research and Applications 22:475–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J., L. Wang, and T.D. Simonson. 1996. Development and validation of an index of biotic integrity for coldwater streams in Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:241–253.
   Google Scholar
• Manolakos, E., H. Virani, and V. Novotny. 2007. Extracting knowledge on the links between the water body stressors and biotic integrity. Water Research 41:4041–4050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, L.E., J.N. Aycock, and K.J. Killgore. 2012. A direct-gradient multivariate index of biotic condition. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:1637–1648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCDENR (North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources). 2006. Standard operating procedure: biological monitoring. Stream fish community assessment program, version 4. NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh.
   Google Scholar
• Olden, J.D., and R.J. Naiman. 2010. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biology 55:86–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M.S., T.R. Angradi, D.W. Bolgrien, T.M. Jicha, D.L. Taylor, M.F. Moffett, and B.H. Hill. 2011. Multimetric fish indices for midcontinent (USA) great rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140:1547–1564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J.W., and T.J. Kwak. 2003. Fish assemblage changes in an Ozark river after impoundment: a long-term perspective. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynoldson, T.B., R.H. Norris, V.H. Resh, K.E. Day, and D.M. Rosenberg. 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16:833–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, B.D., A.T. Warner, J.L. Meyer, and K. Lutz. 2006. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications 22:297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roset, N., G. Grenouillet, D. Goffaux, D. Pont, and P. Kestemont. 2007. A review of existing fish assemblage indicators and methodologies. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14:395–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 2010. SAS/STAT for Windows, version 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Scheidegger, K.J., and M.B. Bain. 1995. Larval fish distribution and microhabitat use in free-flowing and regulated rivers. Copeia 1995:125–135.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, I.J., and P.L. Angermeier. 1995. Spatial variation in demographic processes of lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. Pages 392–401 . in J.L. Nielsen, editor. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 17, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, E.J., M.V. Hoyer, and D.E. Canfield Jr. 1999. An index of biotic integrity: a test with limnological and fish data from sixty Florida lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:564–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E.M. 1999. Tailwater fish index (TFI) development for the Tennessee River tributary tailwaters. Pages 507–522 . in T.P. Simon, editor. Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of information. Bell System Technical Journal 27:379–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, T.P., and J. Lyons. 1995. Application of the index of biotic integrity to evaluate water resource integrity in freshwater ecosystems. Pages 245–262 . in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Southerland, M.T., G.M. Rogers, M.J. Kline, R.P. Morgan, D.M. Boward, P.F. Kazyak, R.J. Klauda, and S.A. Stranko. 2007. Improving biological indicators to better assess the condition of streams. Ecological Indicators 7:751–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, L.E., J.P. Shannon, and D.W. Blinn. 1997. Colorado River benthic ecology in Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA: dam, tributary and geomorphological influences. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13:129–149.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J.L., A.T. Herlihy, D.V. Peck, R.M. Hughes, T.R. Whittier, and E. Tarquinio. 2008. A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:878–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J.L., D.P. Larsen, C.P. Hawkins, R.K. Johnson, and R.H. Norris. 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications 16:1267–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swink, W.D., and K.E. Jacobs. 1983. Influence of a Kentucky flood-control reservoir on the tailwater and headwater fish populations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3:197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, C.S., and T.R. Bly. 2002. Health and condition of trout in the Norfork tailwater, Arkansas, following hypoxic periods. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 54(2000):157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.F. 1972. Life history of the Eastern Johnny Darter, Etheostoma olmstedi Storer, in cold tailwater and sewage-polluted water. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101:80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority). 2004. Reservoir operations study, final programmatic environmental impact statement. TVA, Knoxville.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, C.C., and C.M. Taylor. 1999. Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction gradient. Conservation Biology 13:912–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J.V., and J.A. Stanford. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. Pages 29–42 . in T.D. Fontaine and S.M. Bartell, editors. Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Whittier, T.R., R.M. Hughes, and D.V. Peck. 2001. Comment: test of an index of biotic integrity. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittier, T.R., R.M. Hughes, J.L. Stoddard, G.A. Lomnicky, D.V. Peck, and A.T. Herlihy. 2007. A structured approach for developing indices of biotic integrity: three examples from streams and rivers in the western USA. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:718–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar