References
- Lakatos, I. (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
- Lichtman, A. J. & Rohrer, D. M. (1975). A general theory of the counterplan. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 12, 70–79.
- Lichtman, A. J. & Rohrer, D. M. (1980). The logic of policy dispute. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 16, 236–247.
- Lichtman, A. J. & Rohrer, D. M. (1982). Policy dispute and paradigm evaluation: A response to Rowland. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 145–150.
- Lichtman, A. J. & Rohrer, D. M. (1970). Role of the criteria case in the conceptual framework of academic debate, parts 1–5. ISSUES , 3, series of articles appearing in five successive installments, Jan-May.
- Lichtman, A. , Garvin, C. , & Corsi, J. (1973). The alternative justification affirmative: A new case form. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 10, 59–69.
- Paulsen, J. W. & Rhodes, J. (1979). The counter-warrant as negative strategy: A modest proposal. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 15, 205–210.
- Rowland, R. (1982). The primacy of standards for paradigm evaluation: A rejoinder. Journal of the American Forensic Association 18, 154–160.
- Rowland, R. (1982). Standards for paradigm evaluation. Journal of the American Forensic Association 18, 133–141.
- Zarefsky, D. & Henderson, B. (1983). Hypothesis-testing in theory and practice. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 19, 179–185.