Modified Water Diversion Structures Can Behaviorally Deter Juvenile Chinook Salmon from Entrainment

REFERENCES

• Allen G., S. Amaral, and J. Black. 2007. Fish protection technologies: the US experience. Pages 371–309 in S. Rajagopal, H. A. Jenner, and V. P. Venugopalan, editors. Operational and environmental consequences of large industrial cooling water systems. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G., S. Amaral, and J. Black. 2012. Fish protection technologies: the U.S. experience. Pages 371–390 in S. Rajagopal, H. A. Jenner, and V. P. Venugopalan, editors. Operational and environmental consequences of large industrial cooling water systems. Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. W., and R. Vinsonhaler. 1957. Use of louvers for guiding fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 86:38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijs, M. C. M., and C. J. L. Taylor. 2007. Fish impingement and prevention seen in the light of population dynamics. Pages 391–409 in S. Rajagopal, H. A. Jenner, and V. P. Venugopalan, editors. Operational and environmental consequences of large industrial cooling water systems. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Čada, G. F., and M. J. Sale. 1993. Status of fish passage facilities at nonfederal hydropower projects. Fisheries 18(7):4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CalFish. 2012. California fish passage assessment database. Available: www.calfish.org. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Calles, O., S. Karlsson, M. Hebrand, and C. Comoglio. 2012. Evaluating technical improvements for downstream migrating diadromous fish at a hydroelectric plant. Ecological Engineering 48:30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, G., J. Morinaka, J. Lindberg, R. Fujimura, B. Baskerville-Bridges, J. Hobbs, G. Tigan, and E. Luke. 2012. Pre-screen loss and fish facility efficiency for Delta Smelt at the south Delta's state water project, California San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science [online serial] 10(4):article 3.
   Google Scholar
• CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2014a. State and federally listed endangered and threatened animals of California. Available: www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/TEAnimals.pdf. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2014b. Statewide fish screening policy, Section 6100 et seq. of California Fish and Game code. Available: www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/Resources/Projects/Engin/Engin_ScreenPolicy.asp. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 2014. Draft California water plan, update 2013. Available: www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/cwpu2013/prd/index.cfm. (February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, E. D., A. R. Hearn, C. J. Michel, A. J. Ammann, S. T. Lindley, M. J. Thomas, P. T. Sandstrom, G. P. Singer, M. L. Peterson, R. B. MacFarlane, and A. P. Klimley. 2012. Diel movements of out-migrating Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) smolts in the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed. Environmental Biology of Fish 96:273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, L., and L. D. Buffaloe. 1998. Delta agricultural diversion evaluation: summary report, 1993–1995. Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Bay/Delta Estuary, Technical Report 61, West Sacramento, California.
   Google Scholar
• DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans). 1995. Freshwater intake end-of-pipe fish screen guideline. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Ducharme, L. J. A. 1972. An application of louver deflectors for guiding Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) smolts from power turbines. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29:1397–1404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, E. C., M. H. Gessel, and J. G. Williams. 2009. Development of successful fish passage structures for downstream migrants requires knowledge of their behavioural response to accelerating flow. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:2109–2117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, E. Y., R. Churchwell, and J. J. Cech Jr. 2007. Effects of water velocity and trash rack architecture on juvenile fish passage and interactions: a simulation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:1177–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, C. H., and H. W. Li. 1983. Behavioral response of juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to trash rack bar spacing. California Fish and Game 69:18–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., P. B. Moyle, R. M. Quinoñes, J. Israel, and S. Purdy. 2012. Impending extinction of salmon, steelhead, and trout (Salmonidae) in California. Environmental Biology of Fish 96:1169–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, P. S., M. H. Gessel, and J. G. Williams. 2005a. Seaward migrating subyearling Chinook Salmon avoid overhead cover. Journal of Fish Biology 67:1381–1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kynard, B., and C. Buerkett. 1997. Passage and behavior of adult American Shad in an experimental louver bypass system. Journal of Fisheries Management 17:734–742.
