References
- Ellison, S. L. R., and A. Williams, eds. 2012. Eurachem/CITAC guide: Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 3rd ed. Eurachem. Accessed January 2022. https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam.
- Eurolab. 2007. Measurement uncertainty revisited: Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation – Technical Report No. 1/2007. Brussels: Eurolab. Accessed January 2022. https://eurolab-d.de/files/measurement_uncertainty_revisited_-_alternative_approaches_to_uncertainty_evaluation.pdf.
- European Commission. 1998. Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed January 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31998L0083.
- European Commission. 2015. Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed January 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2015.260.01.0006.01.ENG.
- European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines. 2017. European pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.). 9th ed. Strasbourg: EDQM.
- International Electrotechnical Commission, International Organization for Standardization. 2009. Risk management – Risk assessment techniques – IEC/ISO 31010. Geneva: ISO.
- International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation. 2019. Guidelines on decision rules and statements of conformity – ILAC G8-09. Silverwater: ILAC.
- International Organization for Standardization, and International Electrotechnical Commission. 2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories – ISO/IEC 1725. Geneva: ISO.
- International Organization for Standardization. 2009a. Risk management – Vocabulary – ISO Guide 73. Geneva: ISO.
- International Organization for Standardization. 2009b. Risk management – Principles and guidelines – ISO 31000. Geneva: ISO.
- Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2012a. Evaluation of measurement data – the role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment – JCGM 106. Paris: BIPM. Accessed January 2022. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_106_2012_E.pdf/fe9537d2-e7d7-e146-5abb-2649c3450b25
- Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2012b. International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM) – JCGM 200. Paris: BIPM. Accessed January 2022. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_200_2012.pdf
- Kuselman, I., F. Pennecchi, R. J. N. B. Silva, and D. B. Hibbert. 2017a. Conformity assessment of multicomponent materials or objects: Risk of false decisions due to measurement uncertainty - A case study of denatured alcohols. Talanta 164:189–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.11.035.
- Kuselman, I., F. Pennecchi, R. J. N. B. Silva, and D. B. Hibbert. 2017b. Risk of false decision on conformity of a multicomponent material when test results of the components' content are correlated. Talanta 174:789–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.073.
- Kuselman, I., F. Pennecchi, R. J. N. B. Silva, D. B. Hibbert, and E. Anchutina. 2018. Total risk of a false decision on conformity of an alloy due to measurement uncertainty and correlation of test results. Talanta 189:666–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.07.049.
- Lourenço, F. R., and R. J. N. B. Silva. 2019. Risk of false conformity decisions of multicomponent items controlled by correlated measurement results due to the sharing of analytical steps. Talanta 196:174–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.021.
- Oliveira, E. C., and F. R. Lourenço. 2021. Risk of false conformity assessment applied to automotive fuel analysis: A multiparameter approach. Chemosphere 263:128265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128265.
- Pennecchi, F., I. Kuselman, R. J. N. B. Silva, and D. B. Hibbert. 2018. Risk of a false decision on conformity of an environmental compartment due to measurement uncertainty of concentrations of two or more pollutants. Chemosphere 202:165–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.054.
- Separovic, L., R. J. N. B. Silva, and F. R. Lourenço. 2019. Improved spreadsheet method for determination of between components metrological correlation due to the sharing of analytical steps. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laborary Systems 189:161–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.05.002.
- Silva, R. J. N. B., F. R. Lourenço, F. R. Pennecchi, D. B. Hibbert, and I. Kuselman. 2019. Spreadsheet for evaluation of global risks in conformity assessment of a multicomponent material or object. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laborary Systems 188:1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.02.010.
- Silva, R. J. N. B., F. Pennecchi, D. B. Hibbert, and I. Kuselman. 2018. Tutorial and spreadsheets for Bayesian evaluation of risks of false decisions on conformity of a multicomponent material or object due to measurement uncertainty. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laborary Systems 182:109–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.09.004.
- Silva, R. J. N. B., J. Santos, and M. F. Camões. 2002. Worst case uncertainty estimates for routine instrumental analysis. The Analyst 127 (7):957–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/B201362M.
- Silva, R. J. N. B., J. Santos, and M. F. Camões. 2006. A new terminology for the approaches to the quantification of the measurement uncertainty. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 10 (12):664–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0071-y.