Assessment of the Risks of Transgenic Fluorescent Ornamental Fishes to the United States Using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK)

REFERENCES

• Aiken, J.K., C.S. Findlay, and F. Chapleau. 2012. Long-term assessment of the effect of introduced predatory fish on Minnow diversity in a regional protected area. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 69:1798–1805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, D., F. Ribeiro, P.M. Leunda, L. Vilizzi, and G.H. Copp. 2013. Effectiveness of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes, to perform risk identification assessments in the Iberian Peninsula. Risk Analysis 33:1404–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanuma, K., N. Nakajima, A.H. Hashimoto, and Y. Aoki. 2008. Genetically modified, red fluorescent Zebrafish: detection, crossing, inheritance of red fluorescence, and tolerance to low temperatures. Journal of Environmental Biotechnology 8:105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, A. 2012. Genetically modified pet fish worries Florida environmentalists. Washington Post (September 3). Available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/genetically-modified-pet-fish-worries-florida-environmentalists/2012/08/31/71e909fc-ac19-11e1-9369-05cf05b03c2e_story.html. (July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bratspies, R.M. 2005. Glowing in the dark: how America's first transgenic animal escaped regulation. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology 6:457–504.
   Google Scholar
• CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2003. Evaluation of request to exempt transgenic–fluorescent Zebrafish from restricted species permit requirements. CDFG, . Sacramento. Available: http://www.glofish.com/files/CA-Fish-Game-Recommendation.pdf. (June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2013. Restricted species laws and regulations: importation, transportation, and possession of wild animals. California Natural Resources Agency, Manual 671, . Sacramento. Available: http://www.nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=28427. (July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Copp, G.H. 2013. The Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for nonnative freshwater fishes: a summary of current applications. Risk Analysis 33:1394–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G.H., J.R. Britton, G. Jeney, J.-P. Joly, F. Gherardi, S. Gollasch, R.E. Gozlan, G. Jones, A. MacLeod, P.J. Midtlying, L. Miossec, A.D. Numm, A. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, B. Oidtmann, S. Olenin, E. Peeler, I.C. Russell, D. Savini, E. Tricarico, and M. Thrush. 2008. Risk assessment protocols and decision making tools for use of alien species in aquaculture and stock enhancement. European Commission, Project IMPASSE, Brussels. Available: http://www2.hull.ac.uk/science/pdf/IMPASSE_44142_D3-2final.pdf. (July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Copp, G.H., R. Garthwaite, and R.E. Gozlan. 2005. Risk identification and assessment of nonnative freshwater fishes: a summary of concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21:371–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G.H., L. Vilizzi, J. Mumford, G.M. Fenwick, M.J. Godard, and R.E. Gozlan. 2009. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis 29:457–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corfield, J., B. Diggles, C. Jubb, R.M. McDowall, A. Moore, A. Richards, and D.K. Rowe. 2007. Review of the impacts of introduced aquarium fish species that have established wild populations in Australia. Draft Final Report to the Australian Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Cortemeglia, C., and T.L. Beitinger. 2005. Temperature tolerances of wild-type and red transgenic Zebra Danios. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1431–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortemeglia, C., and T.L. Beitinger. 2006a. Projected U.S. distributions of transgenic and wildtype Zebra Danios, Danio rerio, based on temperature tolerance data. Journal of Thermal Biology 31:422–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortemeglia, C., and T.L. Beitinger. 2006b. Susceptibility of transgenic and wild-type Zebra Danios, Danio rerio, to predation. Environmental Biology of Fish 76:93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortemeglia, C., T.L. Beitinger, J.H. Kennedy, and T. Walters. 2008. Field confirmation of laboratory-determined lower temperature tolerance of transgenic and wild-type Zebra Danios, Danio rerio. American Midland Naturalist 160:477–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, G.V., A.M. Cooper, K.M. Pennington, and L.S. Sharpe. In press. Methodologies and special considerations for environmental risk analysis of genetically modified aquatic biocontrol organisms. Biological Invasions. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0391-x.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). 2013. Database on introductions of aquatic species. FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome. Available: http://www.fao.org/fishery/introsp/search/en. (May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 2003. FDA statement regarding Glofish. December 9, 2003. FDA, Washington, D.C. . Available: http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/ucm161437.htm. (July 2013.)
   Google Scholar
• FDA–CVM (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine). 2011. Regulation of genetically engineered animals containing heritable recombinant DNA constructs, revised edition. FDA–CVM, Guidance for industry 187, Washington, D.C. . Available: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/GuidanceforIndustry/UCM113903.pdf. (July 2013).
