Experience Simpson's Paradox in the Classroom

References

• Bea, W., and Scholz, R. W. (1994), “The Success of Graphic Models to Visualize Conditional Probabilities,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (vol. 1), eds. Y. Escoufier, and A. El-Ghazali, Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute, p. 83.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, P. J., Hammel, E. A., and O’Connell, J. W. (1975), “Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data From Berkeley,” American Association for the Advancement of Science, 187, 398–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, C. R. (1972), “On Simpson's Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 364–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, D. E., Velleman, P. F., and De Veaux, R. D. (2010), Stats: Modeling the World (3rd ed.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Buffie, E. G., Welch, R. C., and Paige, D. (1968), Mathematics: Strategies of Teaching, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R., and Bar-Hillel, M. (1980), “Magic Possibilities of the Weighted Average,” Mathematics Magazine, 53, 106–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (1979), “Psychiatric Examples of Simpson's Paradox,” The British Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kievit, R. A., Frankenhuis, W. E., Waldorp, L. J., and Denny, B. (2013), “Simpson's Paradox in Psychological Science: A Practical Guide,” Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracht, D. L. (2002), “Simpson's Paradox in Basketball Statistics,” available at: http://www.math.kent.edu/ darci/simpson/column.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, L. M. (2001), “Representations of Reversal: An Exploration of Simpson's Paradox,” in The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics, eds. Cuoco, A. A. and Curcio, F. R., Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 129–145.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, N. (1990), “From Vectors to Reversal Paradoxes,” Mathematical Gazette, 74, 55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. (2010), The Basic Practice of Statistics (5th ed.), New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. L. (2006), “Paradoxes in Film Ratings,” Journal of Statistics Education, 14. Available at http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n1/datasets.moore.html
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, C. H. (1999), “Simpson's Paradox: An Example From a Longitudinal Study in South Africa,” Journal of Statistics Education, 7. Available at http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/secure/v7n3/datasets.morrell.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Paik, M. (1985), “A Graphic Representation of a Three-Way Contingency Table: Simpson's Paradox and Correlation,” The American Statistician, 39, 53–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlides, M. G., and Perlman, M. D. (2009), “How Likely Is Simpson's Paradox?” The American Statistician, 63, 226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, K., Lee, A., and Bramley-Moore, L. (1899), “Genetic (Reproductive) Selection: Inheritance of Fertility in Man, and of Fecundity in Thoroughbred Racehorses,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 192, 257–330.
   Google Scholar
• Reintjes, R., de Boer, A., van Pelt, W., and Mintjes-de Groot, J. (2000), “Simpson's Paradox: An Example From Hospital Epidemiology,” Epidemiology, 11, 81–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheaffer, R. L., Watkins, A., Witmer, J., and Gnanadeskan, M. (2004), Activity-Based Statistics: Instructor Resources, Emeryville, CA: Key College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiter, K., and Symanzik, J. (2013), “An Applet for the Investigation of Simpson's Paradox,” Journal of Statistics Education, 21. Available at http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v21n1/schneiter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simonoff, J. S. (2003), Analyzing Categorical Data, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E. H. (1951), “The Interpretation of Interaction in Continency Tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 238–241.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A. (1986), “A Geometric Interpretation of Simpson's Paradox,” College Mathematics Journal, 17, 340–341.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R. J., and Innes, J. T. (1985), “On Simpson's Paradox in Economic Statistics,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47, 387–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utts, J. M., and Heckard, R. F. (2004), Mind on Statistics (2nd ed.), Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole, Thomson Learning, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. H. (1982), “Simpson's Paradox in Real Life,” The American Statistician, 36, 46–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardrop, R. L. (1995), “Simpson's Paradox and the Hot Hand in Basketball,” The American Statistician, 49, 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (1967), Mathematics Reform in the Primary School: A Report of a Meeting of Experts Held in Hamburg During January 1966, Hamburg, Germany: Unesco Institute for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Yule, G. U. (1903), “Notes on the Theory of Association of Attributes in Statistics,” Biometrika, 2, 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar