References
- Berkson , J. 1978 . “In Dispraise of the Exact Test” . Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference , 2 : 27 – 42 .
- Conover , W. J. 1974 . “Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuing Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables” . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 69 : 374 – 376 .
- D'Agostino , R. B. 1972 . “Relation Between the Chi-Squared and ANOVA Tests for Testing the Equality of k Independent Dichotomous Populations” . The American Statistician , 26 : 30 – 32 .
- Fisher , R. A. 1956 . Statistical Methods and Scientific Inferences , Edinburg : Oliver & Boyd .
- Grizzle , J. E. 1967 . “Continuity Correction in the X2 Test for 2 × 2 Tables” . The American Statistician , 21 : 28 – 32 .
- Heeren , T. and D'Agostino , B. 1987 . “Robustness of the Two Independent Samples t-Test When Applied to Ordinal Scaled Data” . Statistics in Medicine , 6 : 79 – 90 .
- Kempthorne , O. 1979 . “In Dispraise of the Exact Test: Reactions” . Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference , 3 : 199 – 213 .
- Mantel , N. 1974 . “Comment and a Suggestion” on “Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables” . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 69 : 378 – 380 . by W. J. Conover
- Upton , G. J. G. 1982 . “A Comparison of Alternative Tests for the 2 × 2 Comparative Trial” . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 145 : 86 – 105 . Ser. A