   Google Scholar
• FDACS (Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services). 2004a. Comment on transgenic aquatic species review requested. Florida Aquaculture (January):2.
   Google Scholar
• FDACS (Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services). 2004b. Transgenic aquatic species activities. Florida Aquaculture (March):2.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, B., R. Schnick, D. Skaar, J. Anderson, L. Demong, D. Duffield, W. Horton, and J. Steinkjer. 2010. Planning and standard operation procedures for the use of rotenone in fish management: rotenone SOP manual. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Froese, R., and D. Pauly, editors. 2013. Fishbase. Available: http://fishbase.org. (May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., N. Maclean, R.H. Devlin, R. Martinez, O. Omitogun, and M.P. Estrada. 2007. Gene construct and expression: information relevant for risk assessment and management. Pages 95–111 . in A.R. Kapuscinski, K.R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3. Methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., H. Wan, T.L. Tang, H. Wang, M. Chen, and T. Yan. 2003. Development of transgenic fish for ornamental and bioreactor by strong expression of fluorescent proteins in the skeletal muscle. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 308:58–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D.R., C.A. Gantz, C.L. Jerde, W.L. Chadderton, R.P. Keller, and P.D. Champion. 2012. Weed risk assessment for aquatic plants: modification of a New Zealand system for the United States. PLoS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 7(7):e40031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, S., and J.E. Hill. 2012. Risk analysis of Barramundi Perch Lates calcarifer aquaculture in Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:577–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, B.C., J.L. White, and R.J. Nakamoto. 2004. An emergent multiple-predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream fish assemblage. Ecology 85:127–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, K.R., and S.C. Barry. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biological Invasions 10:483–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, K.R., A.R. Kapuscinski, G. Dana, S. Li, and R.H. Devlin. 2007. Introduction to environmental risk assessment for transgenic fish. Pages 1–28 . in A.R. Kapuscinski, K.R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. 2007. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3. Methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J.E., A.R. Kapuscinski, and T. Pavlowich. 2011. Fluorescent transgenic Zebra Danio more vulnerable to predators than wild-type fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140:1001–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J.E., and P. Zajicek. 2007. National aquatic species risk analysis: a call for improved implementation. Fisheries 32:530–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, P. 2010. Comparative study of aggressive behaviour in transgenic and wild-type Zebrafish Danio rerio (Hamilton) and the Flying Barb Esomus danricus (Hamilton), and their susceptibility to predation by the Snakehead Channa striatus (Bloch). Italian Journal of Zoology 77:102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, P., J.J. Bai, X. Ye, Q. Jian, M. Chen, and X.Q. Chen. 2011. Shoaling and mate choice of wild-type Tanichthys albonubes in the presence of red fluorescent transgenic conspecifics. Journal of Fish Biology 78:127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski, A.R. 2005. Current scientific understanding of the environmental biosafety of transgenic fish and shellfish. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties 24:309–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski, A.R., and E.M. Hallerman. 1990. Transgenic fish and public policy: anticipating environmental impacts of transgenic fish. Fisheries 15(1):2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski, A.R., and E.M. Hallerman. 1991. Implications of introduction of transgenic fish into natural ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48(Supplement 1):99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski, A.R., J.J. Hard, K.M. Paulson, R. Neira, A. Ponnah, W. Kamonrat, W. Mwanja, I.A. Fleming, J. Gallardo, R.H. Devlin, and J. Trisak. 2007a. Approaches to assessing gene flow. Pages 112–150 . in A.R. Kapuscinski, K.R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. 2007. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3. Methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski, A.R., K.R. Hayes, S. Li, and G. Dana, editors. 2007b. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms, volume 3. Methodologies for transgenic fish. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Khee, S.W. 2006. Possible ecological impacts caused by GFP transgenic Zebrafish, Danio rerio. Doctoral dissertation. National University of Singapore, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Koehn, J.D., and R.F. MacKenzie. 2004. Priority management actions for alien freshwater fish species in Australia. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Science 38:457–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottek, M., J. Grieser, C. Beck, B. Rudolf, and F. Rubel. 2006. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15:259–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulhanek, S.A., A. Ricciardi, and B. Leung. 2011. Is invasion history a useful tool for predicting the impacts of the world's worst aquatic invasive species? Ecological Applications 21:189–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, L.L. Jr., J.E. Hill, L. Vilizzi, S. Hardin, and G.H. Copp. 2013. Revisions of the fish invasiveness scoring kit (FISK) for its application in warmer climatic zones, with particular reference to peninsular Florida. Risk Analysis 33:1414–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, N., and R.J. Laight. 2000. Transgenic fish: an evaluation of benefits and risks. Fish and Fisheries 1:146–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, W.M., and R.D. Howard. 1999. Possible ecological risks of transgenic organism release when transgenes affect mating success: sexual selection and the Trojan gene hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:13853–13856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, W.M., and R.D. Howard. 2002. Assessment of possible ecological risks and hazards of transgenic fish with implications for other sexually reproducing organisms. Transgenic Research 11:101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagare, P., B.A. Aglave, and M.O. Lokhande. 2009. Genetically engineered Zebrafish: fluorescent beauties with practical applications. Asian Journal of Animal Science 4:126–129.
