- See Gerard A. Hauser and Donald P. Cushman, “McKeon's Philosophy of Communication: The Architectonic and Interdisciplinary Arts,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6 (1973), 211–234; John P. Scott, “Critical Social Theory: An Introduction and Critique,” British Journal of Sociology, 29 (March 1978), 1–20.
- William Sullivan, “Communication and the Recovery of Meaning: An Interpretation of Habermas,” International Philosophical Quarterly, 18 (1978), 70.
- Sullivan, p. 70.
- Jürgen Habermas, “Some Distinctions in Universal Pragmatics: A Working Paper,” Theory and Society, 3 (1976), 155.
- Habermas, “Some Distinctions in Universal Pragmatics,” p. 156.
- Jürgen Habermas, “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence,” Inquiry, 13 (Winter 1970), 360–375.
- Thomas McCarthy, “Translator's Introduction,” in Jürgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975), pp. xiii–xiv.
- R. R. McGuire, “Speech Acts, Communicative Competence and the Paradox of Authority,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10 (Winter 1977), 37–38.
- Jürgen Habermas, “On Systematically Distorted Communication,” Inquiry, 13 (Autumn 1970), 205–218.
- Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, p. 107.
- Habermas, “Towards a Theory of Communicative Competence,” pp. 371–372.
- Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, p. 108.
- Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 181–191.
- Hans G. Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics, tr. D. E. Linge (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1976), pp. 34–35.
- Donald P. Cushman and Phillip K. Tompkins, “A Theory of Rhetoric for Contemporary Society,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, Winter 1980, in press.
- Richard Weaver, Visions of Order (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press, 1964), chapters 3 and 4.
- Thomas Frentz and Thomas Farrell, “Language-Action: A Paradigm for Communication,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62 (December 1976), 333–349.
- Cushman and Tompkins, in press.
- Dieter Misgeld, “Discourse and Conversation: The Theory of Communicative Competence and Hermeneutics in the Light of the Debate Between Habermas and Gadamer,” Cultural Hermeneutics, 4 (1977), 321–344.
- Scott, pp. 13–14.
- John Dewey, How Men Think (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1932).
- Lloyd Bitzer, “The Rhetorical Situation,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1 (January 1968), 6.
- Ernan McMullin, “Two Faces of Science,” Review of Metaphysics, 27 (June 1974), 655–676.
A Critical Reconstruction of Jürgen Habermas' Holistic Approach to Rhetoric as Social Philosophy
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.