New Approaches for Field Analyses of Cotton Quality by Means of Near-IR Spectroscopy Supported by Chemometrics

REFERENCES

• Bro , R. 2003 . Multivariate calibration – What is in chemometrics for the analytical chemist? Anal. Chim. Acta. 500 : 185 – 194 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert , M. , R. Luttrell , D. Stout , and F. Vogt . 2008 . Introducing chemometrics to the analytical curriculum – Combine theory and lab experience . J. Chem. Ed. 85 : 135 – 137 .
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe , I. 2002 . Principal Component Analysis, , 2nd ed . New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski , E. 2002 . Factor Analysis in Chemistry, , 3rd ed . New York : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski , E. 2005 . Adaptation of the Vogt-Mizaikoff F-test to determine the number of principal factors responsible for a data matrix and comparison with other popular methods . J. Chemom. 18 : 387 – 392 .
   Google Scholar
• Mandel , J. 1982 . Use of singular value decomposition in regression analysis . Am. Stat. 36 : 15 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens , H. , and T. Næs . 1991 . Multivariate Calibration, , 2nd ed . New York : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo , Jr. , J. , S. Buco , and H. Ramey , Jr. 1994 . Studies to measure cotton fibre length, strength, micronaire and colour by vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy. Part II: Principal Component Regression . J. NIR Spectrosc. 2 : 185 – 198 .
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo , Jr. , J. , S. Faught , H. Ramey , Jr. , and S. Buco . 1993 . Studies to measure cotton fiber length, strength, micronaire and color by vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy. Part I: Descriptive statistics of fibre properties and reflectance spectra . J. NIR Spectrosc. 1 : 153 – 173 .
   Google Scholar
• Press , W. , S. Teukolsky , W. Vetterling , and B. Flannery . 2002 . Numerical Recipes in C++, , 2nd ed . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers , J. , J. Montalvo , G. Davidonis , and T. VonHoven . 2010 . Near Infrared measurement of cotton fiber micronaire, maturity and fineness – A comparative investigation . Text Res. J. 80 ( 9 ): 780 – 793 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitzky , A. , and M. Golay . 1964 . Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures . Anal. Chem. 36 : 1627 – 1639 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner , J. , Y. Termonia , and J. Deltour . 1972 . Comments on smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures . Anal Chem. 44 : 1906 – 1909 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson , J. , S. Manickavasagam , and M. Mengüc . 2009 . Cotton fiber quality characterization with light scattering and fourier transform infrared techniques . Appl. Spec. 63 : 321 – 330 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran , C. 2003 . Infrared multispectral imaging: Principles and instrumentation . Appl. Spec. Rev. 38 : 133 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. AMS Cotton Program Brochure . April 2005 . Cotton Classification, Understanding the Data , prepared by Cotton Program, Agricultural Marketing Service . Washington , DC : USDA .
   Google Scholar
• Vogt , F. , and K. Booksh . 2004 . Chemometric methods for data analysis . In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, , 4th online edition , ed. A. Seidel . New York : John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Vogt , F. , and B. Mizaikoff . 2003 . Dynamic determination of the dimension of PCA calibration models using F-statistics . J. Chemom. 17 : 346 – 357 .
   Google Scholar
• Vogt , F. , H. Steiner , K. Booksh , and B. Mizaikoff . 2004b . Chemometric correction of drift effects in optical spectra . Appl. Spec. 58 : 683 – 692 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakelyn , P. , N. Bertoniere , A. French , D. Thibodeaux , B. Triplett , M Rousselle , et al. . 2007 . Physical properties of cotton . In Cotton Fiber Chemistry and Technology , Chapter 7 , ed. M. Lewin , 107 – 109 . Boca Raton , FL : CRC Press .
   Google Scholar
• The use of a company or product name is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply approval or recommendation by the United States Department of Agriculture to the exclusion of others.
   Google Scholar