References
- Balthrop, V. W. (1983). The debate judge as “critic of argument”: Toward a transcendent perspective. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 20, 1–15.
- Brockriede, W. and Ehninger, D. (1960). Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 46, 44–53.
- Cox, J. R. (1981). Investigating policy argument as a field. In G. Ziegelmueller and J. Rhodes (Eds.), Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 126–142). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Dudczak, C. (1983, April). Coping with information overload: Generic argument as the least common denominator. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association convention, Lincoln, Nebraska.
- Ehninger, D. and Brockriede, W. (1963). Decision by debate. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.
- Ehninger, D. and Brockriede, W. (1978). Decision by debate. 2nd. ed. New York: Harper and Row.
- Freeley, A. J. (1981). Argumentation and debate: Reasoned decision making. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Gass, R. H. (1985, February). The role and purpose of debate theory in debate rounds. Paper presented at the Western Speech Communication Association convention, Fresno, California.
- Goodnight, G. T. (1981). The re-union of argumentation and debate theory. In G. Ziegelmueller and J. Rhodes (Eds.), Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 415–432). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Hollihan, T. (1983, April). Generic argument: Contrivance of scoundrels or refuge for the unimaginative. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association convention, Lincoln, Nebraska.
- Klumpp, J. F. (1981). A dramatistic approach to fields. In G. Ziegelmueller and J. Rhodes (Eds.), Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 44–55). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Patterson, J. W. and Zarefsky, D. (1983). Contemporary debate. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Pfau, M. (1979). A systematic approach to debating the second negative. In D. Thomas (Ed), Advanced Debate: Readings in Theory, Practice, and Teaching (pp. 188–199). Skokie, IL: National Textbook.
- Pfau, M. (1983, April). A reasonable approach to generic argument. Paper presented at the Central State Speech Association convention, Lincoln, Nebraska.
- Phillips, N. (1983, April). Generic ideas in search of a topic: comments on the papers. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association convention, Lincoln, Nebraska.
- Rowland, R. (1981). Argument fields. In G. Ziegelmueller and J. Rhodes (Eds), Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 56–79). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Rowland, R. (1982). The influence of purpose on fields of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 228–245.
- Rowland, R. (1983). The philosophical presuppositions of value debate. In D. Zarefsky , M. O. Sillars , and J. Rhodes (Eds), Argument in ‘Transition: Proceedings of the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 822–836). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Rowland, R. (1986). The relationship between realism and debatability in policy advocacy. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22, 125–134.
- Toulmin, S. (1958). 'The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Toulmin, S. , Rieke, R. , and Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning , 2nd ed. New York: MacMillan.
- Ulrich, W. (1985). Debating generic disadvantages. Debate issues , 18, 14–16.
- Unger, J. J. (1981, November). The words of a debate proposition and the debate subject matter: Friends or foes. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, Anaheim, California.
- Walker, G. (1983, April). The appropriate use and inappropriate abuse of generic arguments in competitive debate. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association convention, Lincoln, Nebraska.
- Walker, G. (1986, February). Counterresolutional positions in policy and non-policy debate: Counterplans and counterpolicies. Paper presented at the Western Speech Communication Association convention, Tucson, Arizona.
- Wenzel, J. W. (1982). On fields of argument as propositional systems. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 204–213.
- Willard, C. A. (1980). Some questions about Toulmin's view of argument fields. In J. Rhodes and S. Newell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 348–400). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Willard, C. A. (1981a). Argument fields and theories of logical types. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 17, 129–145.
- Willard, C. A. (1981b). Argument fields: A cartesian meditation. In G. Ziegelmueller and J. Rhodes (Eds.), Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 1–20). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Willard, C. A. (1982). Argument fields. In J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Zarefsky, D. (1980). Argumentation and forensics. In J. Rhodes and S. Newell (Eds.), Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 20–25) Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Zarefsky, D. (1981). ‘Reasonableness’ in public policy argument: Fields as institutions. In G. Ziegelmueller and J. Rhodes (Eds.), Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 88–100). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Zarefsky, D. (1982). Persistent questions in the theory of argument fields. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 191–203.