   Google Scholar
• The one that got away. 2004. Editorial. Nature Biotechnology 22:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nico, L.G., J.D. Williams, and H. Jelks. 2005. Black Carp: biological synopsis and risk assessment of an introduced fish. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 32, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• OIE (Office International des Epizooties). 2012. Aquatic animal health code (2012). World Organization for Animal Health, Paris. Available: http://www.oie.int/international-standard-setting/aquatic-code/access-online. (May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Onikura, N., J. Nakajima, R. Inui, H. Mizutani, M. Kobayakawa, S. Fukuda, and T. Mukai. 2012. Evaluating the potential of invasion by nonnative freshwater fishes in northern Kyushu Island, Japan, using the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit. Ichthyological Research 58:382–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, R. 2003. Generic nonindigenous aquatic organisms risk analysis review process. Pages 415–438 . in G.M. Ruiz and J.T. Carleton, editors. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Otts, S.S. In press. U.S. regulatory framework for genetic biocontrol of invasive fish. Biological Invasions. DOI:10.1007/s10530-012-0327-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, X., H. Zhan, and Z. Gong. 2008. Ornamental expression of red fluorescent protein in transgenic founders of White Skirt Tetra (Gymnocorymbus ternetzi). Marine Biotechnology 10:497–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddie, B. 2008. Grounded theory of Florida aquarium retailers’ acceptance of the Glofish. Doctoral dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Pethiyagoda, R., M. Meegaskumura, and K. Maduwage. 2012. A synopsis of the South Asian fishes referred to Puntius (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Explorations of Freshwaters 23:69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheloung, P.C., P.A. Williams, and S.R. Halloy. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management 57:239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, R.K. 2005. Mutating Nemo: assessing the environmental risks and proposing the regulation of the transgenic Glofish. Administrative Law Review 57:903–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, H.A., C.-T. Han, R.G. Hopkins, M.L. Failla, W.W. Ward, and C.N. Stewart Jr. 2003. Safety assessment of recombinant green fluorescent protein orally administered to weaned rats. Journal of Nutrition 133:1909–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaner, N.C., P.A. Steinbach, and R.Y. Tsien. 2005. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nature Methods 2:905–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobodkin, L.B. 2001. The good, the bad, and the reified. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snekser, J.L., S.P. McRobert, C.E. Murphy, and E.D. Clotfelter. 2006. Aggregation behavior in wild-type and transgenic Zebrafish. Ethology 112:181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, R., M.K. Fatema, M. Reichard, K.A. Huq, M.A. Wahab, Z.F. Ahmed, and C. Smith. 2006. The distribution and habitat preferences of the Zebrafish in Bangladesh. Journal of Fish Biology 69:1435–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, R., G. Gerlach, C. Lawrence, and C. Smith. 2008. The behaviour and ecology of the Zebrafish, Danio rerio. Biological Reviews 83:13–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, C.N., Jr. 2006. Go with the glow: fluorescent proteins to light transgenic organisms. Trends in Biotechnology 24:155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, K.A., J.E. Hill, and L.G. Nico. 2012. Eastern Mosquitofish resists invasion by nonindigenous poeciliids through agonistic behaviors. Biological Invasions 14:1515–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonn, W.M., and J.J. Magnuson. 1982. Patterns in the species composition and richness of fish assemblages in northern Wisconsin lakes. Ecology 63:1149–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2013. Nonindigenous aquatic species database. USGS, Gainesville. Available: http://nas.er.usgs.gov. (May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Van Eenennaam, A.L., and P.G. Olin. 2006. Careful risk assessment needed to evaluate transgenic fish. California Agriculture 60:126–131.
   Google Scholar
• Vilizzi, L., and G.H. Copp. 2013. Application of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater fishes, in the Murray–Darling basin (southeastern Australia). Risk Analysis 33:1432–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welcomme, R.L. 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available: http://www.fao.org/docrep/X5628E/X5628E00.htm. (May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Welcomme, R.L., and C. Vidthayanon. 2003. The impacts of introductions and stocking of exotic species in the Mekong basin and policies for their control. Mekong River Commission, Technical Paper 9, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
   Google Scholar