   Google Scholar
• Lemasson, B. H., J. W. Haefner, and M. D. Bowen. 2008. The effect of avoidance behavior on predicting fish passage rates through water diversion structures. Ecological Modelling 219:178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, O. W., and J. Spencer. 1939. Fish screen in irrigation diversions. Progressive Fish-Culturist 6:18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, P. B., J. V. E. Katz, and R. M. Quinones. 2011. Rapid decline of California's native inland fishes: a status assessment. Biological Conservation 144:2414–2423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle, P. B., and J. A. Israel. 2005. Untested assumptions: effectiveness of screening diversions for conservation of fish populations. Fisheries 30(5):20–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussen, T. D., and J. J. Cech Jr. 2013. The roles of vision and the lateral-line system in Sacramento Splittail's fish-screen avoidance behaviors: evaluating vibrating screens as potential fish deterrents. Environmental Biology of Fish 96:971–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussen, T. D., D. Cocherell, Z. Hockett, A. Ercan, H. Bandeh, M. L. Kavvas, J. J. Cech Jr., and N. A. Fangue. 2013. Assessing juvenile Chinook Salmon behavior and entrainment risk near unscreened water diversions: large flume simulations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:130–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussen, T. D., D. Cocherell, J. B. Poletto, J. S. Reardon, Z. Hockett, A. Ercan, H. Bandeh, M. L. Kavvas, J. J. Cech Jr., and N. A. Fangue. 2014a. Unscreened water diversion pipes pose an entrainment risk to the threatened Green Sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris. PLoS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 9(1):e86321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussen, T. D., O. Patton, D. Cocherell, A. Ercan, H. Bandeh, M. L. Kavvas, J. J. Cech Jr., and N. A. Fangue. 2014b. Can behavioral fish-guidance devices protect juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from entrainment into unscreened water diversion pipes? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 71:1209–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1997. Fish screening criteria for anadromous salmonids. NMFS, Southwest Region, Santa Rosa, California.
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2009. Biological opinion and conference opinion on the long-term operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project. NMFS, Southwest Region, Long Beach, California.
   Google Scholar
• OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1995. Fish passage technologies: protection at hydropower facilities. OTA, Report OTA-ENV-641, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Poletto, J. B., D. E. Cocherell, T. D. Mussen, A. Ercan, H. Bandeh, M. L. Kavvas, J. J. Cech Jr., and N. A. Fangue. 2014. Efficacy of a sensory deterrent and pipe modifications in decreasing entrainment of juvenile Green Sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris) at unscreened water diversions. Conservation Physiology [online serial] 2(1):cou056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portz, D. E. 2007. Fish-holding-associated stress in Sacramento River Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) at South Delta fish salvage operations: effects on plasma constituents, swimming performance, and predator avoidance. Dissertation Abstracts International B Sciences and Engineering 69: 45–75, 130.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, D. A., R. S. McKinley, N. Kouwen, W. Eddy, and R. K. Booth. 2002. Use of telemetry and hydraulic modeling to evaluate and improve fish guidance efficiency at a louver and bypass system for downstream-migrating Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) smolts and kelts. Hydrobiologia 483:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D., C. Katopodis, and N. Rajaratnam. 2007. An experimental study of louvers for fish diversion. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 34:770–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, J. C., K. Aarestrup, H. Malte, U. H. Thygesen, H. Baktoft, A. Koed, M. G. Deacon, K. F. Cubitt, and R. S. McKinley. 2011. Linking individual behaviour and migration success in Salmo salar smolts approaching a water withdrawal site: implications for management. Aquatic Living Resources 24:201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, E. P. 2010. Fish protection technologies: a status report. Environmental Science and Policy 3(Supplement):S349–S359.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Technical development document for the final regulations addressing cooling water intake structures for new facilities. USEPA, Office of Science and Technology, Engineering and Analysis Division, Report EPA-821-R-01-036, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2014. Water quality data, Sacramento River at Freeport, site 11447650. USGS, Reston, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, F. J., Y. G. Mussalli, R. T. Wagner, and E. P. Taft. 1982. Water intake structures design for fish protection. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
   Google Scholar